Straight answers

The spiritual & temporal leader of Tibetans in exile on non-violence as the response to conflict
I regard terrible destructive action as acts of hatred; for, violence is the result of destructive emotions. Events of this kind make it clear that if we allow our intelligence to be guided by negative emotions such as hatred, the consequences are disastrous.
It is appropriate to respond to an act of violence by employing the principles of non-violence.This is of great importance. The attacks on the US were shocking, but retaliation by going to war might not be the best solution in the long run. Ultimately, only non-violence can contain terrorism. Problems within human society should be solved in a humanitarian way, for which non-violence provides the proper approach.
We should explore the use of non-violence as a long-term measure to control terrorism of every kind. But we need a well coordinated, long-term strategy. The proper way of resolving differences is through dialogue, compromise and negotiations, through human understanding and humility. We need to appreciate that genuine peace comes about through mutual understanding, respect and trust. To punish an entire country for the misdeeds of an enemy who cannot be found may prove to be futile. Dealing with such situations as we face now requires a broader perspective.
Those who carry out violent acts are also human beings. If something similar had happened to their family and friends, presumably they, too, would have experienced pain and suffering. And as human beings, they would naturally have had a desire to avoid this suffering. We need to understand what motivated them to behave the way they did — if we are to avoid future repetition of these awful events.
I believe no religion endorses terrorism. The essence of all major religions is compassion, forgiveness, self-discipline, brotherhood and charity. All religions have the potential to strengthen human values and to develop general harmony. But individuals twist religious beliefs for their own ends. There are people who use religion as a cover to achieve their vested interests, so it would be wrong to blame their particular religion. Religious divisions have lately become dangerous once more — and yet, pluralism, under which everybody is free to practice his or her own faith, is part of the fabric of contemporary society. Buddhism might be good for me, but I can''t insist that it will also be good for you or anybody else. My own wish and prayer is for everyone to remain calm.