Khalistani extremists a ‘security threat’: How Canada’s report backs India’s long-standing concerns
For more than two years, India-Canada relations have been dominated by one deeply contentious issue: Khalistan. What started in September 2023 as a diplomatic standoff over the killing of Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada soon escalated into one of the most serious diplomatic crises the two countries have faced in decades.
Now, the issue has returned to the spotlight following a new report by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). This time, however, the report includes an acknowledgment India has long pressed Ottawa to make publicly — that Canada-based Khalistani extremist groups themselves constitute a security concern for the North American nation.
The report arrives at a delicate moment, as both countries attempt to rebuild ties after years of diplomatic strain. Under Prime Minister Mark Carney, Ottawa has taken cautious steps toward stabilising relations with New Delhi, which had sharply deteriorated during the tenure of his predecessor, Justin Trudeau.
Responding to the report’s recognition of Khalistani extremism, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said: “India has repeatedly urged the Canadian government to take effective action against anti-India extremist elements operating from its soil,” which included, “addressing the issue of glorification of violence, threats against Indian leaders and diplomats, vandalism of places of worship, and attempts to promote secessionism through so-called ‘referendums’.”
For New Delhi, the significance of the CSIS report lies in reinforcing concerns it has consistently raised over the years.
Why it matters
The CSIS 2025 report, tabled in the Canadian Parliament last week, states that the activities of Canada-based Khalistani elements continue to advance a violent extremist agenda.
“Ongoing involvement in violent extremist activities by CBKEs [Canada-based Khalistani extremists] continues to pose a national security threat to Canada and to Canadian interests,” the report says. “Some CBKEs are well connected to Canadian citizens who leverage Canadian institutions to promote their violent extremist agenda and collect funds from unsuspecting community members that are then diverted toward violent activities.”
The wording is significant because India has long argued that extremist organisations were exploiting Canada’s democratic freedoms to mobilise separatist sentiment, intimidate Indian diplomats, and run anti-India campaigns.
The report also revisits the Air India Flight 182 ‘Kanishka’ bombing, calling it “the deadliest terrorist attack in Canadian history.” A total of 329 people, most of them Canadians, were killed in the attack.
That reference carries major historical significance. The bombing, linked to the banned Babbar Khalsa International (BKI), remains one of the darkest episodes in Canada’s security history and has frequently been cited by Indian officials in criticism of Ottawa’s handling of separatist groups.
At the same time, the report draws a clear distinction between peaceful advocacy for Khalistan — the movement seeking a separate Sikh homeland carved out of India — and violent extremism. While Canada continues to regard non-violent political support for Khalistan as protected democratic expression, the report warns that a section of Canada-based Khalistani extremist (CBKE) groups remains associated with violent activities.
“Only a small group of individuals who use Canada as a base to promote, fundraise, or plan violence primarily in India are considered Khalistani extremists.”
What the previous report said
Last September, Canada’s finance department released a report saying that Khalistani extremist groups such as BKI and the International Sikh Youth Federation (ISYF) had received financial support originating from Canada.
The report titled ‘2025 Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks in Canada’, revealed that a politically motivated violent extremism (PMVE) threat has existed in Canada since the mid-1980s, primarily through Khalistani extremists.
According to the report, while PMVE may include religious elements, “actors are more focused on political self-determination or representation, rather than racial or ethnic supremacy”.
In addition to BKI and the ISYF, the report noted that terrorist groups listed under Canada’s Criminal Code, including Hamas and Hezbollah, have also received financial support originating from Canada.
“Khalistani extremist groups are suspected of raising funds in a number of countries, including Canada. These groups previously had an extensive fundraising network in Canada but now appear to consist of smaller pockets of individuals with allegiance to the cause,” the report added.
Despite being more fragmented, these networks continue to raise funds — often targeting diaspora communities — through non-profit organisations and informal channels.
India rejects espionage claims
Meanwhile, the latest CSIS report also includes India among countries allegedly involved in foreign interference and espionage activities in Canada, alongside China, Russia, Iran and Pakistan. India has categorically rejected the allegations.
The CSIS report claims that India had “historically” cultivated covert relationships with Canadian politicians, journalists and members of the Indo-Canadian community to advance its interests.
It has also referred to “transnational repression activities, such as surveillance and other coercive tactics meant to suppress criticism of the Government of India and create fear in the community.”
Reacting to this charge, MEA spokesperson Jaiswal said, “India’s position on this issue has been clear and consistent. We categorically reject such baseless imputations.”
“India is a democracy that adheres to international norms and respects the sovereignty of other nations. It is not our policy to interfere in issues of other countries.
“We believe that any concerns of this nature should be addressed through established mechanisms rather than through politicized or public narratives,” he added.
Interestingly, senior Canadian officials recently softened earlier rhetoric. According to RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme, current investigations do not conclusively connect recent transnational repression cases directly to Indian state actors.
“The dots don’t always connect to a foreign entity,” Duheme said in an interview.
Will Carney launch a crackdown?
The current tensions date back to September 2023, when then Canadian PM Justin Trudeau alleged a “potential” Indian link to the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Khalistan Tiger Force operative, outside a gurdwara in British Columbia.
India reacted sharply, dismissing the accusations as “politically motivated” and “absurd.” What followed was a prolonged diplomatic crisis.
The arrival of Mark Carney as Prime Minister, however, appears to have introduced a more cautious and pragmatic tone. Both governments have quietly tried to rebuild engagement over the past year.
The latest CSIS report may not eliminate the distrust between India and Canada, but it does signal a subtle shift in Ottawa’s public framing of the Khalistan issue.
The report’s reference to extremists exploiting Canadian institutions and democratic freedoms is particularly significant because it echoes concerns New Delhi has repeatedly raised.
For India, however, the core issue remains action rather than acknowledgment, as the MEA spokesperson underlined New Delhi’s repeated appeals to the Canadian government “to take effective action against anti-India extremist elements operating from its soil”.
Whether the report ultimately results in stronger law-enforcement measures, closer scrutiny of extremist financing networks, or deeper intelligence cooperation between the two countries remains to be seen.
With inputs from agencies
The report arrives at a delicate moment, as both countries attempt to rebuild ties after years of diplomatic strain. Under Prime Minister Mark Carney, Ottawa has taken cautious steps toward stabilising relations with New Delhi, which had sharply deteriorated during the tenure of his predecessor, Justin Trudeau.
Responding to the report’s recognition of Khalistani extremism, External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said: “India has repeatedly urged the Canadian government to take effective action against anti-India extremist elements operating from its soil,” which included, “addressing the issue of glorification of violence, threats against Indian leaders and diplomats, vandalism of places of worship, and attempts to promote secessionism through so-called ‘referendums’.”
For New Delhi, the significance of the CSIS report lies in reinforcing concerns it has consistently raised over the years.
The CSIS 2025 report, tabled in the Canadian Parliament last week, states that the activities of Canada-based Khalistani elements continue to advance a violent extremist agenda.
“Ongoing involvement in violent extremist activities by CBKEs [Canada-based Khalistani extremists] continues to pose a national security threat to Canada and to Canadian interests,” the report says. “Some CBKEs are well connected to Canadian citizens who leverage Canadian institutions to promote their violent extremist agenda and collect funds from unsuspecting community members that are then diverted toward violent activities.”
The report also revisits the Air India Flight 182 ‘Kanishka’ bombing, calling it “the deadliest terrorist attack in Canadian history.” A total of 329 people, most of them Canadians, were killed in the attack.
That reference carries major historical significance. The bombing, linked to the banned Babbar Khalsa International (BKI), remains one of the darkest episodes in Canada’s security history and has frequently been cited by Indian officials in criticism of Ottawa’s handling of separatist groups.
At the same time, the report draws a clear distinction between peaceful advocacy for Khalistan — the movement seeking a separate Sikh homeland carved out of India — and violent extremism. While Canada continues to regard non-violent political support for Khalistan as protected democratic expression, the report warns that a section of Canada-based Khalistani extremist (CBKE) groups remains associated with violent activities.
“Only a small group of individuals who use Canada as a base to promote, fundraise, or plan violence primarily in India are considered Khalistani extremists.”
What the previous report said
Last September, Canada’s finance department released a report saying that Khalistani extremist groups such as BKI and the International Sikh Youth Federation (ISYF) had received financial support originating from Canada.
The report titled ‘2025 Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Risks in Canada’, revealed that a politically motivated violent extremism (PMVE) threat has existed in Canada since the mid-1980s, primarily through Khalistani extremists.
According to the report, while PMVE may include religious elements, “actors are more focused on political self-determination or representation, rather than racial or ethnic supremacy”.
In addition to BKI and the ISYF, the report noted that terrorist groups listed under Canada’s Criminal Code, including Hamas and Hezbollah, have also received financial support originating from Canada.
