UP to NGT: Applicants seeking Yamuna flood aid are encroachers
Noida: UP govt has told the National Green Tribunal (NGT) that farmhouse owners seeking compensation for damage caused during the July 2023 Yamuna floods had encroached upon the floodplain and had been served eviction notices more than a year before the deluge.Submitting details of the river's floodplain demarcation, the state said the applicants, who own farmhouses and fields along the Yamuna in Gautam Budh Nagar, had raised unauthorised constructions on the river's floodplain despite a clear prohibition by the Noida Authority.
Notices warning against construction in the notified area were issued on June 8, 2022, the state govt counsel told the principal bench of the tribunal, which was examining a compensation claim submitted by Suman Chauhan, Manoj Singh and Dinesh Kumar Tyagi claiming that over 50 land owners were affected by the flood. The three had moved the tribunal in 2023, seeking compensation for damage to their houses and agricultural land.The applicants argued that the flooding was not a natural disaster but the result of human actions, including silt accumulation that narrowed the river channel, faulty flood regulation and the failure to strengthen embankments between the river and nearby villages. They sought compensation under the principle of "no-fault liability", citing earlier tribunal orders in similar cases.The state govt, UP irrigation department, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, Noida district magistrate and Noida Authority, all respondents in the case, had contested the claim, maintaining that the floods were a natural event that was worsened by widespread encroachment on the floodplain. Officials told the tribunal that those seeking compensation were themselves in violation of environmental and land-use norms.In an affidavit, the executive engineer of the irrigation and water resources department informed the tribunal that the Yamuna's floodplain had been formally demarcated and notified on Dec 21, 2024. The demarcation covered critical stretches of the river, including areas from Asgarpur to Etawah and from Shahpur to Prayagraj, based on a 100-year flood return period and one-metre contour data.According to the affidavit, the Central Water Commission provided geographical coordinates for the floodplain passing through Noida. These coordinates were verified on the ground, after which demarcation pillars were installed to physically mark the floodplain limits. Photographs of the pillars were also placed on record before the tribunal.Counsel representing the authorities said action had been initiated against the applicants for raising unauthorised farmhouses, prompting them to approach the high court. While the applicants claimed they were only cultivating farmland with temporary structures, the authorities disputed this, describing the constructions as illegal and permanent.An affidavit filed by Noida district magistrate on Sept 2 last year said the applicants had challenged a public notice issued on June 8, 2022, by the Noida Authority. The notice made it clear that, under the UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1975, no construction is permitted in Noida's notified area without prior approval of the Authority.The notice also stated that no other department had the power to grant construction permissions in the notified area. "Despite repeated notices, warning boards, demolition drives and information circulated through its official website, instances of illegal construction continue to rise. Accordingly, the notice strictly prohibits any construction in the notified submerged area, warns that unauthorised structures will be demolished at the cost of the violator (recoverable as land revenue), and states that legal action will also be initiated against encroachers," the counsel said, adding that it is against this notice that the applicants moved the high court.
Notices warning against construction in the notified area were issued on June 8, 2022, the state govt counsel told the principal bench of the tribunal, which was examining a compensation claim submitted by Suman Chauhan, Manoj Singh and Dinesh Kumar Tyagi claiming that over 50 land owners were affected by the flood. The three had moved the tribunal in 2023, seeking compensation for damage to their houses and agricultural land.The applicants argued that the flooding was not a natural disaster but the result of human actions, including silt accumulation that narrowed the river channel, faulty flood regulation and the failure to strengthen embankments between the river and nearby villages. They sought compensation under the principle of "no-fault liability", citing earlier tribunal orders in similar cases.The state govt, UP irrigation department, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, Noida district magistrate and Noida Authority, all respondents in the case, had contested the claim, maintaining that the floods were a natural event that was worsened by widespread encroachment on the floodplain. Officials told the tribunal that those seeking compensation were themselves in violation of environmental and land-use norms.In an affidavit, the executive engineer of the irrigation and water resources department informed the tribunal that the Yamuna's floodplain had been formally demarcated and notified on Dec 21, 2024. The demarcation covered critical stretches of the river, including areas from Asgarpur to Etawah and from Shahpur to Prayagraj, based on a 100-year flood return period and one-metre contour data.According to the affidavit, the Central Water Commission provided geographical coordinates for the floodplain passing through Noida. These coordinates were verified on the ground, after which demarcation pillars were installed to physically mark the floodplain limits. Photographs of the pillars were also placed on record before the tribunal.Counsel representing the authorities said action had been initiated against the applicants for raising unauthorised farmhouses, prompting them to approach the high court. While the applicants claimed they were only cultivating farmland with temporary structures, the authorities disputed this, describing the constructions as illegal and permanent.An affidavit filed by Noida district magistrate on Sept 2 last year said the applicants had challenged a public notice issued on June 8, 2022, by the Noida Authority. The notice made it clear that, under the UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1975, no construction is permitted in Noida's notified area without prior approval of the Authority.The notice also stated that no other department had the power to grant construction permissions in the notified area. "Despite repeated notices, warning boards, demolition drives and information circulated through its official website, instances of illegal construction continue to rise. Accordingly, the notice strictly prohibits any construction in the notified submerged area, warns that unauthorised structures will be demolished at the cost of the violator (recoverable as land revenue), and states that legal action will also be initiated against encroachers," the counsel said, adding that it is against this notice that the applicants moved the high court.
