• News
  • World News
  • US News
  • Special Counsel Jack Smith 'bending rules' to damage Trump’s campaign, says CNN analyst

Special Counsel Jack Smith 'bending rules' to damage Trump’s campaign, says CNN analyst

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig criticises Special Counsel Jack Smith for bending legal procedures to undermine Donald Trump’s electoral chances, citing a recent court filing exceeding typical length and procedural irregularities intended to weaken Trump's position ahead of the election.
Special Counsel Jack Smith 'bending rules' to damage Trump’s campaign, says CNN analyst
Special Counsel Jack Smith and former US President Donald Trump
In a recent hearing, CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig accused Special Counsel Jack Smith of bending legal procedures to undermine former US President Donald Trump’s electoral prospects. In a piece for 'New York' magazine titled “Jack Smith’s October Cheap Shot,” Honig criticised Smith’s actions following a new court filing related to Trump’s claim of immunity from prosecution, as reported by Fox News.
Smith, who has brought multiple charges against Trump, submitted a 165-page filing with Judge Tanya Chutkan, exceeding the typical limit of 45 pages.
Judge Chutkan made the bulk of the document public after eliminating several names. This move comes after earlier efforts to fast-track Trump’s immunity hearing ahead of the November 5 presidential election, despite Judge Chutkan now saying she does not consider the election in her rulings.
Honig argues that Smith’s actions are meant to weaken Trump's chances in the upcoming election. "Smith has essentially abandoned any pretense; he'll bend any rule, switch up on any practice — so long as he gets to chip away at Trump's electoral prospects," Honig wrote. He added that this conduct "violates core Department of Justice principles."
In federal criminal procedures, the defence typically files a motion following an indictment, and the prosecution responds. However, according to Honig, Smith overturned this process by filing his brief, without waiting for a defence motion. Although Judge Chutkan admitted the move was "procedurally irregular," she ruled in Smith’s favour.
Smith had earlier raised concerns that Trump's public comments might influence a jury, but now, according to Honig, he is using grand-jury testimony—normally kept secret at this point—in a way that could harm Trump, without giving him the chance to respond or challenge it.
Trump, who has pleaded not guilty to all charges, continues to argue that he is immune from prosecution related to the cases Smith is pursuing.
author
About the Author
TOI World Desk

At TOI World Desk, our dedicated team of seasoned journalists and passionate writers tirelessly sifts through the vast tapestry of global events to bring you the latest news and diverse perspectives round the clock. With an unwavering commitment to accuracy, depth, and timeliness, we strive to keep you informed about the ever-evolving world, delivering a nuanced understanding of international affairs to our readers. Join us on a journey across continents as we unravel the stories that shape our interconnected world.

End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA