Madras high court upholds ED's power to issue repeated summonses in money laundering case
CHENNAI: The Madras high court has made it clear that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) is empowered to issue repeated summonses to a person accused of money laundering, even after filing a complaint before a jurisdictional court.
A division bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice M Jothiraman made the observation while dismissing pleas moved by P Palanichamy of PRP Granites and two others seeking to quash summonses issued by the ED in connection with a granite quarrying scam in 2020.
According to the petitioners, they already complied with the summons issued by the ED, but the agency is issuing repeated summonses seeking the same documents of the properties.
Opposing the plea, counsel for the ED, Rajnish Pathiyil, submitted that money laundering is a continuing offence and, therefore, the agency is empowered to issue summonses under section 50 (2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for holding further investigations even after the complaint is filed in the court.
Recording the submissions, the bench relied on the judgement of the Supreme Court in the Vijay Madanlal case and observed that the offence of money laundering is a continuing offence and the power to conduct further investigation exists. Therefore, this court does not find any infirmity in conducting further investigation by issuing summonses to any person under Section 50 (2) of the PMLA.
According to the petitioners, they already complied with the summons issued by the ED, but the agency is issuing repeated summonses seeking the same documents of the properties.
Opposing the plea, counsel for the ED, Rajnish Pathiyil, submitted that money laundering is a continuing offence and, therefore, the agency is empowered to issue summonses under section 50 (2) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for holding further investigations even after the complaint is filed in the court.
Recording the submissions, the bench relied on the judgement of the Supreme Court in the Vijay Madanlal case and observed that the offence of money laundering is a continuing offence and the power to conduct further investigation exists. Therefore, this court does not find any infirmity in conducting further investigation by issuing summonses to any person under Section 50 (2) of the PMLA.
Popular from City
- 'We are shocked': Hospitals ‘in mess’, strange Delhi govt refusing central aid, observes HC
- At 8.9°C, Pune colder than J&K’s Katra and Himachal Pradesh's Dharamshala
- Congress faces pressure to restore 4% Muslim reservation after bypoll success
- Bangladesh response on monk Chinmoy Krishna Das’s arrest ‘highly frustrating, worrying’: Iskcon Kolkata
- Chennai: Gym trainer held for rape, fake promise
end of article
Trending Stories
- IPL Auction 2025: Full and final list of sold and unsold players across all teams
- IPL Auction 2025: Full updated squads, players list, and final teams of all 10 IPL franchises after mega auction
- MI full squad, IPL 2025: Mumbai Indians squad with list of players retained, released and bought at IPL 2025 mega auction
- CSK full squad, IPL 2025: Chennai Super Kings squad with list of players retained, released and bought at IPL 2025 mega auction
- 9 Ways Students Can Sharpen Their Memory for Board Exams
- WATCH: Wasim Akram explains why Jasprit Bumrah is a terror with the ball
- 'What wrong have I done ...': Prithvi Shaw breaks silence
Visual Stories
- 5 fruits one can grow in the balcony garden with ease (and how)
- 10 lesser-known breakfast dishes from Maharashtra
- 7 best food for kids to improve brain power early on
- 10 habits of parents that raises well-behaved kids
- How to grow Peace lily at home and make it flower quickly
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment