The landmark judgment allowing passive euthanasia operates at what the two-judge bench described as the delicate intersection of ‘love, loss, medicine, and mercy’. Here’s how the Supreme Court arrived at the verdict
The Supreme Court’s recent landmark ruling permitting passive euthanasia also brings into focus another significant legal doctrine: the “best interest of the patient.”
The decision, delivered by a two-judge bench comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan, operates at what the judges described as the delicate intersection of “love, loss, medicine, and mercy”.
The decision, delivered by a two-judge bench comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan, operates at what the judges described as the delicate intersection of “love, loss, medicine, and mercy”.