Supreme Court cancels Darshan’s bail: Ramya welcomes verdict, justice above celebrity status

Former Congress MP Ramya lauded the Supreme Court's decision to cancel actor Darshan Thoogudeepa's bail in a murder case, emphasizing equality before the law. The Supreme Court bench criticized the Karnataka High Court for overlooking key evidence and cited Darshan's alleged attempts to influence the investigation and tamper with evidence.
Supreme Court cancels Darshan’s bail in Renukaswamy murder case | Orders 'immediate arrest'
Speaker Ramya, a former Congress MP and actress, has welcomed the Supreme Court's announcement that actor Darshan Thoogudeepa's bail has been cancelled. "This is a very important verdict that says everyone is equal before the law. It shows the society that the law will take its course and deliver justice," she said in an interview with ANI.

SC bench highlights Karnataka HC ignored key evidence in granting bail

As per ANI, the bench headed by Supreme Court Justices R. Mahadevan and J.P. Partiwala, which heard the case, said that the Karnataka High Court verdict granting bail to Darshan ignored strong evidence, it pointed out that the conviction was based on reasons that contradicted the legal principles established in murder cases. The court also held that reasons such as the mere filing of a chargesheet, the presence of a large number of witnesses, or the risk of the case being prolonged cannot be fundamental reasons for reducing the seriousness of the crime.

Court cites Darshan’s alleged attempts to influence probe and tamper evidence

Furthermore, the court pointed to records showing that Darshan made systematic attempts to influence the investigation. Details such as arranging for them to surrender as co-accused, providing money to cover up the crime, and using the police to interfere in the FIR and postmortem process were placed before the Supreme Court.
The court pointed out that CCTV footage from the convict's house was destroyed and that he influenced witnesses by participating in open public meetings after bail.

Judges stress that fame or political influence cannot dilute justice delivery

In the end, the Supreme Court emphasized that bail cannot be granted based solely on the status of celebrities, and that fame, political dominance, and influence in society should not adversely affect the administration of justice. "Celebrities don't have less responsibility, they have more. They are role models in society. Granting bail in the face of allegations of conspiracy to murder would send a false message to society and undermine public confidence in the judiciary," the ruling stated.
"Get the latest updates on Times of India, including reviews of the movie Coolie and War 2."
author
About the Author
TOI Entertainment Desk

The TOI Entertainment Desk is a dynamic and dedicated team of journalists, working tirelessly to bring the pulse of the entertainment world straight to the readers of The Times of India. No red carpet goes unrolled, no stage goes dark - our team spans the globe, bringing you the latest scoops and insider insights from Bollywood to Hollywood, and every entertainment hotspot in between. We don't just report; we tell tales of stardom and stories untold. Whether it's the rise of a new sensation or the seasoned journey of an industry veteran, the TOI Entertainment Desk is your front-row seat to the fascinating narratives that shape the entertainment landscape. Beyond the breaking news, we present a celebration of culture. We explore the intersections of entertainment with society, politics, and everyday life.

End of Article
Follow Us On Social Media
Tired of too many ads?go ad free now