Bombay High Court to hear Vashu Bhagnani's side in the 'Batti Gul Meter Chalu' and 'Fanney Khan' case
Both the films 'Batti Gul Meter Chalu' and 'Fanney Khan' are much-awaited films of this year. But over a few months, the films have faced several issues due to which the shooting of the movies have also been delayed. On Tuesday, the Delhi High Court had restrained Vashu Bhagnani’s Pooja Film Company and Pooja Entertainment & Films Ltd from interfering with the distribution and release of 'Batti Gul Meter Chalu' and 'Fanney Khan'.
According to reports, T-Series had earlier filed a case against Bhagnani claiming that he was interfering with the distribution and release of both the movies. According to them, he had issued baseless public notices asking the film distributors and theater owners to not sign any agreements to release the two movies.
In the court, the lawyers of T-Series said that they had sent many replies to Bhagnani’s legal team asking them to provide with the agreements under which they have the rights of both the films. The lawyers even claimed that instead of replying to the requests the Bhagnani’s team kept on sending notices to the distributors to not hold any deal with T-Series. The lawyers claimed that this unlawful interference has resulted in a big loss to the company.
Considering the fact that there are many third party investors in these films, the court directed to take up the matter next week and even restrained Vashu Bhagnani's production house to interfere in any matter of both the movies.
But when a tabloid contacted Vashu Bhagnani for the same he said that he did not receive any notices about the same. He further said that he had filed a case against the production houses and the case will be heard by Justice Kathawalla in the Bombay High Court on Friday.
He further said that he had filed the rights of two films with KriArj Entertainment last December. He added that he had no clue about the involvement of T-Series and Anil Kapoor Film and Communication, in both the film.
No intervening in ‘Fanney Khan’ and ‘Batti Gul Meter Chalu', says Delhi HC to Vashu Bhagnani
Both ‘Fanney Khan’ and ‘Batti Gul Meter Chalu’ have been facing turmoil and incessant indifferences and legal troubles with the producers. The movies came under the scanner due to the legal spat between the co-producers. However, now as per latest reports, the Delhi High Court has restrained noted film producer Vashu Bhagnani owned Pooja Film Company and Pooja Entertainment & Films Ltd. from interfering with the distribution and release of the films ‘Fanney Khan’ and ‘Batti Gul Meter Chalu’, both of which are scheduled for release next month and are being co-produced by T-series.
‘Fanney Khan’ starring Anil Kaporo, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and Rajkummar Rao and ‘Batti Gul Meter Chalu’ starring Shahid Kapoor, Shraddha Kapoor and Yami Gautam, both have created immense buzz since their inception. However, these controversies fetched them only negative publicity amongst the fans.
The Delhi High Court was hearing a suit filed by T-Series, claiming that Vashu Bhagnani was interfering in the release and distribution of these films by issuing baseless public notices asking various theatre owners and film distributors in the country to not enter into any agreements to release these films. It was also reported that Vashu Bhagnani had apparently also served legal notices to Bhushan Kumar’s T-series, Prernaa Arora’s KriArj Entertainment and Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra’s production house last month claiming to have acquired rights in these films from KriArj last year itself.
The lawyers representing T-series also reportedly stated in court that they had sent multiple replies to Vashu’s legal team last month, asking them to provide a copy of these alleged agreements, where he claimed to have got the rights. However, instead of responding to the requests, Vashu’s team chose to issue public notices and ask the film distributors across the country to not execute any deals with T-series or film’s producers. The lawyers argued that this led to an unlawful interference with the film by Vashu Bhaganani and was creating tremendous uncertainty and suspicion over T-series’ rights in these films, which was uncalled for and leading to severe losses.
