TN’s leave restriction for third pregnancy unlawful: Madras high court
CHENNAI: A govt order (GO) issued by the Tamil Nadu restricting maternity leave for third pregnancy to 12 weeks is unjustifiable and against the law settled by the Supreme Court, ruled Madras high court on Wednesday.
“This kind of restriction made by the govt through the GO is against the dictum of the Supreme Court as well as this court. The same cannot be approved by this court,” a division bench of Justice R Suresh Kumar and Justice N Senthilkumar said.
“For restricting the period to 12 weeks, absolutely, there is no justification on the part of the govt. Pregnancy, may be first, second or third, but the suffering would be the same and the pre-delivery as well as the post-delivery care that a mother needs to take is same in all such pregnancies,” the court added.
“Therefore, no discrimination could be shown by the govt in approving the maternity benefits, especially maternity leave for the third pregnancy to the employees,” the bench said.
The court passed the order on a plea moved by Shayee Nisha, challenging rejection of her application for maternity leave by the principal district judge, Villupuram.
“... several policy decisions are being taken by the Tamil Nadu govt for the welfare of the women folks, and several new and novel schemes are also being introduced for the upliftment of the women, the present deviation made by the govt by restricting the maternity benefits to the pregnant woman only to 12 weeks is not in consonance with the consistent policy taken by the state govt, nor is it in consonance with the law settled in this regard by the Supreme Court,” the court said.
“Resultantly, we have no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, is liable to be set aside and accordingly, it is set aside. As a sequel, there shall be a direction to the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, to consider the application submitted by the petitioner and sanction the maternity leave as equal to that of pregnant women of first and second pregnancy, unmindful of the GO dated March 13,” the court said.
“For restricting the period to 12 weeks, absolutely, there is no justification on the part of the govt. Pregnancy, may be first, second or third, but the suffering would be the same and the pre-delivery as well as the post-delivery care that a mother needs to take is same in all such pregnancies,” the court added.
“Therefore, no discrimination could be shown by the govt in approving the maternity benefits, especially maternity leave for the third pregnancy to the employees,” the bench said.
The court passed the order on a plea moved by Shayee Nisha, challenging rejection of her application for maternity leave by the principal district judge, Villupuram.
“... several policy decisions are being taken by the Tamil Nadu govt for the welfare of the women folks, and several new and novel schemes are also being introduced for the upliftment of the women, the present deviation made by the govt by restricting the maternity benefits to the pregnant woman only to 12 weeks is not in consonance with the consistent policy taken by the state govt, nor is it in consonance with the law settled in this regard by the Supreme Court,” the court said.
“Resultantly, we have no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, is liable to be set aside and accordingly, it is set aside. As a sequel, there shall be a direction to the Principal District Judge, Villupuram, to consider the application submitted by the petitioner and sanction the maternity leave as equal to that of pregnant women of first and second pregnancy, unmindful of the GO dated March 13,” the court said.
Popular from Business
- Ganga Expressway inaugurated by PM Modi: UP's longest expressway between Meerut & Prayagraj; check travel time, route, speed limit - top facts & images
- UAE’s exit from OPEC & OPEC+: Shaking world oil order but benefit for India
- Strait of Hormuz blockade persists, but India’s imports of Russian oil are down from highs seen in March - here’s why
- Amaravati to Hyderabad in 70 mins, Pune to Mumbai in 48 mins: Vaishnaw's new bullet train roadmap for south India
- Why the UAE asked Pakistan for its $3.5bn back
end of article
Trending Stories
06:06 Ganga Expressway inauguration by PM Modi today: UP's longest expressway between Meerut & Prayagraj; check travel time, route, speed limit - top facts & images- Paytm share price today: One 97 Communications plunges 8% after RBI cancels Paytm Payments Bank’s banking licence.; what’s the outlook?
- Stock Market Today Live Updates: GIFT Nifty signals muted started for Sensex, Nifty50 as Hormuz blockade continues amid US-Iran ceasefire
- Billions to be paid! US starts refund process for Trump tariffs: Can Indian exporters claim?
06:01 Explained: On way to 4th largest, how India slipped to 6th rank & what it means for 3rd largest economy dream- Foreign exchange reserves touch $700 billion mark again; kitty rises $3.83 billion
09:42 Crude oil prices plunge over 10% as Iran reopens Strait of Hormuz, stocks rally
Photostories
- Why does day-old rice get dry in the refrigerator? 4 easy fixes to keep it soft and fluffy
- ‘Ted Lasso’ season 4 release: Here is all you need to know
- She thought it was stress, doctors found a hormone disorder
- Tamannaah Bhatia serves Andy Sachs energy at ‘The Devil Wears Prada’ India screening in a dramatic David Koma ensemble
- Jyotiraditya Scindia carries an onion in his pocket: Why Indians follow this tradition in summer
- Is your child not serious about studies? 5 parental behaviours that could be the reason
- TMC's fort or BJP's breakthrough? The 7 districts that will decide who rules Nabanna
- ‘Baahubali 2’ 9 year anniversary: Top 5 iconic scenes that defined Prabhas’ superstardom
- 5 Pokémon that secretly exist in the real world
- “I’ve been smoking for years and I’m fine”: What doctors say about delayed damage
Up Next
Start a Conversation
Post comment