This story is from March 31, 2017
Supreme Court refuses early hearing for Ram temple case
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today refused to give an early hearing to the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case , on a plea by BJP MP Subramanian Swamy.
After the court's refusal, Swamy said he was not happy. "So don't be happy," the top court said.
On March 21, the apex court said that fresh attempts must be made by all parties to end the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute through a negotiated settlement . The Chief Justice had offered to mediate between both parties in the Ayodhya case and also said he was willing spare any other sitting SC judge for the purpose
Chief Justice J S Khehar said he was ready to sit down as principal negotiator with the mediators chosen by parties to settle the disputes between Hindus and Muslims over the nearly century-old issue.
The CJI told the BJP's Swamy at the time that that if the parties wanted any other sitting judge of the SC as the principal negotiator, he was ready to make the judge available.
However Swamy contended that several such attempts had been made in the past and that it was time for a judicial intervention to settle the case.
After the Allahabad HC verdict on the issue, appeals from both sides are pending in the Supreme Court for several years.
The Allahabad HC in its 2010 judgement ruled for a 3-way division of the disputed area.The majority of the three-judge bench directed that the disputed site of 2.77 acres be partitioned equally among three parties: Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara (a Hindu group).
Chief Justice J S Khehar said he was ready to sit down as principal negotiator with the mediators chosen by parties to settle the disputes between Hindus and Muslims over the nearly century-old issue.
The CJI told the BJP's Swamy at the time that that if the parties wanted any other sitting judge of the SC as the principal negotiator, he was ready to make the judge available.
After the Allahabad HC verdict on the issue, appeals from both sides are pending in the Supreme Court for several years.
The Allahabad HC in its 2010 judgement ruled for a 3-way division of the disputed area.The majority of the three-judge bench directed that the disputed site of 2.77 acres be partitioned equally among three parties: Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara (a Hindu group).
Top Comment
Mohammed Mohaseen
2787 days ago
We all follow rules,Let the SC decide ,Keep your personal decisions aside.Read allPost comment
Popular from India
- 'Speaks irresponsibly': Nitin Gadkari on Rahul Gandhi's 'memory loss' remark at PM Modi
- GRAP-IV curbs imposed in Delhi from Monday as air quality deteriorates to 'severe plus' category
- Sharad Pawar's wife stopped at business park tied to Ajit's wife
- EC directs Jharkhand BJP to take down controversial social media post over poll code violation
- 1st-year MBBS student dies after ragging at Gujarat college
end of article
Trending Stories
- Taylor Swift may have no desire to return to Higmark Stadium to support Travis Kelce after feeling the full wrath of Bills Mafia in January
- Delhi Chief Minister Atishi orders online classes for all students, except Class 10 and 12, as the national capital enforces GRAP Stage-IV
- GRAP-IV curbs imposed in Delhi from Monday as air quality deteriorates to 'severe plus' category
- Kailash Gahlot resigns: Delhi CM Atishi to handle his departments, proposal sent to LG
- A-list celebrities at Diddy's 'Freak-Off Parties' face legal pressure, read here
- Watch: Allu Arjun and Rashmika Mandanna's 'Pushpa 2: The Rule' trailer out
- Dehradun accident: What happened in the last moments before 6 friends died in horrific car crash
Visual Stories
- 10 easy South Indian snacks for Friday evenings
- 7 genetic traits that babies get from their dad
- 10 good habits of parents that make kids disciplined
- 7 low-maintenance animals to keep as pets
- 10 Korean dishes that are getting popular in India
UP NEXT