Texas law requires schools to decide on daily prayer time, but most districts vote against it

Texas school districts have largely rejected a new law allowing students and staff to participate in a daily prayer and devotional period, according to reporting by The Texas Tribune and The Associated Press. Senate Bill 11, passed by the Texas Legislature, required school boards to decide by March 1 whether to offer this optional noninstructional time, during which students could pray or read religious texts such as the Bible.

While the law included specific rules on parental consent and prohibited broadcasting prayers over school systems, only about 15 districts have opted in. Many urban, suburban, and rural districts chose not to participate, citing administrative challenges, existing protections for religious practice, and concerns over promoting a particular faith.

Why districts declined

School officials pointed to the practical difficulties of managing parental consent forms, as SB 11 requires districts to obtain signed waivers from families, acknowledging that students voluntarily participate and parents cannot sue the school for alleged violations. Some districts also resisted what they viewed as state leaders promoting a conservative Christian agenda, even in communities that are politically conservative.

Alex Kotara, vice president of the Karnes City school board in southeast Texas, told AP News, “It passes the buck to local districts to make that decision, but it also does it in a way that requires them to opt out if they don’t participate, which can be misinterpreted as blocking prayer in school.” Several districts said that federal, state, and local policies already allow students to organize religious clubs or prayer periods, making the new law largely unnecessary.

Faith leaders and civil rights advocates also voiced concerns. More than 160 Texas religious leaders urged districts to oppose the policy, citing the administrative burden, students’ existing rights to practice their religion, and the potential harm to children who decide not to participate. Legal experts warned that the law could challenge the separation between church and state.

Supporters cite expanded religious rights

Rep. David Spiller, the bill’s sponsor, emphasized that SB 11 is not mandatory. “It’s not a gotcha bill,” he told The Texas Tribune. Spiller argued that the legislation builds on existing protections, giving schools the option to provide time for prayer while allowing students to freely choose whether to attend.

Some districts that opted in, like Aledo in North Texas, did so not because they strongly supported the law, but to reaffirm students’ constitutional rights. “Basically, the state Legislature forced us to vote on something schools already support, and our vote was really just to reaffirm the constitutional rights of students,” Aledo school board President Forrest Collins told The Texas Tribune. Collins described the law as somewhat redundant, saying the vote felt like a formality rather than a policy change.

Broader context

SB 11 is part of a series of measures in Texas public education aimed at incorporating Christian principles. Past legislation has required schools to post the Ten Commandments in classrooms, allowed unlicensed chaplains to counsel students, and set the foundation for optional state curriculum references to Christianity.

Despite support from some state leaders, including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who encouraged students to engage with the Lord’s Prayer “as taught by Jesus Christ” according to AP News, most districts declined. Officials cited concerns about promoting a single religious viewpoint, additional administrative work, and the fact that students already have the right to practice their religion.

The law’s rollout highlights the tension between state-level legislative initiatives and local school boards’ discretion. Even in conservative communities, districts appear cautious about implementing policies that could be perceived as endorsing a specific religion, signaling a preference to uphold existing rights without creating additional obligations.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!