HC pulls up health dept over ‘favouritism’ in tribal postings of docs

HC pulls up health dept over ‘favouritism’ in tribal postings of docs
Shimla: Expressing concern over the discriminatory posting policy of medics, the Himachal Pradesh high court has questioned the state health department for repeatedly sending certain doctors to difficult tribal areas while shielding others from such postings throughout their careers."This court observes that the profession of doctor is one of the most pious professions in the world. However, if a doctor himself or herself feels aggrieved by the discriminatory attitude being adopted against him or her by the employer qua his or her posting, then obviously, such a doctor would not be in a good mental state to render services to the patients with 100% devotion," remarked the high court bench headed by Justice Ajay Mohan Goel.The court was hearing a petition moved by Dr Baseem Akram challenging his transfer to the tribal area of Bharmour in Chamba district.The petitioner informed the court that he had already served in a tribal area from January 2020 to November 2022 before leaving for his postgraduate course. After completing his studies, he was once again posted in a tribal region, prompting him to approach the court alleging unfair treatment.
Justice Goel observed that the grievance raised by the petitioner appeared justified, especially when several doctors were never posted in tribal regions despite serving for years in comparatively comfortable stations.The court referred to records submitted by the health department showing that Dr Chakarborthy, posted at Civil Hospital, Dalhousie, never served in a tribal area. Similarly, doctors posted in Kangra district, including Dr Swati Saha, serving at Zonal Hospital, Dharamshala, since 2017, who is to superannuate on December 31 this year, and Dr Sheily Sharma at Civil Hospital, Fatehpur, since 2011, were also never assigned tribal postings. "It is evident that some doctors are being favoured by the department," emphasised the court.The bench questioned the rationale behind repeatedly deputing the same doctors to remote regions while exempting others altogether. It was observed that such discrimination created "discord" among medical professionals and could be avoided through a fair and rational transfer policy.The court emphasised that all doctors must share the responsibility of serving in tribal and hard areas, rather than repeatedly burdening a select few.The court also directed the state govt to consider posting the petitioner doctor to a non-tribal station and replace him with a doctor who had not yet served in a tribal area.MSID:: 131115143 413 |

author
About the AuthorSanjeev Verma

Sanjeev Verma is a Senior Assistant Editor covering Himachal Pradesh for The Times of India. His journalism experience spans across multiple states, including Punjab and Haryana, in addition to covering the Punjab and Haryana High Court, after an initial stint in Delhi. He navigates the realms of politics, security, public policy, finance, industries and commerce, rural development, legal affairs, environment, defence services welfare, and NRI affairs, with a focus on investigative journalism.

End of Article
Follow Us On Social Media