When contacted, Advocate Neel Mason of Mason & Associates, who appeared for T-Series said that “Our case is quite simple. T-series co-produced ‘Batti Gul Meter Chalu’ with KriArj and ‘Fanney Khan’ with KriArj and Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra Productions, under written agreements, all of which were executed much prior in time than Vashu Bhagnani’s alleged agreements. These agreements prohibited KriArj from entering into any agreements with any third party without the written consent of T-series. Therefore, any agreement that KriArj may have entered into with Vashu ji’s companies, are void in law and cannot supersede our client’s rights. As regards why, when and where did KriArj execute these so-called agreements with Vashu ji or what happened with the money paid to KriArj is for KriArj to explain. Our Client cannot be made to suffer if KriArj has exceeded its rights and taken money from someone, without our client’s written consent.”
Considering that such matters suddenly saw daylight in the court which involved claims made by multiple third party investors in these films, the Delhi High Court directed the matters to be taken up together next week. In the meanwhile the Honourable court restrained Pooja Films and Pooja Entertainment & Films Ltd. from issuing any notice or making any claims in relation to these films.
Salman Khan’s farmhouse comes under environmental scanner
Salman Khan’s lavish farmhouse in Panvel was faced with an environmental audit recently. Reportedly, the Maharashtra forest department had served a show-cause notice to the star’s family over alleged constructions on his farmhouse at Panvel. Reports add that the Khan family owned Arpita Farms is in Wajapur which was declared as an eco-sensitive zone in 2003 which restricts constructions. But 9 constructions on the property were found out to be raised after that.
Reportedly, an offence was registered for violating the Forest Act for cement/concrete construction on Arpita Farms. Apparently, within 11 days after the notice issued to Salman Khan’s family, the forest officer who issued the notice, SS Kapse was shifted out of his jurisdiction at Wajapur. Kapse is reportedly challenging the transfer and has sent a representation to the forest department to revoke the transfer orders.
According to reports, some forest department officials confirmed that the constructions were regularized through an order by the Maharashtra government on April 3, 2017. Salman’s father Salim Khan reacted to this development by saying that it’s only an allegation and the family will speak at the right time as they have nothing more to say right now.
Is John Abraham upset over not receiving any support during his spat with Prernaa Arora?
John Abraham’s legal spat with the co-producer of his upcoming movie ‘Parmanu: The Story of Pokhran’, Prernaa Arora had been going on since a long time. After a long struggle and unending court hearings, the issue has been finally resolved, after John Abraham took the matter in his own hands. As per reports, last week, the Bombay High Court ruled in favour of Abraham's banner, ceasing Arora's association with the film.
The legal troubles around the film made its release get stalled incessantly. However, the verdict has now enabled the movie to finally hit the theatres on May 25th. While such issues usually get highlighted among the industry members, surprisingly no one from the Hindi film scenario came in support of John Abraham or even spoke about it.
While interacting with a daily, John revealed how despite several filmmakers running into trouble with Prernaa, he failed to find any support from his friends from the Bollywood industry. He further added that neither anyone came out in support of him, nor did he expect anyone to voice out their opinion on this issue. He emphasised on the fact how people were thanking their cards that they aren’t facing such an issue themselves. He professed that he has cleaned up the mess for a lot of people and concluded by saying that it was all because he had the guts to stand up for what is right, credible and honest.
Here's why Hansal Mehta is not entitled to the revenue of Rajkummar Rao's 'Omerta' anymore
Apparently, the ‘Simran’ director is now in a legal trouble. As per reports, Amit Agarwal, of the Kolkata-based Adarsh Telemedia Pvt Ltd, from whom Hansal Mehta borrowed Rs 8.30 crore for the film, has sued them in Kolkata High Court for non-payment of dues, along with interest accrued on the principal amount.
On Friday, the Arbitrator released the judgement that suggested Hansal deposit the proceeds he earns from ‘Omerta’ in a separate account of a nationalised bank and to later disclose the details to the Arbitral Tribunal through an affidavit.
Moreover, Amit filed a case against the producers. He reportedly said that the Kolkata High Court had passed an order asking Hansal and Shailesh to deposit Rs 1.5 crore, which they didn’t. And that’s exactly why he filed the case of contempt against them. And since there was a clause of arbitration, he could get the Arbitrator appointed by the Supreme Court.
