passive euthanasia

India's first passive euthanasia recipient, Harish Rana, passed away at AIIMS-Delhi after 13 years in a vegetative state. The Supreme Court had permitted the withdrawal of life support, allowing a dignified end. This case reignited the debate on 'letting a patient die' versus actively ending life, highlighting the legal and ethical complexities surrounding end-of-life decisions.

What does the right to die with dignity mean in practice? Harish Rana’s lawyer breaks down the Supreme Court’s ruling, the expanded definition of life support, and what it means for families.

‘Jurisprudence normally talks about ‘right to life’...The same jurisprudence talks about a life of dignity and when that life itself is one that of suffering and there is no support system, it finds a way to address the issue – end of life’

Harish Rana, India's first individual legally granted passive euthanasia, passed away at AIIMS New Delhi. The Supreme Court had permitted the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for Rana, who had been in a persistent vegetative state since 2013. His family donated his corneas and heart valves.

Harish Rana, India's first passive euthanasia recipient, has passed away at 31 after a 13-year coma. His cremation in Delhi marked a quiet end to a case that ignited national debate on life, dignity, and medical care. The Supreme Court had permitted the withdrawal of life support, allowing for a natural death with palliative care, concluding his family's decade-long struggle.

The poignant drama 'Mercy,' tackling passive euthanasia, is set for an April 24 release, with its first glimpse arriving March 27, attached to 'Dhurandhar: The Revenge.' Actor Raj Vasudeva calls it a deeply personal project, while Adil Hussain reflects on exploring love, grief, and acceptance. The film, directed by Mitul Patel, has already garnered global acclaim at international festivals.

Harish Rana, India's first patient granted passive euthanasia by the Supreme Court, has passed away at AIIMS after 13 years in a vegetative state. His death followed the withdrawal of life support, a decision made to uphold his right to die with dignity. Rana's family, who donated his corneas and heart valves, found comfort in his peaceful end.

A 32-year-old man, Harish Rana, has been moved to AIIMS for passive euthanasia after the Supreme Court upheld his right to die with dignity. Rana has been in a vegetative state since 2013 due to severe head injuries. The process involves withdrawing life-sustaining treatment while ensuring comfort and pain relief.

In a poignant farewell that ended a 12-year vigil, 31-year-old Harish Rana was cremated at the Green Park crematorium in Delhi. With tears held back, his younger brother Ashish ignited the pyre, supported by their sister, who embodied strength.

In Himachal Pradesh, a village mourns as Harish Rana, 32, is taken off life support following a Supreme Court 'right to die' ruling. After 13 years in a vegetative state due to a 2013 fall, his family's long vigil ends.

India's Supreme Court has permitted passive euthanasia, reigniting the debate on 'letting die' versus 'active killing'. While passive euthanasia involves withdrawing life support, active euthanasia means deliberately ending life. The court's ruling in the Harish Rana case underscores the complex ethical and legal considerations in end-of-life care, balancing life preservation with patient autonomy and suffering.

The Supreme Court has granted approval for passive euthanasia for Harish Rana, a 32-year-old man in a vegetative state for over 13 years. This historic verdict allows the withdrawal of life support, offering a dignified death and ending his family's prolonged agony. The decision follows recommendations from medical boards and personal interaction with Rana's parents.

Harish Rana, in a vegetative state since 2013, has been moved to AIIMS for passive euthanasia following a Supreme Court ruling. A specialized medical team will oversee the process, focusing on comfort and dignity by withdrawing life support. This marks a significant step in allowing individuals with irreversible conditions to die with peace.

The Supreme Court has permitted passive euthanasia for Harish Rana, a 31-year-old man in a permanent vegetative state since 2013. His family's plea to withdraw life-sustaining treatment was granted after medical experts confirmed no signs of recovery. This decision aligns with the court's 2018 ruling on living wills and the right to die with dignity.

After 13 years in a vegetative state, Harish Rana’s parents asked the courts for the unthinkable — permission to let him die. The Supreme Court’s passive euthanasia ruling marks a key moment for India’s right to die with dignity

The Supreme Court acknowledged the profound love of parents allowing passive euthanasia for their 32-year-old son, ending his 13-year vegetative state. Justices praised their devotion, stating the decision relieves suffering and allows nature to take its course when medicine can only delay the inevitable. This act of compassion and courage prioritizes mercy over artificially prolonging life.

The landmark judgment allowing passive euthanasia operates at what the two-judge bench described as the delicate intersection of ‘love, loss, medicine, and mercy’. Here’s how the Supreme Court arrived at the verdict

After a 13-year struggle, the Supreme Court granted permission for the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana, who has been in a vegetative state since a 2013 accident. His parents, facing immense emotional and financial strain, expressed gratitude for the humane judgment, viewing it as a release for their son from prolonged suffering.

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has permitted the withdrawal of medical treatment for Harish Rana, a 31-year-old man in a vegetative state. The apex court has instructed Delhi's AIIMS to facilitate the discontinuation of life support for Rana, who has been in this condition for a considerable period.

Even as SC has revived the debate on legalizing passive euthanasia, several petitioners who had earlier petitioned courts to be granted the right to die have pointed out that Indian laws are based on the Anglo-Saxon judicial system and Western jurisprudence.

Hospitals will have to set up approval committees to vet cases of passive euthanasia and any distortion of facts before such panels may lead to a maximum of 10 years in jail and up to Rs 1 crore as fine, the Union health ministry has proposed in its re-drafted bill on the withdrawal of medical life support.

SC nod for withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in special cases, addresses some apprehensions doctors have in taking such calls. Rest of the reassurance needs to come from govts & hospitals

In 2014, an SC bench had decided to adjudicate the legality of active and passive euthanasia and the concept of "living will".

passive euthanasia: Human rights activist and author Pinki Virani, who had sought mercy killing for Aruna Shanbaug, a nurse who was in a vegetative state for 42 years before dying in 2015, today hailed the Supreme Court judgment in favour of passive euthanasia.

The subject of Euthanasia was also covered in the movie Guzaarish.