• News
  • Sports News
  • NHL News
  • Ontario court rules in favor of former Team Canada world junior players in 2018 hockey sexual assault allegations

Ontario court rules in favor of former Team Canada world junior players in 2018 hockey sexual assault allegations

In a closely watched case, five former members of the 2018 Canadian World Junior hockey team were acquitted of sexual assault charges in London, Ontario. Justice Maria Carroccia cited a lack of credible evidence from the complainant, E.M., leading to the acquittal of Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube, and Callan Foote.
Ontario court rules in favor of former Team Canada world junior players in 2018 hockey sexual assault allegations
Sammy Kogan/The Globe and Mail
In a high-profile case that has gripped the Canadian hockey world, five former members of the 2018 Team Canada World Junior roster were acquitted Thursday of all charges related to sexual assault allegations stemming from an incident in London, Ontario. The decision comes after months of legal proceedings, delays, and intense public scrutiny surrounding the role of Hockey Canada and its handling of the case.

Former Team Canada players found not guilty in high-profile 2018 hockey sexual assault trial

Justice Maria Carroccia of the Ontario Court of Justice delivered the ruling, acquitting Michael McLeod, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube, and Callan Foote of all charges related to an alleged group sexual assault that took place following a Hockey Canada gala in June 2018. McLeod had also faced an additional charge of being a party to the offence.The complainant, referred to in court as E.M., alleged that after a night of dancing and drinking at a downtown London bar, she voluntarily accompanied McLeod to a hotel room. There, she claimed, McLeod invited his teammates in, and that multiple players took turns sexually assaulting her over the course of several hours.In delivering her verdict, Justice Carroccia stated she did not find E.M.’s evidence to be “credible or reliable,” leading to the complete acquittal of all five accused.

2018 Hockey Canada sexual assault case marked by trial delays, mistrial, and public scrutiny

The trial began in late April 2025 and was marred by repeated delays, including a mistrial and the dismissal of a second jury. The legal process drew national attention not only because of the players’ identities but also due to broader conversations around accountability in hockey culture and institutional response from organizations like Hockey Canada.The case fueled widespread public debate and prompted federal investigations into how Hockey Canada handled sexual misconduct claims. Though the criminal proceedings have now concluded, civil litigation and internal reviews may still continue in the aftermath of this ruling.With all five former Team Canada players acquitted, the ruling marks the end of a long and closely watched legal chapter. While the players are now cleared of criminal charges, the broader conversation around sexual misconduct in hockey and institutional responsibility is likely far from over.FAQs:1. Were any of the players currently active in the NHL during the trial?No, none of the five players were active in the NHL during the trial. All had either taken leaves of absence or were without NHL contracts at the time.2. Was the complainant identified publicly?No, her identity is protected by a court-imposed publication ban and she was referred to only as “E.M.” throughout the trial.Also Read: Vancouver Canucks interested in free agent forward Jack Roslovic despite tight NHL cap space

For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here.
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
End of Article
Follow Us On Social Media