As per reports, Amit Agarwal was benefitted with only an amount of Rs 1.25 crores from the two producers, and post constant follow-ups, he chose to drag them to the court. He reportedly revealed that Shailesh was also said to be the producer of ‘Omerta’, but he believes that he purposely got his name removed to get away without paying Amit’s proceeds.
No comments from either Hansal or Shailesh have been reported.
Shah Rukh Khan's Alibaug property case verdict delayed
Reportedly, the ‘Raees’ actor can’t take a sigh of relief till December 2018 from the Income Tax department which is currently investigating the case.
The ‘Zero’ actor has been accused of buying the Alibaug property under the false pretense of using it for agricultural purposes and has instead built a farmhouse on the land. Reportedly, the land is owned in the name of Deja vu Farms Pvt Ltd., which was acquired under Section 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (which stipulates that only a farmer can buy agricultural land).
Apparently, as per reports it has been utilized for the luxurious purpose. Therefore, the property dispute has reached a point of hearing to New Delhi.
Zareen Khan to land in a legal suit with producer of ‘Aksar 2’ for calling the film ‘vulgar’
Sanjay Dutt lands in legal soup over 'Jaadu Ki Jhappi' remark for Mayawati
Makers of Shah Rukh Khan’s ‘Fan’ ordered to compensate woman for mental harassment
Her initial plea was dismissed on the grounds that there was no relation between the complainant and respondent as consumer and service provider. Though, in a recent development earlier this month, the Aurangabad circuit bench of the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission felt that her complaint was acceptable. The makers, Yash Raj Films, have been instructed to pay Rs 15,000 to Zaidi – Rs 10,000 for mental harassment and Rs 5,000 as the cost of the complaint.
Madhur Bhandarkar to get police protection after Congress workers demand a ban on ‘Indu Sarkar’
The makers of ‘Indu Sarkar’ were forced to cancel their promotional events in Nagpur and Pune, after alleged protests by Congress workers. In another incident, protests were held outside the CBFC office by Congress. It was reported that Mumbai Youth Congress will be demanding a ban on ‘Indu Sarkar’.
Bhandarkar has been facing protests by members of Congress against the film, which is said to have characters inspired by Indira Gandhi and her younger son Sanjay Gandhi.
Kumar Vishwas offers to pay Rs 32 after being accused of copyright infringement by Amitabh Bachchan
According to reports, Vishwas then received a legal notice from Bachchan, asking him to take down the video from Youtube within 24 hours and threatening legal action for failure to comply. He also demanded an account of the revenue generated through "exploitation of the poem". On Wednesday, Vishwas tweeted that he had received appreciation from the families of all the poets he had paid tribute to in his videos, and it was only Bachchan who had reacted by serving him a legal notice. Vishwas then said the video has been deleted from Youtube and he would be sending his earnings from the video - a meagre Rs 32, as he tweeted, “Rcvd appreciation frm all poet's family but Notice frm you Sir. Deleting the Tribute video to Babuji. Sending earned Rs 32 as demanded. Pranam”
Court puts 'Neerja' producers on notice for "criminal conspiracy" accusation by Bhanot family
It had been reported that the late Pan-Am flight attendant's brothers Aneesh and Akhil, had signed an agreement with the producers for 10% of the film's profit. While the film went on to make an estimated Rs 125 crore at the box-office, the family revealed that they were given a sum of just Rs 7.5 lakh.
The family had reportedly planned to give the amount to a trust in Neerja’s name and help others. A report said that they were given an undisclosed amount, which they refused.
The high court has sought response by August 11.
'Neerja' co-producers Fox Star Studios had recently distanced itself from the controversial disagreement between main producers Blingg Unplugged and the Bhanot family over sharing of profits, saying they do not have any "contractual obligations towards the family".
