This story is from March 13, 2016
Hindu American Foundation hails Srinivasan, Obama's potential pick for Supreme Court
Suhag Shukla, Executive Director of the Hindu American Foundation, talks about what a first Hindu judge of the U.S Supreme Court could mean:How important (a landmark) is it that the US could have a Supreme Court justice of Hindu faith?
It's yet another moment in Hindu American history. The past few years have brought about many firsts - the first Hindu American congressman, the first Hindu American Surgeon General, the first Hindu American acting Solicitor General - Judge Srinivasan's nomination would signal another indication of not only our community's success, but arrival.
Does one’s religious background influence dispensing of justice? Say on an issue such as abortion or gun laws, will a Hindu judge see it differently than say justices from the Abrahamic faith?
Of course, one's knowledge, experiences, and upbringing influence judgment, as does one's way of understanding life's big questions. That's called being human. In fact, the religious beliefs of various justices historically have been in plain view through the way in which their questions are framed, decisions are worded, or scripture sometimes quoted. That said, our Justices are to base their decisions on the law and jurisprudence, and I have no doubt in Judge Srinivasan's ability to do so.
As to how a Hindu judge may approach issues differently from Abrahamic judges - I'm excited to see. I would venture to say it will be thoughtful, well-reasoned, and contextual. Hinduism, as a pluralistic tradition, has always held inquiry and a quest for truth in the highest esteem. So, every thought, word, or action is an opportunity to take account of duty and the surrounding context in order to arrive at a decision that seeks to serve the highest good.
Purely in terms of jurisprudence, will his orientation be any different from the Christian judges (and a few of Jewish faith) who have dominated the SC bench?
I can only speak from my own context in that if one's Hindu perspective is a part of the equation applied to the most pressing issues of our time, we are generally going to straddle the middle - landing right of center on some, and left of center on others.
Do Hindu scriptures or texts provide any guidelines about justice in the western sense? What is the difference between dharma and justice?
Dharma at its every essence is justice, so there is no difference. But dharma is also much more. It demands that we weigh truth, non-harming, and equanimity, in order to uphold that which is right and just, in every circumstance for every living thing. This is why dharma is difficult - it's not a set of absolute commandments, but a constant striving to selflessly weigh different facts and circumstances - essentially what we entrust our Justices to do.
Does one’s religious background influence dispensing of justice? Say on an issue such as abortion or gun laws, will a Hindu judge see it differently than say justices from the Abrahamic faith?
As to how a Hindu judge may approach issues differently from Abrahamic judges - I'm excited to see. I would venture to say it will be thoughtful, well-reasoned, and contextual. Hinduism, as a pluralistic tradition, has always held inquiry and a quest for truth in the highest esteem. So, every thought, word, or action is an opportunity to take account of duty and the surrounding context in order to arrive at a decision that seeks to serve the highest good.
Purely in terms of jurisprudence, will his orientation be any different from the Christian judges (and a few of Jewish faith) who have dominated the SC bench?
Do Hindu scriptures or texts provide any guidelines about justice in the western sense? What is the difference between dharma and justice?
Dharma at its every essence is justice, so there is no difference. But dharma is also much more. It demands that we weigh truth, non-harming, and equanimity, in order to uphold that which is right and just, in every circumstance for every living thing. This is why dharma is difficult - it's not a set of absolute commandments, but a constant striving to selflessly weigh different facts and circumstances - essentially what we entrust our Justices to do.
Popular from Business
- Mahindra renames EV on IndiGo protest, to move court
- Paytm arm to sell Stock Acquisition Rights in Japan's PayPay for Rs 2,364 crore
- Infosys' Narayana Murthy buys luxury flat in Kingfisher Towers for Rs 50 crore
- UPI empowered marginal borrowers, boosted credit access: Study
- 'Doubt on credibility': IndiGo dismisses low ranking in global survey
end of article
Trending Stories
- India’s first Hyperloop test track is ready! Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw shares exciting update
- RBI Monetary Policy Meeting Highlights: Shaktikanta Das-led MPC keeps repo rate unchanged, cuts CRR to 4%; GDP FY25 outlook revised down to 6.6%
- Stock market today: BSE Sensex opens flat ahead of RBI policy; Nifty50 above 24,700
- Why did RBI governor Shaktikanta Das-led MPC not cut repo rate despite GDP shocker? Top 5 points to know
- UPI Lite new rules 2024: RBI increases UPI Lite wallet, transaction limits - here's what UPI users should know
- Airbus cuts over 2,000 jobs amidst competition from Elon Musk's Starlink
- ‘Investing in India is profitable’: Putin heaps praises on PM Modi; says Russia ready to set up manufacturing operations in India
Visual Stories
- NEET UG 2024 result awaited: Top 10 NIRF-ranked medical colleges of India
- 7 New Expected Bullet Train Routes in India
- 10 Upcoming High-Speed Expressways That Will Change Highway Travel In India
- 8 Transformational Indian Railways Projects You Shouldn’t Miss
- Why Sensex, Nifty50 Hit New Highs, M-Cap At $5 Trillion: Top Reasons
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment