Muslim groups, Left, TMC oppose govt’s move to mandate recitation of all 6 verses of Vande Mataram
NEW DELHI: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board on Thursday strongly objected to the central govt’s recent notification mandating the recitation of all six verses of ‘Vande Mataram’ at official functions and in schools before the National Anthem, Jana Gana Mana.
The AIMPLB has termed the decision “unconstitutional and contrary to religious freedom” and demanded that the govt immediately withdraw the notification or else it will challenge it in the court. Both factions of prominent Muslim body Jamiat Ulama -i- Hind have also raised objections to the govt’s order.
Meanwhile, Left parties like CPI(M) and CPI also came forward to oppose the MHA order. CPI(M) demanded that the govt “uphold the spirit of the Constitution and immediately withdraw this order”.
The CPI(M) accused the BJP-led union govt of attempting to create an “unnecessary controversy concerning the national song and the national anthem with ulterior motives” and that the “BJP govt should not be allowed to play with such historic cultural symbols.”
The Left party highlighted that “the Constitution of India clearly states in Article 51A(a) that it is the duty of every citizen to respect the national flag and the national anthem. After thorough deliberation, the constituent assembly adopted the statement made by President Rajendra Prasad concerning the national song, whose two stanzas only would be sung.”
“Through its recent order, the govt seeks to include the remaining four stanzas, which the constituent assembly felt did not resonate the secular character of the Indian Republic,” the party added.
CPI’s Rajya Sabha MP Sandosh Kumar P accused the govt of “cynically weaponising culture to polarise the people.” “Our position is clear: for us, the country comes first; for the BJP, elections come first,” he added.
Referring to the ruling party at the Centre, he alleged that “it is deeply ironic that those who had no role in the freedom struggle and remained subservient to British colonialism now claim the authority to issue certificates of nationalism.”
Trinamool Congress lashed out at the govt alleging that the BJP was “Bangla-Birodhi”. “And now, in an official notification, @HMOIndia has distorted the original lyrics of Vande Mataram penned by Rishi Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay in Anandamath,” the party alleged in a post on X.
Elaborating on the reasons for opposition, AIMPLB general secretary, Maulana Mohammed Fazlur Rahim Mujaddidi, alleged that the MHA order was “unconstitutional, against religious freedom and secular values, contrary to Supreme Court judgment, and directly conflicting with the religious beliefs of Muslims.”
“Whatever the political considerations behind implementing this decision ahead of the West Bengal elections, Muslims cannot accept it, as it directly conflicts with their faith,” he added.
Maulana Mujaddidi said that, following Rabindranath Tagore’s advice and deliberations in the Constituent Assembly, it had been agreed that only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram would be used. He said that “a secular government cannot forcibly impose the beliefs or teachings of one religion upon followers of other religions”.
He added that the song was written in the context of Bengal and contains references to the worship and veneration of Durga and other deities.
“A Muslim worships only one God, Allah, without partners, and Islam does not permit any form of associating partners with God,” the AIMPLB general secretary emphasised.
“Therefore, the Board demands that the Central Government immediately withdraw the notification; otherwise, the Board will challenge it in the court,” he asserted.
Jamiat Ulama - i - Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani described the govt order as “biased” that he alleged was “a conspiracy to snatch the religious freedom” granted to all citizens by the Constitution of India.
He further alleged that the Central govt’s order on Vande Mataram was a “unilateral and coercive decision” and that it reflects “a systematic attempt to curtail the constitutional rights of minorities”.
“Muslims do not prevent anyone from singing or playing “Vande Mataram”; however, some verses of the song are based on beliefs that portray the homeland as a deity, which contradict the fundamental belief of monotheistic religions. Since a Muslim worships only one Allah, forcing him to sing this song is a clear violation of Article 25 of the Constitution and several judgments of the Supreme Court,” he added.
In a statement from the Maulana Mahmood Madani-led faction of Jamiat Ulama -i- Hind faction, its general secretary Maulana Hakimuddin Qasmi said, “If the majority community wishes to recite it, they are fully entitled to do so. However, making it mandatory for all citizens would amount to imposing restrictions on religious freedom,” he added.
He stated that the Constitution of India guarantees every citizen the inalienable right to profess, practice, and propagate his or her religion, and to live in accordance with one’s faith and conscience. “Therefore, compelling any individual to recite a specific poem or composition that conflicts with his or her religious beliefs is contrary to the spirit and provisions of the Constitution,” he said.
