This story is from September 19, 2020
Epic political and ideological fight shaping up after Ginsburg's death
WASHINGTON
: The body had barely turned cold when the political and ideological fight erupted. For conservative Republicans, the death of liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth BaderGinsburg
from pancreatic cancer on Friday night provided an opening to ram home their existing 5-4 advantage on the bench to 6-3, with a replacement nomination and confirmation before a new Presidential term on January 2021. For Democrats, it is a battle to stave off a conservative tilt so steep that it will affect policies and programs for generations; a Biden Presidency and nomination of a liberal replacement would keep the bench at 5-4, and perhaps turn it around.Ginsburg, who was 87, clearly knew what was at stake as she resolutely kept working despite being diagnosed for pancreatic cancer in 2009 and undergoing angioplasty in 2014. In a statement she reportedly dictated to her granddaughter Clara Spera days before her death, she said, "My most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until a new President is installed."
McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky, had in similar circumstances denied President Barack Obama a confirmation hearing for his nomination of liberal justice Merrick Garland in 2016, arguing that there should not be a replacement in an election year. In keeping with the unprincipled principle that all is fair in love and war, Trump and McConnell are not expected to adhere to the same norm or convention.
Amid howls of protests that included calling McConnell a "ghoulish grim reaper" who could not wait for Ginsburg body to get cold before trying to ram home the Republican advantage, workaday people in Washington streamed towards the US Supreme Court building as news of Ginsburg’s death filtered out shortly after 7.30 pm. There, in hushed whispers, many paid tribute to the petite giant dubbed the Notorious RBG, only the second woman to serve on the US Supreme Court after Sandra Day O’Connor, who made some of he most consequential decisions and dissents in US judicial history.
White House
statement followed, even as Barack Obama and Bill Clinton (who nominated her to SC in 1993) paid moving tributes.An epic fight is now expected to unfold over the next few weeks as Trump -- who has been gloating over packing the courts, including the Supreme Court, with conservative judges – moves ahead with a nomination. McConnell is expected to try and rubber stamp it with the 53-47 Republican majority in
the US Senate
, but not without resistance and complications. At least four GOP Senators are said to have reservations about not abiding by the same principle McConnell laid our for Obama's nomination -- no hearing so close to election.In fact, Democrats are pointing out that early voting has already begun in some states with 46 days to go for Election Day. Besides, Republicans could also lose not just the White House but also their majority in the Senate.
But Trump and McConnell are having none of it. "We were put in this position of power and importance to make decisions for the people who so proudly elected us, the most important of which has long been considered to be the selection of United States Supreme Court Justices. We have this obligation, without delay!" Trump tweeted on Saturday morning, explicitly tagging @GOP. From McConnell came a warning Dear Colleague letter to Senators who may not toe the party line. "This is not the time to prematurely lock yourselves into a position you may later regret..."
If the Democrats and dissenting Republican Senators manage to stave off the confirmation, a prospective Biden Presidency is expected to reshape the court, possibly expanding the bench to 13 to overcome the rigged conservative bias that does not reflect the popular sentiment in the country. "The stakes of this election couldn’t be higher. Millions of Americans are counting on us to win and protect the Supreme Court—for their health, for their families, and for their rights," Kamala Harris tweeted, reflecting this sentiment.
On Saturday morning, Kamala Harris, wearing a casual hoodie, sneakers, and shades, and accompanied by her husband Doug Emhoff, joined a stream of people still trickling up to the footsteps of the Supreme Court to pay tribute to Ginsburg.
Top Comment
Probhat Raha
1536 days ago
I agree with your comments; but I personally disliked Ginsberg.Read allPost comment
Popular from World
- Prince William finds solace in Ella’s company to escape competitive Middleton family games
- Man who Googled 'how to remarry after spouse die' charged for wife's murder in US
- Karine Jean-Pierre reacts to 'why did you and Biden lie' about pardon: 'Because of...'
- Meghan Markle appoints herself CEO of her brand American Riviera Orchard because...
- Canada called 'broken sh**hole' after Trump suggests to Trudeau to make it 51st US state
end of article
Trending Stories
- Who was Brian Thompson? UnitedHealthcare CEO shot outside NYC hotel
- Baba Vanga Predictions 2025: 5 Zodiac Signs are likely to become Rich in 2025
- Baba Vanga Predictions for the year 2025
- New immigration rules may force millions to leave Canada: How these new norms will impact engineers, technicians and others working in the country
- Prince William finds solace in Ella’s company to escape competitive Middleton family games
- Stefon Diggs criticized for Josh Allen remark after Bills' AFC East victory
- Karine Jean-Pierre reacts to 'why did you and Biden lie' about pardon: 'Because of...'
Visual Stories
- How to make healthy Oats Palak Chilla for a kid's tiffin
- 10 best Fried Chicken dishes from around the world
- 10 ways to use turmeric in winters
- 10 animals not allowed as pets in India
- 10 types of Dosa and how they are made
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT