Mosque demolition consent: Court seeks clarity from board

Mosque demolition consent: Court seeks clarity from board
Shimla: A district court has directed the Himachal Pradesh Waqf Board to clarify by Nov 22 under what authority Latif Mohammad and others consented to demolish the top three floors of the controversial Sanjauli mosque, constructed beyond permissible limits.
The court’s directive came during a hearing on an appeal that the All-Himachal Muslim Organisation (AHMO) had filed to challenge an Oct 5 order from Shimla’s municipal commissioner, which had allowed the mosque’s top floors to be removed based on the statements of Latif Mohammad and other members of the committee. AHMO’s advocate Vishva Bhushan argued that Latif was not president of the Sanjauli mosque committee and so he lacked the authority to make statements before the municipal commissioner’s court under Section 18 of the Waqf Act.
The dispute intensified following a massive protest in Sanjauli last week, during which 10 people, including police officers, were injured. Protesters demanded the demolition of the illegally constructed floors, leading Latif and other members of the committee to agree to carry out the demolition themselves. The case highlights ongoing tensions over unauthorised construction in Shimla, raising questions about governance, legal processes, and communal harmony in the region.
We also published the following articles recently

'Had I been in power...': Rashid Latif furious over India's stand for Champions Trophy
Former Pakistani cricketer Rashid Latif has sparked controversy by suggesting Pakistan should cease playing cricket against India. Latif criticized the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for refusing to send their team to Pakistan for the Champions Trophy, citing security concerns. He questioned the BCCI's motives and highlighted the ICC's security clearance for Pakistan.
Waqf board is claiming land of other religions
Union Minister Shobha Karandlaje has accused the waqf board of attempting to claim ownership of land belonging to temples, churches, and other communities. She compared the situation to "love jihad" and questioned the waqf board's significant increase in land holdings since 1954. Karandlaje expressed the central government's support for those denied justice.
Demolition of properties: Why Supreme Court declared 'bulldozer justice' illegal
The Supreme Court issued strict guidelines to halt the unlawful demolition of homes belonging to accused individuals. The court emphasized that everyone has the right to due process and shelter, condemning the executive branch's overreach in bypassing judicial procedures. The judgment mandates a 15-day notice period for demolition, compensation for victims, and accountability for officials involved in arbitrary actions.
End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA