HC stays KMC order to ropein LIC staff for census duty
Prayagraj: The Allahabad high court has stayed the order, issued by the Kanpur Municipal Corporation (KMC) on May 5, by which the employees of the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) were requisitioned for census duty for Census 2027.
Hearing a special appeal filed by North Central Zone Insurance Employees’ Federation, a division bench comprising Justice Salil Kumar Rai and Justice Swarupama Chaturvedi observed, “A reading of section 7(c) of the Census Act, 1948, shows that though the state govt through its authorized officer may requisition the staff of any establishment, firm or factory for assistance in census operations but the same can only be for the purpose of census operations within the premises of such establishment and not outside the premises.”
“Therefore, the order dated May 5, 2026, prima facie is not within the parameters laid down under Section 7(c) of the Census Act, 1948,” the court said in his order on June 8.
In the special appeal, the employees’ federation had challenged the single-judge order dated May 29, 2026, whereby the court had dismissed the writ petition of the association on the ground that the petitioner had not specifically challenged the order by which the employees of the Life Insurance Corporation were requisitioned for census duty.
During the court proceedings, the counsel for petitioner, Vikrant Pandey, argued that since the employees of LIC did not come within the purview of other authorities, therefore, they cannot be called for census duty.
However, additional solicitor general of India (ASGI), Shashi Prakash Singh, representing the central govt and chief standing counsel, Manoj Kumar Singh, representing the Uttar Pradesh govt, took the plea that since the census operations are of national importance, therefore, no interim order be passed. Advocate Ashish Mishra appeared on behalf of LIC.
Terming the submissions as “not acceptable”, the high court said, “The legality of an order of any state authority is not dependent merely on the purpose of the order but also on whether the order complies with the statutory requirements. We have already noted that, prima facie we find the order bad in law”.
After hearing both the sides, the court noted that the Kanpur Nagar Nigam had no jurisdiction to requisition the employees of
LIC under Section 4 of the Census Act, 1948.
The order is contrary to a division bench judgment dated March 4, 2011, passed by the high court, the court added.
The court said that prima facie, this special appeal required a detailed hearing and added that the case be listed for final hearing on July 6, 2026, before the appropriate bench.
“Therefore, the order dated May 5, 2026, prima facie is not within the parameters laid down under Section 7(c) of the Census Act, 1948,” the court said in his order on June 8.
In the special appeal, the employees’ federation had challenged the single-judge order dated May 29, 2026, whereby the court had dismissed the writ petition of the association on the ground that the petitioner had not specifically challenged the order by which the employees of the Life Insurance Corporation were requisitioned for census duty.
During the court proceedings, the counsel for petitioner, Vikrant Pandey, argued that since the employees of LIC did not come within the purview of other authorities, therefore, they cannot be called for census duty.
However, additional solicitor general of India (ASGI), Shashi Prakash Singh, representing the central govt and chief standing counsel, Manoj Kumar Singh, representing the Uttar Pradesh govt, took the plea that since the census operations are of national importance, therefore, no interim order be passed. Advocate Ashish Mishra appeared on behalf of LIC.
Terming the submissions as “not acceptable”, the high court said, “The legality of an order of any state authority is not dependent merely on the purpose of the order but also on whether the order complies with the statutory requirements. We have already noted that, prima facie we find the order bad in law”.
LIC under Section 4 of the Census Act, 1948.
The order is contrary to a division bench judgment dated March 4, 2011, passed by the high court, the court added.
The court said that prima facie, this special appeal required a detailed hearing and added that the case be listed for final hearing on July 6, 2026, before the appropriate bench.
Comments
Be the first to share a thought and become theFirst Voiceof this News Article
end of article
In Prayagraj
- VHP workers pledge to preserve religious culture
- HC stays KMC order to ropein LIC staff for census duty
- Non-compliance: Kashi police commissioner to appear in HC
- HC orders judicial probe into Jagriti Shukla death case
- Alld HC grants bail to convict in Raju Pal murder case
- Alld HC refuses relief to 6 men convicted for murder 43 yrs ago
- Village security committees to check thefts at temples
Featured In City
- 4 miscreants get into company cab, abduct & rob driver in Bengaluru
- After long wait, mobile networks begin activation on Mumbai Metro 3 underground route
- Patna airport gets additional land to fully utilise parallel taxi track
- My bond with Prime Minister Modi goes beyond Rajya Sabha seat: Deve Gowda
- BJP alleges ₹39,000-cr scam in waste management tender process in Bengaluru, seeks probe
- Shivakumar’s new sops won’t be a burden on exchequer, say experts
- Long night-time power cuts disrupt domestic routines
Photostories
- You don't need a Gout attack to have high Uric Acid: The subtle symptoms doctors don't want you to ignore
- From Vinod Kambli to Virat Kohli; famous cricketers who own luxurious properties in Mumbai’s premium neighbourhoods
- From brightening creams to face serums: Why men’s skincare is finally having its moment in India
- All about ‘How to Train Your Dragon 2’ live-action cast: From Cate Blanchett to Mason Thames
- Sleeping enough but still tired? These vitamin deficiencies could explain why
- Mark Zuckerberg's $300 million superyacht Launchpad: Why everyone is talking about the 'big boat'
- Leaves turning chalky white: Here’s the reason behind it and how to fix it
- Forget the royals, Mahira Khan’s shimmering desi moment at King Charles’ charity dinner made her look like the main event and not a guest
- All about Knox and Vivienne: Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s youngest 17-year-old twins
- 7 budget-friendly localities in Pune for rent in 2026: Affordable areas with strong connectivity
Videos
03:49 From Himanta To Bhupender: Are BJP Leaders Accelerating The TMC Rebellion?05:27 Pakistan Army Mi-17 Helicopter Crashes Near Muzaffarabad, All On Board Killed | Watch02:43 TMC Denies Congress Merger Buzz After Mamata-Sonia, Rahul-Abhishek Meetings | Watch03:51 AI-171 Victims' Families Question Claim Waivers Before Probe Ends; Air India Denies Pressure03:07 After Weeks In Captivity, 14 Freed In Manipur, Search Intensifies For Six Missing Men- Sushmita Dev Quits TMC & Rajya Sabha, Delivering Fresh Blow To Mamata Banerjee As TMC Crisis Deepens
- Paraquat Debate: Why Is India Still Allowing A Herbicide Banned In 74 Countries?
03:41 Narendra Modi Overtakes Jawaharlal Nehru As India's Longest-Serving Democratically Elected PM- POK Protests, Detentions & Killings Vs Zojila Tunnel: Two Very Different Stories Across Kashmir
Hot Picks
Top Trends
Up Next
Follow Us On Social Media