This story is from November 04, 2016
Bailable warrant against JDA officials in Rajmahal Palace land row
JAIPUR: A lower court on Friday issued bailable warrants against five Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) officials, including former commissioner Shikhar Agarwal, for forcibly taking possession of the disputed land around Sujan
The
The order said a competent court had issued decree in favour of the petitioner on November 24, 2011 and the JDA was restrained from creating hurdles to the petitioner in appropriating the property. The JDA had not obtained any stay order from higher court against the decree of 2011 and forcefully entered the property on August 28 and demolished servant quarters and other constructions there. The officials also sealed the gates of the property, making it inaccessible to the petitioner. They also resorted to criminal intimidation of the witnesses, the court noted.
The court said the accused were aware of the decree of 2011 and knowingly violated it, which makes their crime more serious. The court asked if a public servant does not respect a court decree, what is its relevance.
Rajmahal Palace
hotel on August 28. The other officials against whom bailable warrants were issued included formerJDA
secretary Pawan Arora, SP JDA Rahul Jain, Deputy Commissioner Zone-1 Vishnu Kumar Goyal and Enforcement officerVed Prakash Goyal
on a petition by Narayan Singh, the power of attorney holder of hotel owner Padmanabh Singh.Jaipur Metropolitan Court
(No 11), while taking cognizance against the officials under different sections of IPC, including wrongful restraint (341), mischief causing damage (427), criminal trespass (447), criminal intimidation (506), public servants framing incorrect documents (167 and criminal conspiracy (120b), summoned the five officials against bailablewarrant
of Rs 20,000 each on November 25.The order said a competent court had issued decree in favour of the petitioner on November 24, 2011 and the JDA was restrained from creating hurdles to the petitioner in appropriating the property. The JDA had not obtained any stay order from higher court against the decree of 2011 and forcefully entered the property on August 28 and demolished servant quarters and other constructions there. The officials also sealed the gates of the property, making it inaccessible to the petitioner. They also resorted to criminal intimidation of the witnesses, the court noted.
The court said the accused were aware of the decree of 2011 and knowingly violated it, which makes their crime more serious. The court asked if a public servant does not respect a court decree, what is its relevance.
Popular from City
- Secunderabad Vande Bharat likely to be replaced with 8-coach rake
- Self-drive trip to Madikeri turns nightmare: Bengaluru students assaulted, extorted Rs 50,000 by rental agents
- Multi-model transit hubs at five key junctions to be linked with Delhi-Alwar rapid rail
- 'Personal number shown in film': Chennai student sues Amaran makers of Rs 1.1 crore after calls flooded from Sai Pallavi fans
- Noida-Gr Noida Metro gets nod for extension
end of article
Trending Stories
- Why Elon Musk's ex-girlfriend Grimes says he is 'not the man she fell in love with'
- Who is Nikita Hand, the woman who won a civil lawsuit against MMA fighter Conor McGregor
- Justin Trudeau dances and grooves at Taylor Swift's concert amid Montreal protests; watch video
- Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy know many federal employees will quit because...
- Pam Bondi says there is 'no legal basis' to keep names private in Jeffrey Epstein documents
- Republican senators eager to see Tulsi Gabbard's FBI file because of her Snowden stance
- MSNBC's Joy Reid says Trump govt would shoot Americans; gives Thanksgiving warning to Republicans
Visual Stories
- 10 ways to use pumpkin seeds
- 7 things that boys learn from their moms
- 10 Indian breakfast dishes loved across the world
- How to grow onion and garlic on your kitchen window
- Kid-friendly wildlife experiences in India
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment