This story is from July 28, 2017
Supreme Court passed 1975 ruling months before Emergency
NEW DELHI: A nine-judge Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice J S Khehar was pleasantly surprised to find that the SC had delivered a verdict, believed for the last 40 years to be the foundation of privacy as fundamental right, in the year
The nine-judge bench wanted to know the date of the judgment. When senior advocate C A Sundaram said `Govind vs Madhya Pradesh' judgment, erroneously believed to be the first one to rule privacy as a fundamental right, was delivered on March 18, 1975, the bench broke into a smile. For, Emergency was declared three months later on June 25, 1975. Justice
The surprise was understandable as the Emergency period, from 1975 to 1977, saw brutal abuse of fundamental rights of citizens and arrest and incarceration of political leaders without remedy. When the aggrieved moved high courts, some of them gave relief under the writ of habeas corpus.
Later, in 1976, the SC, in ADM Jabalpur case, succumbed to the powers that be and gave a blot of a ruling that all rights, including right to life, remained suspended during Emergency . It virtually accepted then attorney general Niren De's constitutionally flawed argument that during Emergency, even if a triggerhappy policeman shot a citizen, there was no constitutional remedy available to the victim's kin.
Emergency
was proclaimed.J Chelameswar
said he had pointed this out, as head of a three-judge bench, during the hearing on petitions challenging Aadhaar.The surprise was understandable as the Emergency period, from 1975 to 1977, saw brutal abuse of fundamental rights of citizens and arrest and incarceration of political leaders without remedy. When the aggrieved moved high courts, some of them gave relief under the writ of habeas corpus.
Later, in 1976, the SC, in ADM Jabalpur case, succumbed to the powers that be and gave a blot of a ruling that all rights, including right to life, remained suspended during Emergency . It virtually accepted then attorney general Niren De's constitutionally flawed argument that during Emergency, even if a triggerhappy policeman shot a citizen, there was no constitutional remedy available to the victim's kin.
Top Comment
Aurobindo Banerjee
2679 days ago
It is good that this pre-Emergency decision of the SC has now been ferreted out. We shall eagerly await the Hon''ble SC''s latest decision in this regard, in the context of the challenge inter alia to Aadhaar-PAN linking up.Read allPost comment
Popular from India
- 'EVM tampered when you lose': Supreme Court junks ballot plea
- Maharashtra govt formation: 'Don't gather to clamour for CM post', Shinde tells Sena workers
- Russia eyes India for train manufacturing to meet some domestic demand
- 'Pre-election deal for CM post': Shinde Sena leader's remark revives memories of Uddhav's claim in 2019
- India-Bangladesh tensions mount as Hindu priest jailed for 'sedition'
end of article
Trending Stories
- IPL Auction 2025: Full and final list of sold and unsold players across all teams
- RCB squad, IPL 2025: Royal Challengers Bengaluru final team and projected XI with full list of players and price tags after IPL mega auction
- CSK squad, IPL 2025: Chennai Super Kings final team and projected XI with full list of players and price tags after IPL mega auction
- MI squad, IPL 2025: Mumbai Indians final team and projected XI with full list of players and price tags after IPL mega auction
- Mumbai man awarded life term for killing son over refusal to call stepmom ‘ammi’
- No respect for women, sent nude photos, Renukaswamy was menace to society: Actor Darshan tells Karnataka high court
- Seven-time BJP legislator, Kashi’s ‘Dada’ dies
Visual Stories
- 10 ways to use pumpkin seeds
- 7 things that boys learn from their moms
- 10 Indian breakfast dishes loved across the world
- How to grow onion and garlic on your kitchen window
- Kid-friendly wildlife experiences in India
UP NEXT