UAPA case: Supreme Court pulls up Delhi police on bail pleas of Umar Khalid, 3 others; next hearing on Friday
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday deferred till October 31 the hearing on the bail pleas of activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima, and Meeran Haider in the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) case linked to the alleged conspiracy behind the February 2020 Delhi riots.
A bench comprising Justices Aravind Kumar and N V Anjaria adjourned the matter after Additional Solicitor General S V Raju sought time to file a reply.
Raju requested two weeks to submit his response, but the court decided to take up the matter on Friday instead.
"Frankly speaking, in bail matters there is no question of filing counter," the bench said.
Earlier, on September 22, the top court had issued a notice to the Delhi Police, seeking its response on the matter.
The activists had moved the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi high court’s September 2 order that denied them bail.
The high court had rejected the bail pleas of nine people, including Khalid and Imam, observing that "conspiratorial" violence under the garb of demonstrations or protests could not be allowed.
Apart from Khalid and Imam, the others denied bail include Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Mohd Saleem Khan, Shifa Ur Rehman, Athar Khan, Abdul Khalid Saifi, and Shadab Ahmed. The bail plea of another accused, Tasleem Ahmed, was rejected by a different high court bench on the same day.
The high court stated that while the Constitution grants citizens the right to protest and demonstrate peacefully, such actions must remain within the boundaries of the law.
It said that the right to participate in peaceful protests and make speeches in public meetings is protected under Article 19(1)(a) but clarified that this right is "not absolute" and "subject to reasonable restrictions."
"If the exercise of an unfettered right to protest were permitted, it would damage the constitutional framework and impinge upon the law and order situation in the country," the order said.
Khalid, Imam, and others were charged under the UAPA and various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for allegedly being the "masterminds" behind the February 2020 riots, which left 53 people dead and over 700 injured.
The violence erupted during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
The accused, who deny all allegations, have been in jail since 2020 and approached the high court after their bail pleas were rejected by a trial court.
Select The Times of India as your preferred source on Google Search
Raju requested two weeks to submit his response, but the court decided to take up the matter on Friday instead.
"Frankly speaking, in bail matters there is no question of filing counter," the bench said.
Earlier, on September 22, the top court had issued a notice to the Delhi Police, seeking its response on the matter.
The activists had moved the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi high court’s September 2 order that denied them bail.
Apart from Khalid and Imam, the others denied bail include Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Mohd Saleem Khan, Shifa Ur Rehman, Athar Khan, Abdul Khalid Saifi, and Shadab Ahmed. The bail plea of another accused, Tasleem Ahmed, was rejected by a different high court bench on the same day.
The high court stated that while the Constitution grants citizens the right to protest and demonstrate peacefully, such actions must remain within the boundaries of the law.
It said that the right to participate in peaceful protests and make speeches in public meetings is protected under Article 19(1)(a) but clarified that this right is "not absolute" and "subject to reasonable restrictions."
"If the exercise of an unfettered right to protest were permitted, it would damage the constitutional framework and impinge upon the law and order situation in the country," the order said.
Khalid, Imam, and others were charged under the UAPA and various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for allegedly being the "masterminds" behind the February 2020 riots, which left 53 people dead and over 700 injured.
The violence erupted during protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).
The accused, who deny all allegations, have been in jail since 2020 and approached the high court after their bail pleas were rejected by a trial court.
Select The Times of India as your preferred source on Google Search
Top Comment
M
Mahavir Bhartiya
7 minutes ago
No wonder why on social media it's called Supereme kotha and MiaLord.These courts and the judges have made life of a Bhartiya very cheap. Anyone. Can play withe l7ves of hindus and insult their faith. Because they know that nialird of supereme kotha will protect themRead allPost comment
Popular from India
- Pan-India SIR: ECI to announce first phase dates on Monday; 10-15 states to be covered
- Cyclone Montha: Andhra Pradesh, Odisha brace for landfall; schools closed, beach activities suspended
- Indian woman 'pushed into' Bangladesh: Govt moves SC; challenges HC's 'repatriate' order
- Sex assault on Australian cricketers: 'Wanted a selfie', says accused; later admits he stalked players
- India-China air travel resumes after 5 years: IndiGo operates Kolkata-Guangzhou flight; first since 2020
end of article
Trending Stories
- Cyclone Montha: Andhra Pradesh school closure across multiple districts, Odisha also affected; see full list here
- 'Racially aggravated attack': 20-year-old Indian-origin woman raped near London; cops release image of accused
- Aaron Rodgers gushes about ‘special’ relationships but stays silent on wife Brittani and she still remains a secret
- Taylor Swift’s handwritten message to Livvy Dunne goes viral after sending her ‘Life of a Showgirl’ album as surprise gift
- How Connor McDavid’s wife Lauren Kyle McDavid is shaping Edmonton’s design and lifestyle culture
- Row erupts over Melania Trump’s silence on White House demolition: ‘Doesn’t care about history...’
- 'Creepy Asian man' in Canada asks women to 'stay at home' after being called out, sparks outrage
Featured in India
Photostories
- 4 reasons why sages and priests meditate in forests
- 5 common reasons people get into relationships-- Which one is yours?
- Bollywood divas who turned every film into a fashion statement with their iconic style moments
- Dementia myths you should stop believing; they delay early diagnosis
- Sicily’s new Blue Zone secrets are going viral: 5 local habits worth copying
- Rashmika Mandanna to Shriya Saran: South Indian actresses approve these plain silk sarees for the wedding season
- Things older generations thought were polite — but young people totally disagree
- This man ate 24 eggs everyday for 30 days - his blood reports came as a shock!
- 5 fiber-rich sweet potato dishes apt for breakfast
- Halloween 2025: 10 health benefits of saving pumpkin seeds instead of throwing them away
Videos
04:26 Pak-Bangladesh Reset? Gen Mirza Meets Muhammad Yunus After 'Next War Won’t Stay in Kashmir' Warning07:17 Philippines Says India’s Consistent Support For Rule of Law Strengthens ASEAN-India Maritime Ties03:28 'Lesson For Them': BJP Minister Kailash Vijayvargiya Blames Aussie Women Players for 'Molestation'22:12 Sanjay Saraogi, Umesh Sahani Or RK Mishra, Who Holds Edge In Darbhanga? Voters Reveal Mood | Bihar03:24 ‘Life's Best Decision’: BJP's Maithili Thakur On Alinagar Contest Against RJD's Vinod Mishra | Bihar03:08 ‘Indians Are Very Mature…’: US State Secy Marco Rubio’s Big Remark On US-Pakistan Ties06:15 Cyclone Montha: Army, NDRF On Alert As Twin Cyclonic Systems Build Up In Arabian Sea & Bay Of Bengal05:49 ‘Not Just Trade But Cultural Partners’: PM Modi Virtually Addresses ASEAN Summit In Malaysia04:42 'Institutional Murder' Rahul Blames BJP Govt for “Shielding Criminals” in Maha Doctor’s Suicide case
Up Next