You Can Also Check: Noida AQI
|
Bank Holidays in Noida |
Gold Rate Today in Noida |
Silver Rate Today in Noida
Top Comment
P
Partho Chakrabarti
7 hours ago
NOTHING WILL HAPPEN ONLY "TARIQUE PEH TARIQUE",& FINALLY THEY WILL BE FREE PLUS SOME COMPENSATION EILL BE PAID,AS THEY WILL MAKE A CONTRIBUTIONS,😏😏😏Read allPost comment
Popular from City
- Missing teen's head found hanging from tree in Varanasi forest
- 'My girl lay soaked in blood. No one helped: 6-year-old dies in hit-and-run in Delhi; grandmother recounts horror
- Schoolgirl forced to consume liquor, raped by 3 at knife point; rescued after 36 hours from Hyderabad flat
- CCTV shocker: Told not to smoke while refuelling, man sparks inferno at petrol pump
- Jabalpur stone-pelting: Youth 'vandalises' temple grill during Aarti, clashes break out between groups; police deployed
end of article
Trending Stories
- 'Mobile phone shows time': UP govt cites SC ruling on loudspeakers for Ramzan announcements during night hours
- CBSE Class 12 Physics exam 2026 analysis: Students and experts call paper 'easy to moderate'
- TGBIE Telangana Inter hall ticket 2026 released at tgbie.cgg.gov.in: Direct link to download admit card here
- UK PM Keir Starmer blocks Donald Trump from using RAF bases for potential Iran strike
- 'Out of his limits': Shadab Khan reprimanded by PCB over swipe at Ex-Pakistan legends
- Middle East on boil: 5 reasons why Trump may attack Iran anytime now
- 'Play like Vaibhav Sooryavanshi': R Ashwin's bold take as India march into Super 8
Featured in city
- Indian teacher Rouble Nagi, who painted educational murals across slums, wins Global Teacher Prize
- 57-year-old Sikh man kidnapped from California gurdwara; CCTV captures 3 unidentified people 'forcing' him into white SUV
- 10 minutes of chaos: 65-year-old umpire dies in bee attack during cricket match in Uttar Pradesh
- CCTV shocker: Told not to smoke while refuelling, man sparks inferno at petrol pump
- Missing teen's head found hanging from tree in Varanasi forest
- 'My girl lay soaked in blood. No one helped: 6-year-old dies in hit-and-run in Delhi; grandmother recounts horror
Photostories
- 5 luxury cars engineered to feel effortless at high speed
- Angelina Jolie's most underrated movies: ‘Hackers,’ ‘Life or Something Like It,' and more to watch on OTT
- New OTT releases this weekend: 'Raakshasa', 'Pavane,' 'Kennedy,' 'Heated Rivalry'and more to stream
- 9 national parks around the world that aren’t about wildlife
- From Hyderabad biryani to Bengaluru idli: 'Ghost' feature in billing system that hid Rs 70,000 crore from tax net
- Ramadan 2026: Today's Iftar timing and 8 must-try dishes
- From Sachin Tendulkar to Virat Kohli: 5 Indian cricketers who credit their wives or girlfriends for success
- Top 10 beaches in the world for 2026 – the list is out!
- 'Normal People', 'In The Absence'; ‘Peaky Blinders’ fame Cillian Murphy’s best- OTT dramas to watch
- What are the risks in Real Estate investment?
Videos
03:45 PM Modi-Trump Meeting Speculation Grows As US Envoy Sergio Gor Drops Massive Hint, Says 'Stay Tuned'05:03 'With Pax Silica, We Say No To Economic Blackmail', Says US As India Signs Strategic Tech Pact10:22 US Calls India’s Role Strategic, Essential As Pax Silica Entry Marks Strategic Shift In AI, Semicon03:27 'AI For Cows?': Nandan Nilekani Reveals How PM Modi’s AI Vision For Cows Became Amul’s Sarlaben App05:09 Pak PM Sharif Hails Trump As 'Saviour Of South Asia' Even As 'Upset' US President Flags Trade Rift04:07 From Invite To Isolation: Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif 'Sidelined' At Donald Trump's Gaza Peace Summit29:22 Epstein Files: King Charles' Brother & UK’s Former Prince Andrew Arrested For 'Misconduct In Office'03:08 "We Can’t Be Seen As Weak": Tharoor’s Bold Claim On Rafale Deal04:28 “Nothing Like Money”: Donald Trump Says 200% Tariff Warning Stopped India-Pak Fight
Up Next