- N Kavitha Rameshwar
- TNNUpdated: Jan 11, 2022, 16:20 IST IST
None of the states have followed the amended Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021 that could ease difficulties for women, save time of court
Four cases, the first of a 25-week pregnancy with a fetal anomaly before the Bombay high court, the next of a 28-week pregnancy with a fetal congenital heart disease before the Delhi high court, the case of a 17-year-old rape survivor in her 22nd week of pregnancy before the Madurai bench of the Madras high court and the case of a 16-year-old rape survivor who was 26 weeks pregnant before the Telangana high court that came up in court in the first week of this year, have one common thread. In all these cases, the high courts have displayed unflinching constitutional commitment while treating as legally sacred the bodily autonomy and reproductive rights and choices of women.
In the same breath, it also exposes the absence of affordable and accessible abortion. Women at such an advanced stage of pregnancy are constrained to approach the courts in spite of the amendment to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021, which enhances the upper gestation limit from 20 to 24 weeks for medical termination of pregnancy in respect of certain categories of women.
In the same breath, it also exposes the absence of affordable and accessible abortion. Women at such an advanced stage of pregnancy are constrained to approach the courts in spite of the amendment to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021, which enhances the upper gestation limit from 20 to 24 weeks for medical termination of pregnancy in respect of certain categories of women.