Tom Brady has a statue outside Gillette Stadium, six rings from his New England Patriots run and a franchise back in the Super Bowl without him. Yet as New England prepares for Super Bowl 60 against the Seattle Seahawks, the face of the dynasty refuses to say he is pulling for his old team.
That vacuum has been filled by his old locker room. Rob Gronkowski is joking on TV that Brady “probably wants to be the quarterback,” Vince Wilfork is calling his answer “bull-crap,” and a simple non-pick on a podcast has turned into a public referendum on what “Patriot for life” really means.
Rob Gronkowski says Tom Brady is still wired like a quarterback before Super Bowl 60
Brady laid out his neutral stance on the latest episode of his “Let’s Go!” show with Jim Gray on SiriusXM. Asked who he wanted to win on Sunday, he chose the middle.
“I don’t have a dog in the fight in this one,” Brady said. “May the best team win. And in terms of the Patriots, this is a new chapter in New England, and I’m glad everyone’s embraced the Mike Vrabel regime… We did it for 20 years. There was a little bit of a hiatus in there, but the Patriots are back, and it’s a very exciting time for everyone in New England.” He then went full broadcaster.
“I just wanna see good football,” Brady added. “I wanna see good plays, good throws, good strategy, good decisions.”
On paper, that is a safe, corporate answer from Fox’s new lead analyst who also happens to be a minority owner of the Las Vegas Raiders. On camera, it landed differently. Fans heard distance. Former teammates heard someone ducking a question he would have laughed at a decade ago.
Gronkowski tried to spin it into something else entirely when he joined Kay Adams on “Up & Adams.” Asked why Brady was not picking the Patriots, he framed it as pure, undiluted competitiveness.
“I don’t know. I’m not Tom. I haven’t talked to him yet, since the Patriots were in the Super Bowl. Because he probably wants to be the quarterback. He’s that competitive. He probably wants to be the guy in the Super Bowl right now.”
That line does two things at once. It protects Brady from the “traitor” tag by making this about his wiring, not his loyalty, and it reminds everyone that the quarterback still sees himself as a standard, not a statue.
Gronkowski has no such conflict. He made it clear he is all-in on New England’s new run. “I’m rooting for the Patriots,” Gronkowski said. *“What’s great about the Patriots being in the Super Bowl is … it’s bringing back just how dominant the Patriots are.
“And there’s a lot of fans out there that are mad that the Patriots are back in the Super Bowl, which is great for us,”* he added. “Because that brings back [that] they’re mad because of how many times we won.”
Gronk leans into the villain role, celebrates that people are sick of seeing New England on this stage again and gives Patriots fans exactly what they want to hear. Brady, now a network face and part-owner in another franchise, stays in the middle. That contrast is the real story heading into Sunday.
Vince Wilfork blasts Tom Brady’s neutral answer while New England leans into the Mike Vrabel era
If Gronkowski chose to joke and defend, Vince Wilfork did the opposite. The former defensive tackle went on WEEI and said out loud what plenty of Patriots fans were already thinking when they heard Brady’s podcast answer.
“That’s bull-crap, Tom. Come on now,” Wilfork said. “This ain’t political, what it is. Raiders ain’t in it. Say what it is. What, what do you see? … Man, look, at the end of the day, if you’re a ‘Patriot for life,’ you know what it is.”
He was not done.
“Don’t give me that political bullcrap. That’s just what it is. If you don’t think we’re going to win, just pick Seattle then, right? Don’t straddle the fence.”
Wilfork’s point is simple. In his eyes, “Patriot for life” means you do not hedge when New England is back on the sport’s biggest stage, especially when your own statue sits outside the building. If Brady truly believes in Mike Vrabel and this new roster, say it. If he does not, say that too. What Wilfork cannot stand is the TV-friendly middle.
There are reasons for that middle, and they are not imagined. Brady works for Fox, which is broadcasting Super Bowl 60. He is expected to call the game, not cheerlead one sideline. He also owns a piece of the Raiders, who live in the same AFC ecosystem as the Patriots. Every time he leans publicly toward one team now, someone somewhere reads it as a conflict.
That is the tension playing out in real time. The Patriots are back in the Super Bowl for the first time since Brady and Gronkowski were actually on the field. Kickoff against Seattle is set for 6:30 p.m. ET on Feb. 8, and New England is selling this as the start of a new chapter under Vrabel. The fanbase is emotionally still tied to the old one.
Gronkowski is happy to bridge that gap, laughing on TV and shouting that the Patriots are “back.” Wilfork is willing to be the blunt voice of the locker room, calling out what he sees as fence-sitting. Brady is trying to live in the space between being an all-time Patriot and a league-wide face.
By Sunday night, either the Patriots will have a ring without him or the Seahawks will spoil the party. Whatever happens, Brady’s choice to stay neutral has already done something Fox could never script: it has turned Super Bowl week into a live debate over how far a legend can step away from his old team without losing the people who built that legend with him.
Get the latest ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 updates, including the full schedule, teams, live scores, points table, and key series stats such as top run-scorers and wicket-takers.
Start a Conversation
Post comment