SC to hear Friday plea seeking FIR into cash discovery at Justice Varma's residence
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court is slated to hear on Friday a plea seeking a direction to Delhi Police to lodge an FIR over the alleged discovery of semi-burnt stash of cash from the official residence of high court judge Yashwant Varma. According to the SC's cause list for Friday, a bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan is scheduled to hear the matter.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna on Wednesday had refused urgent hearing after lawyer Mathews J Nedumpara mentioned the plea.
The plea was filed by Nedumpara and three others on Sunday seeking a direction to police to lodge an FIR in the matter.
The plea also challenges the 1991 judgement in the K Veeraswami case, in which the top court ruled that no criminal proceedings could be initiated against a judge of the high court or the top court without the prior nod of the Chief Justice of India.
The alleged cash discovery happened following a fire at Varma's Lutyens Delhi residence at around 11.35 pm on March 14, prompting the fire officers to rush to the spot.
On Tuesday, the three members of a Supreme Court-appointed in-house committee visited the residence of Justice Varma, commencing its inquiry in the matter.
In the wake of the controversy, the apex court Collegium recommended the repatriation of Justice Varma to his parent Allahabad High Court. He was already de-rostered by the Delhi High Court following a directive from the CJI.
On March 22, the CJI constituted the three-member committee to conduct an in-house inquiry into allegations and decided to upload on the SC website the inquiry report of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya of the Delhi High Court. It included photos and videos of the alleged discovery of a huge stash of cash.
Justice Varma denounced any insinuation and said no cash was ever placed in the storeroom either by him or any of his family members.
The plea was filed by Nedumpara and three others on Sunday seeking a direction to police to lodge an FIR in the matter.
The plea also challenges the 1991 judgement in the K Veeraswami case, in which the top court ruled that no criminal proceedings could be initiated against a judge of the high court or the top court without the prior nod of the Chief Justice of India.
The alleged cash discovery happened following a fire at Varma's Lutyens Delhi residence at around 11.35 pm on March 14, prompting the fire officers to rush to the spot.
On Tuesday, the three members of a Supreme Court-appointed in-house committee visited the residence of Justice Varma, commencing its inquiry in the matter.
In the wake of the controversy, the apex court Collegium recommended the repatriation of Justice Varma to his parent Allahabad High Court. He was already de-rostered by the Delhi High Court following a directive from the CJI.
Justice Varma denounced any insinuation and said no cash was ever placed in the storeroom either by him or any of his family members.
Top Comment
Ramesh Mishra
9 days ago
FALSE FIR FILED AGAINST A UP NRI, A TRUE STORY 1) My lawyer on 19 October 2024, in the District Court of Prayagraj, in my civil case 2890/2017, found a false FIR, unsigned back dating to 12 April 2024, the complainant was A Amrit Lal the orderly of the SDM Prajapati Tehsil Handia, unknown to me, 2) I instructed my lawyer to visit the SHO, and get signed copy of FIR, email to me, my lawyer emailed the signed copy of FIR on 20 October, 2024, 3) SDM Prajapati, SHO Braj Kishor Gautam of Handia were bribed by the Land Mafia, Lawyers, My younger brother, illiterate,impotent and mentally of unsound mind, members of my extended family to tarnish my reputation, extort money and steal my property in the Prayagraj, these people contracted my murder three times and I survived,4) Varma J. his wife and family members denying storing cash in their home, therefore filing FIR against him is not sustainable, 5) To entangle Verma J. in a FIR, the police need " Prima Facie" irrefutable and unshakable evidence to persuade the courts and the public. If Varma J. is framed similarly I am framed, its preposterous to proceed further. Varma J. was a lawyer, became a judge and of a sound mind, Indian judiciary has problem and for the details read, In the High Court of Allahabad, U/A 227, file 2343 of 2023. This file has mind boggling evidence demonstrating " Indian Judiciary is dommed".Read allPost comment
Popular from India
- Stalin insulted PM Modi, owes apology to Tamil Nadu: BJP's Annamalai slams CM for skipping Rameswaram event
- 'Economic metric will always be higher than in previous years': P Chidambaram responds to PM Modi on Tamil Nadu funds
- Delhi’s mercury soars above normal, UP braces for prolonged heat, and Rajasthan's Barmer sets April record
- 'At least put your signature in Tamil': PM Modi takes shot at DMK govt over language row
- Visuals show first train crossing new Pamban Bridge as PM Modi flags off sea link, train & ship
end of article
Trending Stories
- Travis Kelce donates $3.3 million home to Kansas City charity, sparking speculation about Taylor Swift’s possible involvement
- Anyone who isn't a US citizen should think twice before traveling outside especially if...: Experts warn amid crackdown
- Elon Musk believes the 'biggest threat’ to US citizens is…
- When LinkedIn co-founder told employees: Go home, have dinner with family, and then open laptops to …
- Jim Cramer predicts 1987 'Black Monday' style stock market crash because of Trump tariffs in viral video
- “You made the hockey world proud”: Janet Jones recalls Wayne Gretzky's locker room speech before USA-Canada 4 Nations finals
- How Walmart Boycott is different from Boycott calls against Target and Amazon
Visual Stories
- How to make South Indian Paneer Butter Masala Dosa for breakfast
- 10 ancient animals that still exist
- 10 exotic animals to spot inside Kashmir's Dachigam National Park
- 10 powerful ways to detox and reset your mind
- 10 things parents should never do in the morning before sending kids to school
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT