This story is from September 11, 2018
'Suppliers to pay penalty for not passing GST rate cuts'
NEW DELHI: In a first of its kind ruling, the
The NAA gave its ruling in a case against Jaipur-based Sharma Trading Company, wherein it was alleged that the supplier had not reduced the price of 'Vaseline' in line with the reduction of GST rate and thus indulged in profiteering in contravention of Scetion 171 of
The application, which was filed by a departmental store, was examined by Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering and was referred to Directorate General of Anti Profiteering (DGAP) for detailed investigation.
The DGAP found that the quantum of benefit was not passed to the departmental store by the supplier on November 15, 2017 following reduction of GST rate to 18% from 28%.
Sharma Trading Company, the distributor and stockist of Hindustan Unilever (HUL), had contended that it has purchased from HUL the product on which GST was levied at 28% and sold the same to the departmental store. It also contended that profit was made by HUL and not Sharma Trading.
The NAA, in its 24-page order, said that Sharma Trading will be liable to pay penalty under section 122 of CGST Act. As per Section 122 supplier of any goods or services without issue of invoice or incorrect / false invoice is liable to pay "a penalty of Rs 10,000 or an amount equivalent to the tax evaded or the tax not reduced under section 31 or short-deducted or deducted but not paid to the government..., whichever is higher".
National Anti Profiteering Authority
(NAA
) on Monday ruled that suppliers will be liable to pay penalty for not passing the benefits of GST rate reduction on sale of goods.IPL 2025 mega auction
The NAA gave its ruling in a case against Jaipur-based Sharma Trading Company, wherein it was alleged that the supplier had not reduced the price of 'Vaseline' in line with the reduction of GST rate and thus indulged in profiteering in contravention of Scetion 171 of
CGST Act
.The DGAP found that the quantum of benefit was not passed to the departmental store by the supplier on November 15, 2017 following reduction of GST rate to 18% from 28%.
Sharma Trading Company, the distributor and stockist of Hindustan Unilever (HUL), had contended that it has purchased from HUL the product on which GST was levied at 28% and sold the same to the departmental store. It also contended that profit was made by HUL and not Sharma Trading.
Top Comment
Viswanathan Iyer
2267 days ago
There should be strict rules so that consumers also get the benefits of GST.Read allPost comment
Popular from Business
- Wall Street: Dow Jones ends at fresh record
- Stock market today: BSE Sensex surges ends 993 points up; Nifty50 above 24,200 as bulls charge back
- Bitcoin’s rally stalls after nearing the historic $100000 level
- India invested $14 trillion since independence, over 50% in the last decade: Report
- Private equity-venture capital funds dry up: Worst year since 2019
end of article
Trending Stories
- Will banks open only for 5 days a week? Here’s what you should know about IBA’s proposal
- India set to be third largest economy, says S&P Global
- Dalal Street bull run continues! BSE Sensex crosses 69,000 for the first time; Nifty above 20,800
- Byju’s reduces notice period for employees as troubles mount
03:08 Sensex surges over 900 points, Nifty above 20,550 as BJP state election wins bolster Modi's Lok Sabha 2024 prospects- UltraTech to buy building materials business of Kesoram in 7,600 crore deal
- Tata Technologies stock debuts at a bumper 140% premium; share price at Rs 1200 on BSE
Visual Stories
- NEET UG 2024 result awaited: Top 10 NIRF-ranked medical colleges of India
- 7 New Expected Bullet Train Routes in India
- 10 Upcoming High-Speed Expressways That Will Change Highway Travel In India
- 8 Transformational Indian Railways Projects You Shouldn’t Miss
- Why Sensex, Nifty50 Hit New Highs, M-Cap At $5 Trillion: Top Reasons
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT