This story is from September 02, 2022
Gujarat riots: SC grants interim bail to activist Teesta Setalvad, asks her to surrender passport
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday granted interim bail to activist Teesta Setalvad, arrested in June for allegedly fabricating evidence to frame "innocent people" in the 2002 Gujarat riots cases.
She has been asked to surrender her passport with the trial court, till the Gujarat high court decides on her regular bail plea. She has also been asked to cooperate with the investigating agency.
"The appellant has been in custody for more than two months and at this stage is certainly entitled the relief of interim bail during the pendency of consideration of her substantive application which is penidng before HC," the apex court observed while granting relief to Setalvad.
The court also said it has considered the matter only from the standpoint of interim bail and the Gujarat high court shall decide Teesta Setalvad's bail plea independently and uninfluenced by any observations made by the Supreme Court.
The matter had come up for hearing on Thursday as well, when CJI UU lalit orally observed that offences against Setalvad are normal IPC offences, having no bar on grant of bail.
"These are not offences like murder or bodily injury but based on documents like forgery etc. In these matters the normal idea is after normal police custody is over, there is nothing for the police to insist on custody," CJI Lalit had said.
The court had also expressed surprise at the delay in listing of Setalvad's bail plea by the Gujarat high court, that on August 3 issued a notice to the state government on the plea and fixed the matter for hearing on September 19.
"Give us instances where a lady accused in such cases has got such dates from high court. Either this lady has been made an exception. How can the court give this date? Is this standard practice in Gujarat?” an apparently displeased CJI had said.
Teesta Setalvad was arrested for allegedly fabricating evidence to frame "innocent people" in the 2002 Gujarat riots cases.
In response to her bail plea, the Gujarat government said that the activist had "enacted" the conspiracy along with other accused at the behest of a senior political leader.
A sessions court at Ahmedabad, on July 30, rejected the bail application of Setalvad.
On August 22, the Supreme Court had sought a response from the Gujarat government on the bail plea.
"The appellant has been in custody for more than two months and at this stage is certainly entitled the relief of interim bail during the pendency of consideration of her substantive application which is penidng before HC," the apex court observed while granting relief to Setalvad.
The court also said it has considered the matter only from the standpoint of interim bail and the Gujarat high court shall decide Teesta Setalvad's bail plea independently and uninfluenced by any observations made by the Supreme Court.
The matter had come up for hearing on Thursday as well, when CJI UU lalit orally observed that offences against Setalvad are normal IPC offences, having no bar on grant of bail.
"These are not offences like murder or bodily injury but based on documents like forgery etc. In these matters the normal idea is after normal police custody is over, there is nothing for the police to insist on custody," CJI Lalit had said.
The court had also expressed surprise at the delay in listing of Setalvad's bail plea by the Gujarat high court, that on August 3 issued a notice to the state government on the plea and fixed the matter for hearing on September 19.
Teesta Setalvad was arrested for allegedly fabricating evidence to frame "innocent people" in the 2002 Gujarat riots cases.
In response to her bail plea, the Gujarat government said that the activist had "enacted" the conspiracy along with other accused at the behest of a senior political leader.
A sessions court at Ahmedabad, on July 30, rejected the bail application of Setalvad.
On August 22, the Supreme Court had sought a response from the Gujarat government on the bail plea.
Top Comment
Ved Parkash Saini
861 days ago
Not only SC but High Court Judges's Mentality is also to favor anti-national, Anti-hindu, This has been proven by the verbal speech of S C judge In the case of Nupur Sharma It appears we are not living in our country, Which have been divided on the basis of religion, Now the question arises-Which country is for Hindus,India is for those political parties Which appease Muslims to get power, and never watch the welfare of HindusRead allPost comment
Popular from India
- Indonesia president may not club Republic-Day India visit with Pakistan trip
- Juna Akhara expels mahant for accepting girl, 13, as ‘donation’
- Amid Manipur strife, a school for harmony that bridges Kuki-Meitei divide
- 'Constant frisking': Manipur mob sets Assam Rifles camp on fire
- 'Shameful, unfortunate': Principal orders 80 schoolgirls to remove shirts for writing on them, probe ordered
end of article
Trending Stories
- How the LA wildfire turned deadly, claiming at least 11 lives and gutting thousands of homes
- Elon Musk is worried about Jeff Bezos ex-wife MacKenzie Scott’s Rs 1,36,000 crore donation; here’s why
- Did Kamala Harris 'crop out' Donald Trump from Jimmy Carter's funeral photo? Social media calls her 'legendary'
- Jonathan Owens and Simone Biles Combined Net Worth: How the Couple Built Their Empire
- Patrick Mahomes And Brittany Mahomes Combined Net Worth: How the Couple Built Their Empire
- Suchir Balaji's case under 'active investigation'? Mother says he was not okay with OpenAI becoming for-profit
- Taylor Swift hits new milestones, achieving what no woman has yet, as Travis Kelce eyes another Super Bowl win
Visual Stories
- 14 popular vegetarian dishes around the world
- 11 biggest fruits in the world
- How to grow Pomegranate in the terrace or balcony garden
- 10 popular vegetarian dishes for a nutritious breakfast
- Krithi Shetty embodies timeless grace
UP NEXT