“Khalistani extremist groups are suspected of raising funds in a number of countries, including Canada. These groups previously had an extensive fundraising network in Canada but now appear to consist of smaller pockets of individuals with allegiance to the cause,” the report added.
Despite being more fragmented, these networks continue to raise funds — often targeting diaspora communities — through non-profit organisations and informal channels.
India rejects espionage claims
Meanwhile, the latest CSIS report also includes India among countries allegedly involved in foreign interference and espionage activities in Canada, alongside China, Russia, Iran and Pakistan. India has categorically rejected the allegations.
It has also referred to “transnational repression activities, such as surveillance and other coercive tactics meant to suppress criticism of the Government of India and create fear in the community.”
Reacting to this charge, MEA spokesperson Jaiswal said, “India’s position on this issue has been clear and consistent. We categorically reject such baseless imputations.”
“We believe that any concerns of this nature should be addressed through established mechanisms rather than through politicized or public narratives,” he added.
Interestingly, senior Canadian officials recently softened earlier rhetoric. According to RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme, current investigations do not conclusively connect recent transnational repression cases directly to Indian state actors.
Will Carney launch a crackdown?
The current tensions date back to September 2023, when then Canadian PM Justin Trudeau alleged a “potential” Indian link to the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Khalistan Tiger Force operative, outside a gurdwara in British Columbia.
India reacted sharply, dismissing the accusations as “politically motivated” and “absurd.” What followed was a prolonged diplomatic crisis.
The arrival of Mark Carney as Prime Minister, however, appears to have introduced a more cautious and pragmatic tone. Both governments have quietly tried to rebuild engagement over the past year.
The latest CSIS report may not eliminate the distrust between India and Canada, but it does signal a subtle shift in Ottawa’s public framing of the Khalistan issue.
The report’s reference to extremists exploiting Canadian institutions and democratic freedoms is particularly significant because it echoes concerns New Delhi has repeatedly raised.
For India, however, the core issue remains action rather than acknowledgment, as the MEA spokesperson underlined New Delhi’s repeated appeals to the Canadian government “to take effective action against anti-India extremist elements operating from its soil”.
Whether the report ultimately results in stronger law-enforcement measures, closer scrutiny of extremist financing networks, or deeper intelligence cooperation between the two countries remains to be seen.
With inputs from agencies
Popular from Business
- Big setback for Trump: US court rules 10% global tariffs unlawful
- Top stocks to buy today: Stock recommendations for May 8, 2026 - check list
- Oil prices jump as US-Iran tensions intensify; Brent crude stays beyond $100, WTI up 3%
- From UK, BIS vaults to Indian shores: Why RBI is bringing more & more gold home
- India’s tops global remittance charts with $137 billion inflow from its 19 million strong diaspora
end of article
Trending Stories
- SBI employees’ strike on May 25-26: Why bank staff are protesting, key demands, and will banking services be affected?
- Petrol, Diesel, LPG price today: What are the latest rates on May 7, 2026? Check cost in Delhi, Mumbai & more
- Gold, Silver Rate Today Live Updates: Gold prices near one-week high as Middle East tensions show signs of easing
- Stock Market Live Updates: Sensex up over 100 points, crosses 78,000 mark; Nifty50 opens above 24,350
- Desi rival to Musk’s Starlink? Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance eyes big-bang entry in satcom space; LEO satellites in focus
- Gold price prediction today: Will gold, silver price rally on May 6, 2026 sustain? Check near-term outlook
- Middle East conflict: Three opportunities for India to secure supply chains in energy, fertilizers & defence - explained
Photostories
- GK Fact of the Day: 7 animals that can survive without water for long
- This new Thane- Navi Mumbai corridor could cut your commute by 40 minutes — first stretch opens this year
- These plants are banned from being grown in UK gardens
- 5 smart upcycling DIYs that turn trash into stunning home decor (at a low cost!)
- Are dolphins, sharks, and whales mammals? The answer may surprise you
- ‘Your sister is so much more sensible,’: Why comparing siblings quietly damages both children
- Hollywood momagers: From Sharon Palmer to Jonnetta Patton, all the moms who helped turn their children into stars
- Top K-dramas to watch in the month of May: 'The Wonderfools', 'My Royal Nemesis' and more
- David Attenborough marks 100th birthday: The legendary naturalist shared THIS striking connection with Queen Elizabeth II
- Things you are not allowed to do in your garden in Australia
Up Next
Start a Conversation
Post comment