This story is from October 31, 2008

ECB announces review of Stanford match

The review was ordered as criticism grew of the winner-takes-all series over poor pitches, sub-standard matches, faulty lighting and the behaviour of Allen Stanford.
ECB announces review of Stanford match
The review was ordered as criticism grew of the winner-takes-all series over poor pitches, sub-standard matches, faulty lighting and the behaviour of Allen Stanford.
LONDON: The England Cricket Board has announced a review of a $20 million cricket match between England and West Indies set up to rival the Indian Premier League (IPL) as it faces calls for the resignation of its chairman.
The review was ordered as criticism grew on Wednesday of the winner-takes-all series over poor pitches, sub-standard matches, faulty lighting and the behaviour of Allen Stanford, the Texan billionaire who is bankrolling the event in Antigua.
1x1 polls

Rod Bransgrove, who heads the body responsible for cricket in Hampshire county, said the position of England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) chairman Giles Clarke was in doubt. "I asked the ECB to do a lot more checking on Stanford and this competition. We made it very clear that we should not enter into this agreement without proper checks but he had already done the deal. The board should resign collectively," he told the Daily Telegraph in comments published on Thursday.
The Stanford Series culminates on Saturday with the Twenty20 match between a West Indies and England XI - essentially the national sides - and follows a five-year contract signed between the ECB and Stanford. However, following controversies on and off the pitch, calls have grown for England to review the contract, which has the effect of keeping star England players such as Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff away from the IPL.
"I'm hearing there are serious concerns from the ECB at the manner in which the tournament has been staged," said Jonathan Agnew. "There are lessons to be learned for us all from the events of this week," an ECB spokesman said. "That was always going to be the case because it is new territory for all of us, the ECB and Sir Allen. With four years of the agreement still to run there may be things we can do differently."
A cricket website reported that England players were consulting with their union, the Professional Cricketers' Association, over the whole event. The British press has criticised Stanford's off-field behaviour - the billionaire apologised after being filmed during a game on Monday with his arms around the girlfriend of an England cricketer and the wife of another seated on his lap.
"The tournament has become less and less desirable by the day," The Independent newspaper said, adding the ECB "might have made a catastrophic error of judgement".
"The cricket has largely been of poor quality, the pitch and the floodlights have been criticised, the backer himself was forced to apologise to England for his faintly curious behaviour with some of the players' wives and the players themselves are fed up with being asked about the loot." Even England players have voiced criticism - although muted in their tone.
End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA