This story is from April 26, 2020
Sikh groups threaten legal action against Scottish government over census
The Sikh Federation UK (SFUK) is threatening the
The federation claims that this contravenes the
On 4 March 2020 the Scottish Parliament approved the draft Census Order for Scotland’s March 2021 Census. Sikhs were not a response option for the ethnicity question, though Indian, Scottish Indian and
The federation, backed by over 150 gurdwaras and Sikh organisations, has via its lawyers, given two weeks notice to Scottish ministers to lay an amended Census Order in the Scottish Parliament with a Sikh ethnic tick box response option included, or face a discrimination lawsuit.
Their pre-action letter states “UK law recognises the Sikh community has a distinct ethnic identity that was confirmed by the House of Lords in Mandla (Sewa Singh) v
The House of Lords held that “ethnic origins meant a group distinguished from others by a sufficient combination of shared customs, beliefs, traditions and characteristics derived from a common or presumed common past” and “that Sikhs were in that sense a racial group, although they were not biologically distinguishable from the other peoples of the Punjab.”
The Scottish government is proposing that the question on ethnic group will include a prompt to write ‘Sikh’ as a response in the 'other ethnic group' section. But the federation says this does not go far enough. Without a Sikh ethnicity tick-box on the next census, the federation claims the Sikh community will continue to be at a disadvantage in relation to the allocation of public resources.
“Sikhs in Scotland are consistently being overlooked and discriminated against by public bodies in deciding policies that impact on them. Without a specific Sikh ethnic tick box response option in the Census 2021, Sikhs in Scotland will fail to be properly monitored by public bodies and would as a result continue to face discrimination in terms of the fair allocation of resources and provision of public services,” said
The federation also on 16 April brought a second judicial review in the High Court against the Cabinet Office over the draft Census (England and Wales) Order 2020 which was laid before Parliament on 2 March 2020. The proposed questions also omit a Sikh response option to the ethnicity question. Instead the only option is “Asian/Asian British” and within that “Indian” can be selected.
The SFUK is simultaneously appealing the High Court ruling from 12 December 2019 which stated that their first judicial review over a Sikh tick box in the England and Wales census was premature because the draft Census Order had not yet been laid. That appeal was lodged on 3 January 2020 in the Court of Appeal.
“Now that the draft Census Order has been laid before Parliament, our lawyers advised us that we have to now put in a second judicial review,” explained
A spokesperson for the Network of Sikh Organisations slammed it as “frivolous litigation.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “National Records of Scotland (NRS) is committed to delivering questions which enable everyone in Scotland to access, understand and complete the census.”
Scottish government
with legal action claiming discrimination for failing to include a tick-box response option for Sikhs in the ethnicity section of its proposed census.European Convention of Human Rights
, EU law and the Equality Act 2010.On 4 March 2020 the Scottish Parliament approved the draft Census Order for Scotland’s March 2021 Census. Sikhs were not a response option for the ethnicity question, though Indian, Scottish Indian and
British Indian
were.The federation, backed by over 150 gurdwaras and Sikh organisations, has via its lawyers, given two weeks notice to Scottish ministers to lay an amended Census Order in the Scottish Parliament with a Sikh ethnic tick box response option included, or face a discrimination lawsuit.
Their pre-action letter states “UK law recognises the Sikh community has a distinct ethnic identity that was confirmed by the House of Lords in Mandla (Sewa Singh) v
Dowell Lee
[1983].” This is referring to a case about a boy Gurinder Singh Mandla who was refused entry to his school in Birmingham because he was wearing a turban in 1978. His parents took the case to the Commission for Racial Equality and the House of Lords, which at that time had a judicial role.The House of Lords held that “ethnic origins meant a group distinguished from others by a sufficient combination of shared customs, beliefs, traditions and characteristics derived from a common or presumed common past” and “that Sikhs were in that sense a racial group, although they were not biologically distinguishable from the other peoples of the Punjab.”
The Scottish government is proposing that the question on ethnic group will include a prompt to write ‘Sikh’ as a response in the 'other ethnic group' section. But the federation says this does not go far enough. Without a Sikh ethnicity tick-box on the next census, the federation claims the Sikh community will continue to be at a disadvantage in relation to the allocation of public resources.
Harnek Singh
, National Press Secretary, SFUK.The federation also on 16 April brought a second judicial review in the High Court against the Cabinet Office over the draft Census (England and Wales) Order 2020 which was laid before Parliament on 2 March 2020. The proposed questions also omit a Sikh response option to the ethnicity question. Instead the only option is “Asian/Asian British” and within that “Indian” can be selected.
The SFUK is simultaneously appealing the High Court ruling from 12 December 2019 which stated that their first judicial review over a Sikh tick box in the England and Wales census was premature because the draft Census Order had not yet been laid. That appeal was lodged on 3 January 2020 in the Court of Appeal.
“Now that the draft Census Order has been laid before Parliament, our lawyers advised us that we have to now put in a second judicial review,” explained
Davinder Singh
, principal adviser to SFUK.A spokesperson for the Network of Sikh Organisations slammed it as “frivolous litigation.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “National Records of Scotland (NRS) is committed to delivering questions which enable everyone in Scotland to access, understand and complete the census.”
Top Comment
G
Gangulyabh
1683 days ago
Ethnicity means to belong to a particular race. Sikhs being of a separate ethnicity is quite confusing and have been rightly termed a frivolous litigation by other Sikh organisations in the UK. Read allPost comment
Popular from World
- 'I just can’t feel sympathy for him': Torrent of hate at health insurers after CEO’s murder in US
- Syrian rebel forces capture Hama: Could Assad’s regime collapse?
- Could Hawk Tuah girl be arrested for her 'crypto scam'? Truth behind the viral claim
- Obtaining bail is a right, monk Chinmoy Krishna Das' plea must be heard, religious heads tell Yunus
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle deeply ‘hurt’ by German documentary 'Harry - The Lost Prince', claims source
end of article
Trending Stories
- Travis Kelce planning a $12 million engagement ring and an "unforgettable" proposal for Taylor Swift
- The Currys Celebrate Growing Family With Baby No. 10 on the Way: Sonya Curry Reflects on Parenthood and Grandparenting in Heartwarming New Episode
- 10 Brain Exercises to Improve Focus and Memory for Board Exams
- Two leading British Indian community figures Rami Ranger and Anil Bhanot stripped of their honours by the King
- Mohammed Siraj's 181.6 kph thunderbolt? Speed-gun blunder triggers meme fest
- 'Pushpa 2' screening: Mumbai Police probe mysterious spray that 'sickened' moviegoers at Bandra's Galaxy theatre
- NEET PG 2025 Tentative Exam Date Announced: Check Other Important Details Here
Visual Stories
- How to make healthy Oats Palak Chilla for a kid's tiffin
- 10 best Fried Chicken dishes from around the world
- 10 ways to use turmeric in winters
- 10 animals not allowed as pets in India
- 10 types of Dosa and how they are made
UP NEXT