Neerja was killed while trying to save the lives of passengers onboard Pan-Am flight 73 in Karachi. The film starring Sonam Kapoor in the titular role, released on 19 February 2016. Helmed by Ram Madhvani, the movie was well appreciated by the critics and gathered a lot of accolades.
'Toilet: Ek Prem Katha' producers deny copyright allegations
The producers of the Akshay-Bhumi starrer have now come forward to rubbish the claims. Prernaa Arora co-producer of the film, termed the allegations as "baseless and untrue", stating that the script of the film belonged to the writers since 2013.
Producer and co-founder of Friday Film Works, Shital Bhatia has also reportedly denied all misleading claims and was quoted saying that the film was based largely on open defecation in the country. They also said that it was "ridiculous, frustrating and insulting" to say that they have "copied someone’s work".
According to latest reports, the makers are even threatening to file a defamation case against Vyas.
Helmed by Shree Narayan Singh, 'Toilet: Ek Prem Katha' is slated to release on 11 August 2017.
Court declares Mamta Kulkarni and husband Vicky Goswami as proclaimed offenders
According to a report in Mumbai Mirror, special public prosecutor Shishir Hire said that after the police file a compliance report in the court after a month, they will be in a position to seize their immovable property in India after a court order.
The duo has been declared as absconders in the drug haul case which came into public view last year when the Thane police seized over 20 tonnes of Ephedrine and 2.5 tonnes of acetic anhydride - both banned party drugs from a pharmaceutical factory in Solapur - and other spots in Thane and Mumbai.
Investigations have revealed Goswami's involvement with Kenya-based international drug mafia in the racket.
Mamata's lawyers have denied all allegations against her.
Hrithik on legal tussle with Kangana: There’s a lot I want to say
Scroll down to know of more celebs who ran into legal trouble.
Amitabh, Aishwarya, Jackie Chan named in Panama leak papers
Hrithik Roshan slapped with another legal notice, this time it involves the Pope!
While the Greek god is stuck in an unending legal tussle with the 'Queen' actress, check out which other celebs were caught in legal trouble recently...
Preity Zinta acquitted in check bouncing case
This isn't the first time a B-Towner has been embroiled in a legal trouble; there have been several instances in the past too. move on to read about other celebs who have been involved in legal battles...
FIR filed against Sunny Leone and Vir Das
'Mastizaade' is not the only sex comedy movie to come under fire this year. Click on the next slide to find out which other sex comedy landed up in a legal soup...
Mandana Karimi lands in a legal soup
Click on the next slide to know why Sudhanshu Pandey had send a legal notice to Rakesh Roshan and Sanjay Gupta...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Mumbai Mirror had earlier reported that Rakesh Roshan and Sanjay Gupta were teaming up for a love story-cum-revenge drama featuring Hrithik Roshan. But the film, which was to roll in Mumbai in February and be shot over a four-month marathon schedule, has found itself in a legal soup. According to MumbaiMirror.com, the model-actor, Sudhanshu Pandey, is suing the makers for copyright infringement of his story, screenplay, and dialogue. He said that he had spent two-and-a-half years nurturing his script titled, Farmayish. He alleged that the story was his and was to be the debut production, made under his banner Raw Stock Production Private Limited.
Click to the next slide to know more about Kolkata Knight Riders co-owner, Shah Rukh Khan legal trouble...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
According to a Times Now report, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has issued summons to Kolkata Knight Riders co-owner, Shah Rukh Khan, for allegedly breaching the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) norms. It further goes on to say that Kolkata Knight Riders Sports Pvt Ltd, which is co-owned by Shah Rukh Khan, Juhi Chawla and Jay Mehta, is suspected to have undervalued its shares in a transfer deal with a Mauritius company. It also mentions that Shah Rukh Khan has asked for more time to appear before the ED, as he is out of town.
Read on to know why an FIR was filed against Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Ranveer Singh...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
After it was reported that a Pune-based lawyer had filed an FIR against Sanjay Leela Bhansali and Ranveer Singh, the filmmaker's spokesperson has cleared the air. The spokesperson has issued a statement that reads, “The team of Bajirao Mastani was shooting today (Friday) at the Bhor Rajwada court in Pune. When crucial shots had to be taken, the few people present in the court were asked to leave so as to avoid chaos and crowding. The crew has been extremely professional and ensured that the shoot took off smoothly and in the most respectful manner. No one was mistreated during the shoot."
Click on the next slide to find out as to which actor was accused of raping a TV actress...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Munnabhai M.B.B.S. actor, Vishal Thakkar, who had a cameo appearance in the film, has been booked for raping a television actress in Mumbai, as reported by a leading daily. The actor was earlier allegedly in a live-in relationship with the actress but the two had parted ways due to his abusive conduct. An FIR has been filed at a Mumbai police station by the actress who alleged that Vishal had called her for her birthday party and promised to start afresh but later physically assaulted her. The actress, however, managed to approach the nearby police station to report the matter.
On the other hand, an ad-film director was held for molesting minor artist. Know more...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
According to a PTI report, A 47-year-old ad-film director has been arrested for allegedly molesting a minor artiste during a shoot at South Delhi’s Fatehpur Beri, the police said. Accused Ravinder Ahlawat also owns an acting school in Lajpat Nagar.The incident was reported last month, after which Ravinder went missing. He was arrested after he returned to Delhi. In her complaint, the girl stated that Ravinder molested her on the pretext of giving her acting lessons and also offered her roles in documentaries and ad films. Last month, they went to Fatehpur Beri for a shoot, where he allegedly touched her inappropriately, she stated in her complaint. When she resisted, he threatened to dismiss her from his group. She had joined the group as a child actor a few years ago, he said.
Read on to know why actor Khalid Siddiqui got into a legal trouble...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
According to a Mumbai Mirror report, actor Khalid Siddiqui, 41, was arrested earlier this week by the Khar police after he had an altercation with his estranged wife Raahat. The incident occurred around 3 am on Wednesday outside the apartment of his 'girlfriend' in Bandra, where Siddiqui allegedly molested Raahat in front of the building's watchmen. Siddiqui was later granted bail by the Bandra court after he claimed there was no intention to outrage his wife's modesty, and that despite their separation technically she was still his wife. According to the complaint filed by Raahat, who works as an interior designer, Siddiqui had not been taking care of their children and "abused and molested" her when she objected.
Read on to know more about the rape case against Peepli Live director...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
According to an IANS report, an American woman, who was allegedly raped by Bollywood movie Peepli Live director Mahmood Farooqui, has testified as a prosecution witness in the case, sources said. The 35-year-old woman reiterated the same point which she had made earlier while filing the first information report, court sources said. Meanwhile, Farooqui's defence counsel started cross-examination of the woman after the prosecution concluded recording of testimonies during in-camera proceedings. Additional Sessions Judge Sanjiv Jain listed the matter for Monday for further recording of the woman's statement. The court framed rape charges on September 2 against Farooqui, who is in judicial custody since June 20. In July, Delhi Police chargesheeted Farooqui for allegedly raping the woman.
Read on to know about Saif Ali Khan's trouble...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
It seems nothing is going right for Saif Ali Khan. After the Phantom controversy, here comes another trouble for the actor. According to a media report, Saif and Amrita Arora's husband, Shakeel Ladak, and the third accused, Bilal Amrohi, could reach a settlement with businessman, Iqbal Mir Sharma and hence, the trio will have to undergo a trial. The report further stated that public prosecutor, Waajid Shaikh, confirmed that Sharma is in no mood to settle the matter outside court. Reportedly, the hearing was held on September 4, 2015, at Esplanade court and none of the parties were present. Though the court has suggested mediation between parties in June, both the parties failed to explore the option. Moreover, the Phantom star was open to negotiate, but the businessman, who registered the case against him did not, concludes the report.
Click on the next slide to know why supreme court issued a notice to Dimple Kapadia...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
The Supreme Court, (August 7, 2015) issued a notice to actress Dimple Kapadia on a petition by Anita Advani seeking restoration of her complaint of being subjected to domestic violence subsequent to the death of yesteryear's film star Rajesh Khanna. An apex court bench headed by Chief Justice HL Dattu issued notice on Advani's plea challenging Bombay High Court’s order quashing her complaint of domestic violence against Kapadia and others. Appearing for Advani, senior counsel CA Sundaram told the court that his client was living with Rajesh Khanna for 25 years following his estrangement from Kapadia.
Read on to know why Bangistan’s trailer ran into legal trouble…
When celebs ran into legal trouble
While Bangistan is in trouble much before its release, read on to find out why Sooraj Pancholi has reasons to worry about…
When celebs ran into legal trouble
While Sooraj Pancholi is going through a harrowing phase in his personal life, Sunny Deol found himself in the eye of the storm over a leaked trailer of his upcoming release, Mohalla Assi.
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Read on to know why Peepli Live’s co-director has been arrested...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
While on the topic of legal troubles, read on to find out what's happening in the case against Saif Ali Khan for the infamous brawl...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Recently, Amitabh Bachchan and Abhishek Bachchan have also fallen sour in the eyes of law as a case has been filed against them by the Ghaziabad court. Read on to know more...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
While Amitabh and Abhishek are in legal trouble, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan too found herself in trouble over Sarabjit Singh's biopic. Read further to know more...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
While the fate of the biopic is yet to be decided, read further to know which actor was recently arrested for alleged drunk driving…
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Like this Hollywood actor, some Bollywood celebrities like Amitabh Bachchan, Madhuri Dixit, Priety Zinta and others too were embroiled in legal troubles. Read further to know more..
When celebs ran into legal trouble
There are many instances when celebs are dragged into a controversy. Click on to know more about the Madras Cafe actress, who was arrested on charges of cheating...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
While the Madras Café actress is in a soup for the scam she was allegedly involved in, Amitabh Bachchan was also dragged into a controversy for endorsing a brand of instant noodles. Read on to find out more...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Read on to know more about Madhuri Dixit's legal tussle over the endorsement...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
While Madhuri deals with the situation, read further to know how Ali Fazal landed himself in a legal trouble...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
A report on Mid-day.com quoted a source as saying that Ali stays alone in his Bandra flat and his friends keep visiting him all the time. The source further revealed that Ali had been partying a little too often with his female friends visiting him. Reportedly, the actor has been warned against playing loud music and having too many guests coming over his place.
The report also quoted Ali Fazal as saying that he and his friends weren’t making noise. He further said that someone had inquired but it was a perceived as a complaint by some people. He also added that he would invite people of the entire building at his next party.
Read on to find out why the Enforcement Directorate inquired Mithun Chakraborty recently…
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Read on to find out why Hansal Mehta had to contact the cops...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Read on to know why British pop star Robbie Williams and his wife Ayda Field have been slapped with a lawsuit...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Read further to know how ace choreographer Shiamak Davar got into legal trouble...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Read further to know how singer Abhijeet Bhattacharya got into legal trouble...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Read on to know how Ghajini actress Asin got into legal trouble...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
While Asin got away, read on to know what happened in the Salman Khan arms' case...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Salman was present in the court along with his counsel and answered the questions posed by the court, the report stated. Salman Khan and a few other Bollywood stars were accused of poaching blackbucks on the midnight of October 1-2, 1998, during the shooting of Hindi movie Hum Saath Saath Hain. Two blackbucks, a protected animal under the Wildlife Protection Act, were killed on the outskirts of Kankani village near Jodhpur. Salman is accused of carrying and using illegal arms. He is also alleged to have been carrying arms with expired license.
Read further to know how Chetan Bhagat got into a legal trouble...
When celebs ran into legal trouble
Read further to know why Abhishek Kapoor was asked to refund Rs 60 lakh...
Start a Conversation
Post comment