Trump administration blocked from cutting local health funding for four municipalities
A federal court has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from clawing back millions in public health funding from four Democrat-led municipalities in GOP-governed states.
It's the second such federal ruling to reinstate public health funding for several states.
US District Judge Christopher Cooper in Washington, DC, issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday sought by district attorneys in Harris County, Texas, home to Houston, and three cities: Columbus, Ohio, Nashville, Tennessee, and Kansas City, Missouri. The decision means the federal government must reinstate funding to the four municipalities until the case is fully litigated.
"The federal government cannot simply ignore Congress and pull the plug on essential services that communities rely on," Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee said. "Today's decision ensures we can keep doing the work that protects our residents - from tracking disease outbreaks to providing vaccinations and supporting vulnerable families."
Their lawsuit, filed in late April, alleged $11 billion in cuts to US centres for disease control and prevention programs had already been approved by Congress and are being unconstitutionally withheld. They also argued that the administration's actions violate department of health and human services regulations.
The cities and counties argued the cuts were "a massive blow to US public health at a time where state and local public health departments need to address burgeoning infectious diseases and chronic illnesses, like the measles, bird flu, and mpox." The cuts would lead to thousands of state and local public health employees being fired, the lawsuit argued.
The local governments, alongside the American federation of state, county and municipal employees union, wanted the court to reinstate the grants nationwide. But Cooper said in his preliminary injunction that the funds can only be blocked to the four municipalities and in a May 21 hearing expressed skepticism about whether it could apply more widely.
The funding in question was granted during the Covid-19 pandemic but aimed at building up public health infrastructure overall, Menefee said in a statement in April.
The four local governments were owed about $32.7 million in future grant payments, Cooper's opinion notes.
The federal government's lawyers said the grants were legally cut because, "Now that the pandemic is over, the grants and cooperative agreements are no longer necessary as their limited purpose has run out." They used the same argument in the case brought by 23 states and the District of Columbia over the HHS funding clawback.
Menefee said the cuts defunded programs in Harris County for wastewater disease surveillance, community health workers and clinics and call centres that helped people get vaccinated. Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein said the cuts forced the city to fire 11 of its 22 infectious disease staffers.
Nashville used some of its grant money to support programs, including a "strike team" that after the pandemic addressed gaps in health services that kept kids from being able to enrol in school, according to the lawsuit.
Kansas City used one of its grants to build out capabilities to test locally for Covid-19, influenza and measles rather than waiting for results from the county lab. The suit details that after four years of work to certify facilities and train staff, the city "was at the final step" of buying lab equipment when the grant was canceled.
Representatives for HHS, the CDC and the cities did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
US District Judge Christopher Cooper in Washington, DC, issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday sought by district attorneys in Harris County, Texas, home to Houston, and three cities: Columbus, Ohio, Nashville, Tennessee, and Kansas City, Missouri. The decision means the federal government must reinstate funding to the four municipalities until the case is fully litigated.
"The federal government cannot simply ignore Congress and pull the plug on essential services that communities rely on," Harris County Attorney Christian Menefee said. "Today's decision ensures we can keep doing the work that protects our residents - from tracking disease outbreaks to providing vaccinations and supporting vulnerable families."
Their lawsuit, filed in late April, alleged $11 billion in cuts to US centres for disease control and prevention programs had already been approved by Congress and are being unconstitutionally withheld. They also argued that the administration's actions violate department of health and human services regulations.
The cities and counties argued the cuts were "a massive blow to US public health at a time where state and local public health departments need to address burgeoning infectious diseases and chronic illnesses, like the measles, bird flu, and mpox." The cuts would lead to thousands of state and local public health employees being fired, the lawsuit argued.
The local governments, alongside the American federation of state, county and municipal employees union, wanted the court to reinstate the grants nationwide. But Cooper said in his preliminary injunction that the funds can only be blocked to the four municipalities and in a May 21 hearing expressed skepticism about whether it could apply more widely.
The four local governments were owed about $32.7 million in future grant payments, Cooper's opinion notes.
The federal government's lawyers said the grants were legally cut because, "Now that the pandemic is over, the grants and cooperative agreements are no longer necessary as their limited purpose has run out." They used the same argument in the case brought by 23 states and the District of Columbia over the HHS funding clawback.
Menefee said the cuts defunded programs in Harris County for wastewater disease surveillance, community health workers and clinics and call centres that helped people get vaccinated. Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein said the cuts forced the city to fire 11 of its 22 infectious disease staffers.
Nashville used some of its grant money to support programs, including a "strike team" that after the pandemic addressed gaps in health services that kept kids from being able to enrol in school, according to the lawsuit.
Kansas City used one of its grants to build out capabilities to test locally for Covid-19, influenza and measles rather than waiting for results from the county lab. The suit details that after four years of work to certify facilities and train staff, the city "was at the final step" of buying lab equipment when the grant was canceled.
Representatives for HHS, the CDC and the cities did not immediately respond to requests for comment Tuesday.
Popular from Business
- DGCA: No major safety concerns found in Air India’s Boeing 787 fleet after enhanced checks
- Unbelievable! Stock of herbal medicine company, with zero revenue, rallies whopping 46,000% - what’s causing this surprising rise?
- ITR filing FY 2024-25: Do you need to file your income tax return if TDS has been deducted? Explained
- India’s first bullet train project gets a boost! Siemens consortium bags contract for ETCS Level 2 signalling; order valued at Rs 4,100 crore
- Cheer for passengers! Indian Railways to roll out 50 Namo Bharat AC trains; 100 new MEMUs for short distance travel
end of article
Trending Stories
- Top stocks to buy today: Stock recommendations for June 18, 2025 - check list
- Cheer for passengers! Indian Railways to roll out 50 Namo Bharat AC trains; 100 new MEMUs for short distance travel
- Iran-Israel conflict: How will blocking of Strait of Hormuz hit India? Indian refiners look at alternative routes for fuel supply
- Gold price prediction today: What will be the impact of Iran-Israel conflict - where are gold rates headed on June 17, 2025 and in the near-term?
- Stock market today: Nifty50 above 24,900; BSE Sensex opens on a choppy note
- Top stocks to buy today: Stock market recommendations for June 17, 2025 - check list
- Iran-Israel conflict impact: Basmati rice prices to drop as exports to Iran, third largest buyer of Indian basmati, expected to decline
Visual Stories
- Pooja Hegde in gorgeous Kanjivaram sarees
- Tamannaah Bhatia and her love for black attires
- These 4 Zodiac Signs Take Bold Decisions — Regret Is Not in Their Dictionary
- Pooja Hegde’s Mesmerising Saree Styles Radiate Pure Grace
- 10 baby girl names inspired by Greek goddesses
Photostories
- This Bollywood actor delivered 33 flops in a row, yet rose to win national awards and remain a timeless star
- Nayanthara and Vignesh Shivan, Allu Arjun and Sneha Reddy, Jyotika and Suriya: South Indian Couples Who Rule Hearts Across Regions
- Iconic Bollywood dialogues that went beyond screen
- Civets vs mongooses: What’s the difference between these two sneaky mammals?
- 6 popular brands that have recently changed their logos and why
- Numerology Predictions Today, June 18, 2025: Read your personalized forecast for numbers 1 to 9
- How to style your old wedding lehenga
- 5 things that NEET UG topper ‘Avika Aggarwal’ did differently while preparing for exams
- 5 early symptoms of Thyroid Cancer that are easy to miss
- Sargun Mehta’s timeless appeal never fades
Top Trends
Up Next
Start a Conversation
Post comment