wong kim ark

On May 15, 2025, the US Supreme Court began hearing a case challenging President Trump’s executive order to restrict birthright citizenship. The order denies citizenship to children born on US soil unless one parent is a citizen or legal resident, sparking constitutional debates around the 14th Amendment. While the Court is currently reviewing the legality of nationwide injunctions, the case could reshape how federal courts respond to executive orders on immigration and citizenship rights.

The Supreme Court is considering a challenge to birthright citizenship, potentially impacting over 150,000 newborns annually. The case reinterprets the 14th Amendment, with the Trump administration arguing it doesn't apply to children of undocumented immigrants. Justices expressed concerns about the order's clarity and potential for legal chaos, highlighting a stark departure from established precedent.

A federal judge has blocked Donald Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. Judge Deborah Boardman stated that the order conflicts with the 14th Amendment, and no court has endorsed the president's interpretation. The ruling halts the enforcement of Trump's directive indefinitely.

The Supreme Court is considering limiting the scope of injunctions against a Trump administration policy that would deny birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are in the country illegally. This case highlights the plight of immigrants like Barbara, a pregnant Cuban asylum seeker in Kentucky, who fears her child could be born stateless.

A federal judge in Boston will hear a case from 18 state attorneys general seeking to block President Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of undocumented parents. Similar rulings in Seattle and Maryland have already paused the order. The lawsuit argues the order violates the 14th Amendment, which has upheld birthright citizenship since 1868. The Trump administration contends noncitizen children aren't entitled to citizenship.

President Trump's new executive order denies automatic citizenship to certain children born in the US. Immigrants' rights advocates, including the ACLU, have filed a lawsuit, arguing it violates the 14th Amendment. The order has sparked controversy over its interpretation and impact on immigrant families and the principle of birthright citizenship.

In 2025, the US Supreme Court will hear arguments regarding Donald Trump's Executive Order. The EO ended birthright citizenship for children born to non-citizen parents. Lower courts blocked the order. The legal challenges question the 14th Amendment interpretation. The Supreme Court's decision will impact millions, including Indians awaiting green cards. The focus is also on the legality of nationwide injunctions.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court limited federal judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions, a victory for President Trump who criticized lower courts for blocking his policies. The case involved Trump's attempt to revoke birthright citizenship, though the court didn't rule on its constitutionality.

Donald Trump’s executive order aims to end birthright citizenship for children born in the US to parents on temporary visas, scheduled to take effect in February 2025. Legal experts deem the order unconstitutional, emphasizing that birthright citizenship is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment and established statutes.

The US Supreme Court limited lower courts' power to issue nationwide injunctions, impacting immigration law. This allows President Trump's order ending birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants to take effect in 28 states. While the policy remains blocked in 22 states, immigrant rights groups fear legal confusion and potential statelessness for newborns.

President Trump's recent executive order, titled 'Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,' aims to end birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens, including those on temporary visas. This move impacts Indian H-1B visa holders and their families, potentially disrupting their immigration status and future in the US.