'Immigrant could become public charge': Getting US visa could soon be harder for many – Who's affected?
A new directive from the Trump administration could make it harder for foreigners with certain health conditions to obtain visas to live in the United States. The State Department has instructed consular officers worldwide to weigh applicants’ medical histories and their ability to afford treatment when deciding visa eligibility — a move critics say could open the door to discrimination and arbitrary decisions.
The State Department has directed visa officers to “consider an applicant’s health” when assessing whether they could become a “public charge” — someone likely to rely on government assistance.
The guidance lists several conditions that could be factored into decisions, including cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, cancers, diabetes, metabolic and neurological disorders, and mental health conditions. It also flags obesity, citing its links to high blood pressure, sleep apnea, and asthma.
"You must consider an applicant's health," the advisory read. "Certain medical conditions, including, but not limited to, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, cancers, diabetes, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, and mental health conditions, can require hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of care, " as reported by CBS News.
Officers have been told to examine whether an applicant or their dependents might require “expensive, long-term care,” and whether they can afford treatment without depending on public programs such as Medicaid.
Also read: US to deny visas to people with diabetes, heart disease and other chronic illnesses
It is not yet clear whether the directive will extend to temporary visa categories such as tourist or student visas. While the language technically covers all visa applicants — including those applying for short-term stays like B-1/B-2 (tourism or business) and F-1 (student) visas — officials are expected to apply it primarily to individuals seeking permanent residency in the United States.
Currently, tourist visa applicants must already prove they have adequate financial resources for their visit, intend to return home after their authorized stay, and will not become a “public charge” during their time in the country.
Health checks have long been part of the immigration process. Applicants for US visas and green cards must undergo medical examinations by approved physicians to screen for communicable diseases such as tuberculosis and to verify vaccination records.
What’s new is the expansion of what counts as a potential health risk. The latest directive allows consular officers to consider a broader range of chronic and non-communicable conditions and to make subjective judgments about how much future care might cost. Experts say that gives officers far more discretion than before — and without medical training, those judgments could easily be inconsistent or biased.
Immigration attorney Charles Wheeler of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network called the directive “troubling,” noting that officers “are not medically trained” to predict how a person’s health might progress, as reported by CBS News. The guidance, he said, instructs visa officers to form “their own thoughts about what could lead to some sort of medical emergency or sort of medical costs in the future.” He added, “That’s troubling because they’re not medically trained, they have no experience in this area, and they shouldn’t be making projections based on their own personal knowledge or bias.”
Sophia Genovese, an immigration lawyer at Georgetown University, said the language effectively encourages officials to “speculate on the cost of applicants’ medical care” and could lead to unpredictable outcomes.
The new guidance echoes and expands upon the controversial “public charge” rule introduced during Trump’s earlier term, which made it harder for immigrants to obtain green cards if they had used, or were likely to use, public benefits like Medicaid or housing aid.
That rule was rolled back by the Biden administration in 2022, narrowing its scope to people primarily dependent on government cash assistance. The latest directive revives the concept in a broader form — explicitly linking health conditions, age, and financial self-sufficiency to an applicant’s eligibility.
A State Department official told The Hill that visa decisions would still be made on a “case-by-case basis” and that simply having a medical condition would not automatically disqualify anyone. Instead, the key factor would be whether the applicant could cover their medical costs “over their expected lifespan” without government help.
Immigrant rights advocates warn that the directive could disproportionately impact applicants from lower-income countries, where access to private healthcare is limited. It could also discourage individuals from disclosing medical conditions or seeking treatment out of fear it may harm their immigration prospects.
What the new guidance says
The State Department has directed visa officers to “consider an applicant’s health” when assessing whether they could become a “public charge” — someone likely to rely on government assistance.
"You must consider an applicant's health," the advisory read. "Certain medical conditions, including, but not limited to, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, cancers, diabetes, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, and mental health conditions, can require hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of care, " as reported by CBS News.
Officers have been told to examine whether an applicant or their dependents might require “expensive, long-term care,” and whether they can afford treatment without depending on public programs such as Medicaid.
Who all would be affected by the new rule?
Currently, tourist visa applicants must already prove they have adequate financial resources for their visit, intend to return home after their authorized stay, and will not become a “public charge” during their time in the country.
What’s new here
Health checks have long been part of the immigration process. Applicants for US visas and green cards must undergo medical examinations by approved physicians to screen for communicable diseases such as tuberculosis and to verify vaccination records.
What’s new is the expansion of what counts as a potential health risk. The latest directive allows consular officers to consider a broader range of chronic and non-communicable conditions and to make subjective judgments about how much future care might cost. Experts say that gives officers far more discretion than before — and without medical training, those judgments could easily be inconsistent or biased.
Immigration attorney Charles Wheeler of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network called the directive “troubling,” noting that officers “are not medically trained” to predict how a person’s health might progress, as reported by CBS News. The guidance, he said, instructs visa officers to form “their own thoughts about what could lead to some sort of medical emergency or sort of medical costs in the future.” He added, “That’s troubling because they’re not medically trained, they have no experience in this area, and they shouldn’t be making projections based on their own personal knowledge or bias.”
Sophia Genovese, an immigration lawyer at Georgetown University, said the language effectively encourages officials to “speculate on the cost of applicants’ medical care” and could lead to unpredictable outcomes.
A return to the ‘public charge’ rule
The new guidance echoes and expands upon the controversial “public charge” rule introduced during Trump’s earlier term, which made it harder for immigrants to obtain green cards if they had used, or were likely to use, public benefits like Medicaid or housing aid.
That rule was rolled back by the Biden administration in 2022, narrowing its scope to people primarily dependent on government cash assistance. The latest directive revives the concept in a broader form — explicitly linking health conditions, age, and financial self-sufficiency to an applicant’s eligibility.
A State Department official told The Hill that visa decisions would still be made on a “case-by-case basis” and that simply having a medical condition would not automatically disqualify anyone. Instead, the key factor would be whether the applicant could cover their medical costs “over their expected lifespan” without government help.
Why it matters
The policy could have sweeping implications for those seeking to immigrate permanently to the United States, particularly older applicants or people with chronic illnesses. With roughly 10 per cent of the world’s population living with diabetes and nearly 40 per cent of Americans considered obese, the rule potentially touches a vast number of visa hopefuls.Immigrant rights advocates warn that the directive could disproportionately impact applicants from lower-income countries, where access to private healthcare is limited. It could also discourage individuals from disclosing medical conditions or seeking treatment out of fear it may harm their immigration prospects.
Top Comment
M
Muralidharan Mahalingam Mahalingam
3 hours ago
Now only what is left is to ensure that immigrants & non-immigrants do not die on US soil !! Only such applicants who can prove about their immortality can qualify for a visa !!Read allPost comment
Popular from World
- From toasted to roasted: Trump wines sales in military cantonments invite flak
- Hundreds of cops resign ahead of Zohran Mamdani’s term in NYC: ‘How do you work for a mayor who wants to defund police?’
- US to deny visas to people with diabetes, heart disease and other chronic illnesses
- Tampa tragedy: Speeding car fleeing police ploughs into crowd outside bar in Ybor City; four dead, 11 injured
- YouTuber Candace Owens fires back at Ben Shapiro after he claims she accused Erika Kirk of killing Charlie Kirk
end of article
Trending Stories
- YouTuber Candace Owens fires back at Ben Shapiro after he claims she accused Erika Kirk of killing Charlie Kirk
- Jack Dorsey on Elon Musk's $1 trillion pay package: ‘This is not about compensation. It's about …’
- Connor McDavid’s wife Lauren Kyle drops ‘Oilers Collection 03’—A racing-inspired fashion release by Sports Club Atelier
- Hundreds of cops resign ahead of Zohran Mamdani’s term in NYC: ‘How do you work for a mayor who wants to defund police?’
- Megan Thee Stallion receives heartfelt apology from boyfriend Klay Thompson after airport pickup mishap
- US to deny visas to people with diabetes, heart disease and other chronic illnesses
- Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to Mark Zuckerberg: I would have dropped out of college, if I had known …
Featured in world
- Can't move to Pakistan: Man who caused five-vehicle crash, killed 1, allowed to stay in Canada; wife says children don't know Urdu
- MAGA commentator pitches JD Vance–Sydney Sweeney 2028 run; TV host jokes ‘Rubio might not like that’
- UAE tightens freelance visa procedures, denies suspension rumours
- Nikki Glaser: What you need to know about her net worth and relationships
- Ukrainian strikes leave Russian cities in dark: Drone attacks disrupt power; thousands face blackout
- Dubai Ruler Sheikh Mohammed shares video revealing a day in the life of Dubai Metro
Photostories
- From not having enough money to buy a house to putting in their entire savings; Rohit Purohit and Sheena Bajaj’s white haven in Mumbai
- 5 foods that secretly make your face bloated and what to eat instead
- How to make mornings easier before school: 10 real-life tips for moms and dads that actually work
- 'Laal Singh Chaddha', 'Action Replayy', 'Dil Bole Hadippa!': Bollywood remakes of Hollywood hits that failed to impress at the box office
- Shopping a little too much online? 8 creative ways to use discarded delivery packaging
- Shanaya Kapoor to Janhvi Kapoor: 5 looks of the day that are setting major fashion goals
- Bigg Boss Malayalam 7: Finalist Nevin’s charming weekend looks
- Was walking the key to Steve Jobs’s genius? Stanford study reveals 4 ways it boosts creativity
- Bigg Boss Malayalam 7: Here’s a look at the stunning transformation of the finalists over the season
- Toll time: Dwarka E-way free ride ends next week; check how much you will have to pay
Videos
03:51 'Surrender Not In Our Playbook': Hamas Rejects Idea Of Laying Down Arms In Rafah Amid Tunnel Fight03:50 Lavrov Shows Trump The Mirror; ‘US Failed & Now Lecturing…’: Explosive Jab Over Truce Chaos04:41 'Another Gaza': Petro Calls Trump A 'Liar' | Blasts U.S. Missile Strikes In Caribbean On Alleged Drug Boats05:33 Monster Fung-Wong Storm Tears Into Philippines; 1,000,000 Obliterated By Super Typhoon04:38 Saudi Crown Prince Defies Trump Pressure, Refuses Israel Ties Without Palestinian Statehood Roadmap - Report12:10 'Don't Mess With Us': California Gov Newsom Pokes Fun At Trump In Savage Houston Speech06:35 U.S Senate Emergency: Chuck Schumer Makes Big Shutdown Offer To Republicans; 'Waiting For Yes'04:04 Trump Sends B-52 Subsonic Bombers To NATO Flank As Russia Mulls Retaliatory Nuke Tests04:23 US & Israel On Alert; Iran’s Russian-made Su-35 Fighter Jets To Be Armed With Deadly R-37M Missiles?
Up Next