While courts have upheld free speech, the 'Ghooskhor Pandat' case highlights the tension, suggesting box-office success often follows controversy, regardless of bans
Were the makers of ‘Ghooskhor Pandat’ referring to an entire community or a particular individual when they chose this name? If it was an individual, were they referring to an actual person or an imaginary character? If it referred only to a fictional character as the filmmaker argued, weren’t those outraged simply tilting at windmills?