He further stated that “India is a pluralistic and multi-religious nation where constitutional supremacy and the principle of “unity in diversity” form the foundation of national integration. Any step that weakens this foundation cannot be in the interest of the country.”
“The Muslims of India hold a unanimous and unequivocal position that any decision undermining religious freedom will not be accepted. We strongly urge the Government of India to review the said circular in light of constitutional provisions, judicial precedents, and the diverse social fabric of the nation, so that religious liberty, constitutional dignity, and social harmony may be preserved,” he added.
Get the latest updates on Election 2026 exit poll results across Assam, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, and Puducherry.
Meanwhile, Left parties like CPI(M) and CPI also came forward to oppose the MHA order. CPI(M) demanded that the govt “uphold the spirit of the Constitution and immediately withdraw this order”.
The CPI(M) accused the BJP-led union govt of attempting to create an “unnecessary controversy concerning the national song and the national anthem with ulterior motives” and that the “BJP govt should not be allowed to play with such historic cultural symbols.”
The Left party highlighted that “the Constitution of India clearly states in Article 51A(a) that it is the duty of every citizen to respect the national flag and the national anthem. After thorough deliberation, the constituent assembly adopted the statement made by President Rajendra Prasad concerning the national song, whose two stanzas only would be sung.”
“Through its recent order, the govt seeks to include the remaining four stanzas, which the constituent assembly felt did not resonate the secular character of the Indian Republic,” the party added.
CPI’s Rajya Sabha MP Sandosh Kumar P accused the govt of “cynically weaponising culture to polarise the people.” “Our position is clear: for us, the country comes first; for the BJP, elections come first,” he added.
Trinamool Congress lashed out at the govt alleging that the BJP was “Bangla-Birodhi”. “And now, in an official notification, @HMOIndia has distorted the original lyrics of Vande Mataram penned by Rishi Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay in Anandamath,” the party alleged in a post on X.
Elaborating on the reasons for opposition, AIMPLB general secretary, Maulana Mohammed Fazlur Rahim Mujaddidi, alleged that the MHA order was “unconstitutional, against religious freedom and secular values, contrary to Supreme Court judgment, and directly conflicting with the religious beliefs of Muslims.”
“Whatever the political considerations behind implementing this decision ahead of the West Bengal elections, Muslims cannot accept it, as it directly conflicts with their faith,” he added.
Maulana Mujaddidi said that, following Rabindranath Tagore’s advice and deliberations in the Constituent Assembly, it had been agreed that only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram would be used. He said that “a secular government cannot forcibly impose the beliefs or teachings of one religion upon followers of other religions”.
He added that the song was written in the context of Bengal and contains references to the worship and veneration of Durga and other deities.
“A Muslim worships only one God, Allah, without partners, and Islam does not permit any form of associating partners with God,” the AIMPLB general secretary emphasised.
“Therefore, the Board demands that the Central Government immediately withdraw the notification; otherwise, the Board will challenge it in the court,” he asserted.
Jamiat Ulama - i - Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani described the govt order as “biased” that he alleged was “a conspiracy to snatch the religious freedom” granted to all citizens by the Constitution of India.
He further alleged that the Central govt’s order on Vande Mataram was a “unilateral and coercive decision” and that it reflects “a systematic attempt to curtail the constitutional rights of minorities”.
“Muslims do not prevent anyone from singing or playing “Vande Mataram”; however, some verses of the song are based on beliefs that portray the homeland as a deity, which contradict the fundamental belief of monotheistic religions. Since a Muslim worships only one Allah, forcing him to sing this song is a clear violation of Article 25 of the Constitution and several judgments of the Supreme Court,” he added.
In a statement from the Maulana Mahmood Madani-led faction of Jamiat Ulama -i- Hind faction, its general secretary Maulana Hakimuddin Qasmi said, “If the majority community wishes to recite it, they are fully entitled to do so. However, making it mandatory for all citizens would amount to imposing restrictions on religious freedom,” he added.
He stated that the Constitution of India guarantees every citizen the inalienable right to profess, practice, and propagate his or her religion, and to live in accordance with one’s faith and conscience. “Therefore, compelling any individual to recite a specific poem or composition that conflicts with his or her religious beliefs is contrary to the spirit and provisions of the Constitution,” he said.
He further stated that “India is a pluralistic and multi-religious nation where constitutional supremacy and the principle of “unity in diversity” form the foundation of national integration. Any step that weakens this foundation cannot be in the interest of the country.”
“The Muslims of India hold a unanimous and unequivocal position that any decision undermining religious freedom will not be accepted. We strongly urge the Government of India to review the said circular in light of constitutional provisions, judicial precedents, and the diverse social fabric of the nation, so that religious liberty, constitutional dignity, and social harmony may be preserved,” he added.
Get the latest updates on Election 2026 exit poll results across Assam, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, and Puducherry.
Top Comment
k
krishnaupadhya
74 days ago
Secular Hindus, atheists, Muslims, Sikhs, Jains all oppose this sectarian agenda. It is divisive, not unifying! If we invoke, Durga, Laxmi, Saraswati and all, how this can be Vande Mataram? So stay with the first two stanzas. Fighting against the bigotry and antisecular values is also patriotism of the highest orderRead allPost comment
Popular from India
- 'This is TMC’s technique': BJP alleges party symbol 'taped' over in Bengal's Falta
- 'Historic hat-trick of victories': PM Modi hails 'fearless voting in Bengal'
- National medical commission removes cap on MBBS seats, eases population norm
- West Bengal election phase 2: Timing, schedule and other details you need to know
- West Bengal polls: Bhowanipore feels the heat as Mamata and Suvendu take on each other
end of article
Trending Stories
- Exit Poll Results 2026 Live Updates: Pollsters predict big BJP win in Bengal & Assam, DMK win in TN, UDF edge in Kerala
- Tamil Nadu Exit Poll 2026 Live Updates: Pollsters back Stalin's return; TVK a key disruptor
- West Bengal Exit Poll 2026 Live Updates: BJP to win 150-175 seats, early predictions say
- Exit poll results 2026 for Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Assam, Kerala, Puducherry: Date, time, where, and how to watch
- Assam Exit Poll 2026 Live Updates: BJP to come back stronger with 80-100 seats in Assam, say pollsters
- Kerala Exit Poll 2026 Live Updates: Pollsters give slight edge to UDF with 70-90 seats
- Puducherry Exit Poll 2026 Live Updates: Record turnout, VVIP battles and multi-cornered contests set stage for key verdict
Featured in India
- Puducherry exit polls 2026: NDA likely to retain power; Congress, TVK lag in fragmented fight
- Bengal exit polls 2026: BJP predicted to unseat Mamata Banerjee; TMC staring at setback
- Kerala exit polls 2026: UDF predicted to win coastal state in neck-and-neck contest with LDF
- Assam exit polls 2026: Himanta Biswa Sarma-led BJP projected to retain govt with strong lead
- Tamil Nadu exit polls 2026: 3 out of 4 pollsters back Stalin return; TVK a key disruptor
- US restitutes 657 stolen antiquities to India
Photostories
- Why does day-old rice get dry in the refrigerator? 4 easy fixes to keep it soft and fluffy
- ‘Ted Lasso’ season 4 release: Here is all you need to know
- She thought it was stress, doctors found a hormone disorder
- Tamannaah Bhatia serves Andy Sachs energy at ‘The Devil Wears Prada’ India screening in a dramatic David Koma ensemble
- Jyotiraditya Scindia carries an onion in his pocket: Why Indians follow this tradition in summer
- Is your child not serious about studies? 5 parental behaviours that could be the reason
- TMC's fort or BJP's breakthrough? The 7 districts that will decide who rules Nabanna
- ‘Baahubali 2’ 9 year anniversary: Top 5 iconic scenes that defined Prabhas’ superstardom
- 5 Pokémon that secretly exist in the real world
- “I’ve been smoking for years and I’m fine”: What doctors say about delayed damage
Videos
08:34 Raghav Chadha Fallout: Who Really Wins and Loses in Punjab?06:07 Mumbai–Pune Expressway’s ‘Missing Link’ Opens May 1: Faster Travel, Better Safety, No Extra Toll03:30 90-Year-Old Rejects Apology, Then Court Pushes ₹20 Crore Case to 204606:06 Ganga Expressway Inaugurated: What ₹1,500 Toll Gets You on UP’s 594-km High-Speed Corridor | PM Modi04:15 UAE Quits OPEC In Big Oil Shake-Up: What It Means For India08:06 ‘Siddaramaiah Ready To Step Down As Karnataka CM If Rahul Gandhi Asks’: Ex-Minister Rajanna09:58 Bengal Phase 2 Polls: 142 Constituencies Vote Today, Over 3.21 Crore Voters to Decide05:04 Chokepoints of Power: how India can 'trump' China on the seas03:10 Swati Maliwal’s Explosive Exit: Assault Allegations, ‘Betrayal’ Charges Rock AAP As She Joins BJP
Up Next