Row in Congress over new district presidents

Row in Congress over new district presidents
Patna: The appointment of 53 District Congress Committee (DCC) presidents by the state Congress has triggered controversy with objections being raised over caste representation in the list announced on March 30 under the party’s all-India Sangathan Srijan Abhiyan.Some party leaders have alleged the list does not provide adequate representation to various castes and caste groups. They claimed the interests of backward caste and extremely backward caste groups were not properly addressed and the representation appeared tilted in favour of upper caste groups.
Watch
Tamil Nadu Politics Is More Casteist Than UP And Bihar, Vijay's Impact Is Waning: Yashwant Deshmukh
State Congress chief Rajesh Ram also expressed concern over the issue while speaking to reporters at the party’s state headquarters Sadaquat Ashram earlier this week.“The list of 53 DCC presidents cleared by the high command has a major lacuna in the sense adequate representation has not been given to various castes and classes,” Ram said.“I have registered my complaint with the party high command, including All India Congress Committee general secretary K C Venugopal. The revised list is expected,” Ram added.Venugopal had released the list of the 53 DCC presidents with the approval of party president Mallikarjun Kharge.
The appointments were made from panels of names suggested for specific districts by observers appointed by the AICC under the SSA programme.The SSA aims to strengthen district units and organisational structures down to the grassroots level, including block Congress committees.A state Congress source said the DCC presidents were selected on the basis of feedback and research conducted by observers in different districts. The source added social representation would also be ensured in other organisational bodies of district units.However, not all leaders have opposed the appointments.“The 53 DCC presidents were appointed from the panel of names suggested by the respective district observers. It is true not all party seniors in a district were consulted, but I am not aggrieved,” a senior state Congress functionary said.“The DCC is one thing and the Pradesh Congress Committee is a different thing. Both the units have to be strong and vibrant,” the functionary added.

author
About the AuthorAbhay Singh

Having done higher secondary from Sainik School Telaiya, Hazaribagh (now in Jharkhand), graduated in history from Patna College. Started as a freelance journalist for Free Press Journal (Mumbai) from Patna, and then joined The Times of India, Patna, as a staff reporter, got promoted to senior reporter, and later, briefly functioned as news editor. In reporting, initially covered districts like Darbhanga and Bhagalpur on events and various aspects, and then from Patna, have covered state politics, political parties, elections, state assembly, government, cabinet, departments like finance, irrigation and a few others, also CM, occasionally PM's tours, and social issues. Have written two books -- first, Bihar in Messianic Times, second, The First Address, on the Governor House (Bihar), commissioned by the Response (Advertisement) wing of The Times Of India, Patna.

End of Article
Follow Us On Social Media