This story is from August 04, 2022
Uttar Pradesh: Court to hear Gyanvapi case on August 18 as AIM seeks time
VARANASI: The panel of lawyers of Anjuman Intezamia Masajid — the Gyanvapi mosque management committee — on Thursday sought time from the district judge court in view of the untimely death of senior advocate Abhay Nath Yadav, who was representing the committee in the Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri case.
“Considering their plea, the court fixed August 18 as the next date of hearing,” said district government counsel (civil) Mahendra Prasad Pandey.
AIM’s advocate Raees Ahmed said the file of the case 693/2021 Rakhi Singh vs state of UP and others was kept in the chamber of Abhay Nath Yadav, who led the panel of AIM layers challenging the maintainability of this case. He died due to cardiac arrest on July 31. “Thus, there had been no preparation for further arguments and submission by the AIM. On this ground, the court was requested to give 15-day time days for necessary preparations,” he added.
On the directive of the Supreme Court, district judge Ajay Krishna Vishvesha had started hearing of the case from May 20. The district judge was hearing the arguments on maintainability of the case. The AIM advocates led by Yadav had argued for four days between May 24 and July 12.
After it, the advocates of women plaintiffs seeking rights to worship Shringar Gauri in the Gyanvapi compound gave their counter-reply till July 21. In this sequence, the AIM had to give further submissions before the court on Thursday.
IPL 2025 mega auction
AIM’s advocate Raees Ahmed said the file of the case 693/2021 Rakhi Singh vs state of UP and others was kept in the chamber of Abhay Nath Yadav, who led the panel of AIM layers challenging the maintainability of this case. He died due to cardiac arrest on July 31. “Thus, there had been no preparation for further arguments and submission by the AIM. On this ground, the court was requested to give 15-day time days for necessary preparations,” he added.
On the directive of the Supreme Court, district judge Ajay Krishna Vishvesha had started hearing of the case from May 20. The district judge was hearing the arguments on maintainability of the case. The AIM advocates led by Yadav had argued for four days between May 24 and July 12.
After it, the advocates of women plaintiffs seeking rights to worship Shringar Gauri in the Gyanvapi compound gave their counter-reply till July 21. In this sequence, the AIM had to give further submissions before the court on Thursday.
Top Comment
Rop Hod
842 days ago
This is what Muslim did with Ram Mandir case starting 1940's. Soon, they will play victim card in international circles, to defame India in general, and Hindus in particular.Read allPost comment
Popular from City
- Can’t believe Maharashtra would behave with me in this manner: Uddhav Thackeray
- Maharashtra elections: Big guns fail, Congress bastion crumbles
- BJP’s infiltration story lost midway: Jharkhand shows no fear of ‘infiltrators’
- Bengaluru bizwoman was stripped, senior police officer demanded Rs 25 lakh: Kin
- Secunderabad Vande Bharat likely to be replaced with 8-coach rake
end of article
Trending Stories
- IPL Auction 2025 Live: PBKS retain Arshdeep Singh for Rs. 18 crore by using RTM card
- IPL Auction 2025: Who got whom
- IPL 2025 Auction: What is RTM card and how does Right to Match work?
- 'Height of idiocy': Australia's 'awful' attempt to disrupt India and Yashasvi Jaiswal irritates commentator
- IPL Auction 2025 Live Streaming: Date, Time, When and Where to watch on TV and online
- Maharashtra election results: Actress Swara Bhasker blames EVMs after husband Fahad Ahmad's poll defeat
- Maharashtra election results: BJP's best, Congress's worst-ever show in state; 'Traitors' Shinde and Pawar prove they're true heirs
Visual Stories
- 10 ways to use pumpkin seeds
- 7 things that boys learn from their moms
- 10 Indian breakfast dishes loved across the world
- How to grow onion and garlic on your kitchen window
- Kid-friendly wildlife experiences in India
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT