HC upholds penalty on ex-DCLR for RTI delay

A former deputy collector in Patna faces a Rs25,000 fine from the High Court for failing to adhere to the RTI Act's requirement for timely information disclosure. The penalty, initially imposed by the State Information Commissioner, reflects the court's condemnation of the officer's lack of professionalism in handling public inquiries.
HC upholds penalty on ex-DCLR for RTI delay
A former deputy collector in Patna faces a Rs25,000 fine from the High Court for failing to adhere to the RTI Act's requirement for timely information disclosure. The penalty, initially imposed by the State Information Commissioner, reflects the court's condemnation of the officer's lack of professionalism in handling public inquiries.
Patna: Refusing to quash a penalty of Rs25,000 imposed by the state information commissioner (SIC) on a former deputy collector land reforms (DCLR) of the state capital (sadar), the Patna high court directed the erring officer to deposit the fine amount within next four weeks.The court also ordered that failure to deposit the fine within stipulated time would make the officer liable for an additional fine of Rs5,000.A single bench of Justice Rajiv Roy while disposing of a decade-old writ petition filed by one Sudhanshu Kumar Chaubey, passed this verdict on Dec 4 which came into public domain after being uploaded on HC website on Tuesday.Petitioner’s counsel Pawan Kumar argued that his client had wrongly been imposed with a fine allegedly for not furnishing information related to disposal of mutation cases in a circle of state capital, as sought by one Surendra Prasad Yadav under the provisions of Right to Information Act (RTI) .The requisite information was provided at a late stage when Surendra had already appealed before the SIC.SIC counsel Binita Singh submitted that Sudhanshu was given an opportunity give an explanation before being awarded a penalty. Yet the erring officer gave no reply for next 11 months till he was transferred to another department.The court found that the erring officer had behaved in a non-professional manner by not replying to the commission within time frame.
author
About the AuthorDev Kumar

A practising advocate at the Patna High Court. Associated with TOI, Patna, since January 2022 and has been contributing news reports/stories emanating from the Patna High Court to TOI Patna only.

End of Article
Follow Us On Social Media