This story is from July 25, 2020
Reconstitute Dubey probe panel, SC urged
NEW DELHI: Advocates-cum-PIL petitioners on Friday moved the Supreme Court seeking reconstitution of the Justice B S Chauhan commission set up to inquire into the encounter killings of gangster
The petitioners, Anoop Prakash Awasthi and Ghanshyam Upadhyay, said commission member and ex-DGP K L Gupta had given statements to the media immediately after the July 10 encounter killing of Dubey that the police should not be doubted all the time. He had purportedly said, “On face value, we should accept what the police are saying. Why do we always start with negativity and dub the police wrong? Encounters are not done, they happen.”
Upadhyay claimed that Justice S K Agarwal, who was first appointed by the UP government as a one-member judicial commission to inquire into the July 2 killing of eight policemen and subsequent encounter killings of Dubey and his associates, was unfit to be in a commission of inquiry as he had resigned as a judge from
Awasthi and Upadhyay sought replacement of Justice Agarwal and Gupta by suitable persons to enable the public to have faith in the Justice Chauhan commission’s inquiry into the incidents.
Vikas Dubey
and his aides and sought substitution of two of its members saying their continuation would create doubts about the fairness of the inquiry.The petitioners, Anoop Prakash Awasthi and Ghanshyam Upadhyay, said commission member and ex-DGP K L Gupta had given statements to the media immediately after the July 10 encounter killing of Dubey that the police should not be doubted all the time. He had purportedly said, “On face value, we should accept what the police are saying. Why do we always start with negativity and dub the police wrong? Encounters are not done, they happen.”
Upadhyay claimed that Justice S K Agarwal, who was first appointed by the UP government as a one-member judicial commission to inquire into the July 2 killing of eight policemen and subsequent encounter killings of Dubey and his associates, was unfit to be in a commission of inquiry as he had resigned as a judge from
Allahabad high court
protesting his transfer toJharkhand
high court.Awasthi and Upadhyay sought replacement of Justice Agarwal and Gupta by suitable persons to enable the public to have faith in the Justice Chauhan commission’s inquiry into the incidents.
Popular from India
- Padma Awards 2025: Government announces first list of Padma Shri awardees; see full list
- Saif Ali Khan stabbing: Mumbai Police suspect more involved, probe widens
- ONOE can prevent policy paralysis, says President Murmu in her address to nation on Republic Day-eve: Key quotes
- Uttarakhand set to become first state to implement Uniform Civil Code (UCC) on January 27
- President Droupadi Murmu approves Gallantry awards for 93 armed forces personnel on eve of Republic Day; see full list
end of article
Trending Stories
- Just days after being dumped by Mark Zuckerberg, former Meta COO Sheryl Sandberg gets court notice for 'using Gmail' and deleting emails
- Derrick Henry’s NFL future takes a dramatic turn as girlfriend Adrianna Rivas and Ravens GM hint at what’s next
- Elon Musk's ex-girlfriend Grimes: I would like to state that the father of my children was ...
- US freezes foreign aid for almost all countries including Ukraine, except Israel and Turkey
- Canada to launch 4 new permanent residency pathways in 2025: Are you eligible?
- A divided Senate, a decisive moment: Donald Trump, Republicans celebrate Pete Hegseth's confirmation as defense secretary
- Jennifer Aniston admitted it: Megyn Kelly on separation rumours about Obamas
Visual Stories
- 10 most beautiful sea animals
- 10 simple and practical ways to achieve internal happiness
- 10 ways to add fiber-rich cabbage in daily diet
- 10 South Indian dishes that are easy to make for breakfast
- From Lion to Butterfly: 10 animals and what do they symbolise
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment