This story is from September 18, 2024
Citing cross-border terrorism, India seeks Indus treaty review
India has served a notice to Pakistan for a review and modification of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), calling upon Islamabad to begin negotiations with the Indian government for the same. While India had issued a similar notice for IWT modification last year too, it has cited on this occasion the impact of what official sources called persistent cross-border terrorism as one of the reasons for seeking a review of the World Bank-backed Treaty that has remained invulnerable so far to major and frequent disruptions in bilateral ties.
The fresh notice follows the recent terror attacks in Jammu, after which PM Narendra Modi had accused Pakistan of using terrorism and “proxy war” to remain relevant. However, the trigger for first seeking a modification last year was Pakistan’s “intransigence and unilateral actions” on the issue of Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in J&K. India has been upset that despite the World Bank asking both countries to find a mutually agreeable way to look into Pakistan's objections to the projects, Islamabad had unilaterally sought a parallel process to address the issue.
According to official sources, India’s notification highlights “fundamental and unforeseen changes in circumstances” that require a reassessment of obligations under various Articles of the Treaty. “Among various concerns, important ones include change in population demographics; environmental issues; need to accelerate development of clean energy to meet India’s emission targets and impact of persistent cross border terrorism,” said a source on condition of anonymity.
The IWT provides a framework for irrigation and hydropower development, allocating western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) to Pakistan and the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej) to India.
As the World Bank says, the Treaty also allows each country certain uses of the rivers allocated to the other.
The notice was served to Pakistan on August 30 in line with Article XII(3) of the IWT. Under the Article, according to Indian authorities, the Treaty provisions can be modified by a duly ratified agreement between the 2 governments. The notification disclosure coincided with the first round of voting in the J&K assembly elections.
Government sources also said the notification was issued against the backdrop of the prolonged dispute over the Kishenganga and Ratle Hydro Projects. The World Bank in October 2022 appointed not just a neutral expert that India sought to examine the issue but also, at Pakistan's insistence, a Court of Arbitration chairman, despite acknowledging India's concern that carrying out the two processes concurrently posed practical and legal challenges. The Indian side has, therefore, also called for reconsideration of dispute resolution mechanism under the Treaty, said a source. India has not joined the Court of Arbitration meetings, as it believes it was constituted illegally.
India had in June this year hosted a delegation from Pakistan on water-related bilateral issues under the IWT, which requires the two sides to meet at least once every year, alternately in India and Pakistan. Indus talks backed by the World Bank have not been affected by the turbulent India-Pakistan relations that have otherwise not seen any substantive bilateral engagement between them in the past 9 years, or since the Pathankot terror attack. Pakistan has invited India to the SCO heads of government meeting it will host next month, raising hopes of a high-level visit from India but the Indian government, which is unlikely to skip the meeting because it’s a multilateral event, is yet to take a call on the level of participation.
Select The Times of India as your preferred source on Google Search
The fresh notice follows the recent terror attacks in Jammu, after which PM Narendra Modi had accused Pakistan of using terrorism and “proxy war” to remain relevant. However, the trigger for first seeking a modification last year was Pakistan’s “intransigence and unilateral actions” on the issue of Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric projects in J&K. India has been upset that despite the World Bank asking both countries to find a mutually agreeable way to look into Pakistan's objections to the projects, Islamabad had unilaterally sought a parallel process to address the issue.
According to official sources, India’s notification highlights “fundamental and unforeseen changes in circumstances” that require a reassessment of obligations under various Articles of the Treaty. “Among various concerns, important ones include change in population demographics; environmental issues; need to accelerate development of clean energy to meet India’s emission targets and impact of persistent cross border terrorism,” said a source on condition of anonymity.
The IWT provides a framework for irrigation and hydropower development, allocating western rivers (Indus, Jhelum, Chenab) to Pakistan and the eastern rivers (Ravi, Beas, Sutlej) to India.
As the World Bank says, the Treaty also allows each country certain uses of the rivers allocated to the other.
The notice was served to Pakistan on August 30 in line with Article XII(3) of the IWT. Under the Article, according to Indian authorities, the Treaty provisions can be modified by a duly ratified agreement between the 2 governments. The notification disclosure coincided with the first round of voting in the J&K assembly elections.
Government sources also said the notification was issued against the backdrop of the prolonged dispute over the Kishenganga and Ratle Hydro Projects. The World Bank in October 2022 appointed not just a neutral expert that India sought to examine the issue but also, at Pakistan's insistence, a Court of Arbitration chairman, despite acknowledging India's concern that carrying out the two processes concurrently posed practical and legal challenges. The Indian side has, therefore, also called for reconsideration of dispute resolution mechanism under the Treaty, said a source. India has not joined the Court of Arbitration meetings, as it believes it was constituted illegally.
India had in June this year hosted a delegation from Pakistan on water-related bilateral issues under the IWT, which requires the two sides to meet at least once every year, alternately in India and Pakistan. Indus talks backed by the World Bank have not been affected by the turbulent India-Pakistan relations that have otherwise not seen any substantive bilateral engagement between them in the past 9 years, or since the Pathankot terror attack. Pakistan has invited India to the SCO heads of government meeting it will host next month, raising hopes of a high-level visit from India but the Indian government, which is unlikely to skip the meeting because it’s a multilateral event, is yet to take a call on the level of participation.
Select The Times of India as your preferred source on Google Search
Top Comment
S
Samijsr
509 days ago
This is a serious issue and involved world bank also, I expect both India and Pakistan will consider and think beyond their political gain or loss. We all know that both countries politicians use J&K and blame game on each other for polarization and as political trump card, rather than solving the issues they are want to carry out dispute for political benefit.Read allPost comment
Popular from India
- 'This is the status of the book': Ex-army chief MM Naravane reacts to row over memoir; shares publisher's statement
- 'Could be part of conspiracy': Rohit Pawar raises doubts over Ajit Pawar plane crash
- No-confidence motion: Speaker Om Birla not to preside over proceedings till decision on oppn's notice
- 'Support of all 136 MLAs': Karnataka deputy CM DK Shivakumar amid power tussle over CM post
- Explained: How a no-confidence motion against the Lok Sabha Speaker works — and does oppn have the numbers
end of article
Trending Stories
- T20 WC: NZ chase down 174 in 15.2 overs for a 10-wicket victory over UAE
- Quote of the day by Virat Kohli: 'It's time for the next generation to take over'
- Coco Jones Pregame Performance: Singer shares message of hope after Super Bowl LX; tribute to Whitney Houston
- “I would never want to hear my mother talking about the strip club”: Savannah James sparks debate with viral strip club confession igniting reactions online
- T20 WC: Pakistan finish on 190 for 9 vs USA
- Taylor Swift or Harry Styles – who will headline Super Bowl LXI? Speculations begin as race heats up after Bad Bunny’s halftime show
- “Not the end”: Cam Newton has a surprising change of heart regarding Drake Maye following the Patriots’ Super Bowl LX loss
Featured in India
- ECI extends SIR in poll-bound Bengal by 2 weeks; final rolls on Feb 28
- Rahul Gandhi didn't speak first on budget debate to avoid ‘engineered disruptions': Report
- 'Support of all 136 MLAs': Karnataka deputy CM DK Shivakumar amid power tussle over CM post
- Bharat Taxi takes on aggregators with zero-commission, driver-owned model; national rollout by 2029
- 'Could be part of conspiracy': Rohit Pawar raises doubts over Ajit Pawar plane crash
- 'This is the status of the book': Ex-army chief MM Naravane reacts to row over memoir; shares publisher's statement
Photostories
- Jimin to Suga: BTS’ airport style wins again as the group heads back to Korea
- 8 Most iconic Goddess Durga temples in India and the story behind them
- Why premium electric bikes feel calm even at high speeds
- How to make classic UP-Style Matar Ki Kachori for dinner
- Kim Kardashian's movie appearances and cameos from reality fame to Hollywood spotlight
- What divine energy shapes your life? check your birth date
- 10 famous abbreviations whose full forms most people don’t know
- What is Udan Yatri Cafe, its motive and Raghav Chadha's connection with it
- From hours to minutes: How Delhi-NCR’s air taxi corridor could change commuting
- Chennai metro phase-2: City set for major travel upgrade by 2027
Videos
04:23 Days Before Bangladesh Elections, Another Hindu Businessman Killed, Fears Rise Over Minority Safety05:33 Opposition targets LS Speaker with no-confidence motion — rules, process & numbers – Explained09:32 Pakistan Admits US-Backed Jihad In Afghan Wars A Mistake, But Still Accuses India Of Proxy War03:13 "That Day Will Never Come..." Yogi Adityanath Fires Warning At Those Dreaming Of Babri Structure03:57 Opposition Cites ‘Abuse Of Office’ In No-Confidence Move Against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla07:29 Kanpur Lamborghini Crash: CCTV Backs Police Claim As Lawyer Pushes Driver Defence In Court03:41 After Trump’s Zero Tariff Claim, White House Factsheet Reveals What India-US Trade Deal Really Says08:38 Opposition Doubts Hindi Ability, Indian-Origin MP Ramkissoon’s Reply Leaves Guyana House Silent04:21 ‘A Pre-Committed Purchase Agreement’: Shashi Tharoor Slams Modi Govt Over India-US Trade Deal
Up Next