Mumbai man pays ‘Zero Tax’ on ₹5 crore land sale despite filing ITR late; why ITAT still gave tax exemption

In a recent update, a ruling by the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has introduced big-time relief to taxpayers dealing with capital gains tax on property sales. Now this is a case that involves the sale of land costing around ₹5 crore. The tribunal ruled that a Mumbai man did not have to pay any capital gains tax despite filing his Income Tax Return (ITR) after the official deadline. This particular judgment has attracted attention from across the nation because it clarifies how Section 54 of the Income Tax Act works.


Let’s find out in detail:
The incident

A man from Mumbai’s Vile Parle sold three plots of land in 2017 for around INR 5.03 crore. From this, he earned long-term capital gains (LTCG) of approximately INR 3.68 crore. Now as per Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, taxpayers can claim exemption from capital gains tax if they reinvest the gains into a new residential property within a given time period.

But the issue happened after the taxpayer filed his ITR late. Even after the government extended the deadline for filing returns for Assessment Year 2018-19 to October 31, 2018, he filed his return only on December 28, 2018. Also, the man in question did not deposit the capital gains amount into the Capital Gains Account Scheme (CGAS). This is used when taxpayers have not utilised the gains before the filing deadline.

What happened to the capital gains?
The man used the money to buy a new residential property at INR 8.45 crore on December 24, 2018, just days before filing the delayed return. The Income Tax Department denied the exemption claim. The argument given was that the gains were not deposited in the CGAS before the original deadline nor reported through a timely ITR. Therefore, tax benefits should not claimed.


ITAT Mumbai judgement

When the matter reached ITAT Mumbai, the bench ruled in favour of the taxpayer on April 22, 2026. The tribunal observed that Section 54 primarily focuses on whether the capital gains were actually invested in a new residential property within the permitted period.


Since the man had already used the entire capital gains amount for purchasing a new property before filing the belated return under Section 139(4).


Tax experts explained that the judgment distinguishes between “unutilised” and “already utilised” capital gains. If the money has already been invested in a new property before filing the return, even a delayed return, then the purpose of Section 54 is considered fulfilled. The tribunal also referred to earlier court rulings, including decisions by the Karnataka High Court and Guwahati High Court. The judgment is now being viewed as an important precedent for property sellers and homebuyers across India.

Ready to Make a Smarter Property Decision? Build Your Legacy with TOI Homes.