This story is from January 04, 2022
HC quashes case against protesters
Madurai: The Madras high court on Monday quashed the trial court proceedings against 26 people, including CPM functionary U Vasuki, in a case registered against them for staging a protest condemning the inaction on part of the police officials in taking action against those who distributed money to voters in Madurai West constituency during the 2016 assembly election.
The petitioners stated that Vasuki contested the assembly election from Madurai West. On May 13, 2016, AIADMK party cadres distributed cash to voters. The CPM cadres caught hold of the miscreants and informed the police. However, the police set the miscreants at liberty and took the CPM cadres to the police station.
Vasuki along with the others staged a protest at Jaihindpuram main road. Following this incident, the Jaihindpuram police had registered a case against 250 people, including the petitioners.
The petitioners stated that the case is pending before the trial court for the past five years, the petitioners moved the HC Madurai bench, in 2021.
Justice G R Swaminathan said that since the petitioners were carrying on their election campaign, their assembly is a legitimate exercise of their democratic right and it cannot be said to be unlawful.
The judge said that blocking the roads would not amount to an offence under Section 341. No damages were caused to the public properties. The petitioners were not indulging in any act of violence, but they legitimately staged their protest against distribution of cash for votes.
Observing that the continuance of proceedings is not warranted, the judge allowed the petition and quashed the trial court proceedings.
Vasuki along with the others staged a protest at Jaihindpuram main road. Following this incident, the Jaihindpuram police had registered a case against 250 people, including the petitioners.
The petitioners stated that the case is pending before the trial court for the past five years, the petitioners moved the HC Madurai bench, in 2021.
Justice G R Swaminathan said that since the petitioners were carrying on their election campaign, their assembly is a legitimate exercise of their democratic right and it cannot be said to be unlawful.
The judge said that blocking the roads would not amount to an offence under Section 341. No damages were caused to the public properties. The petitioners were not indulging in any act of violence, but they legitimately staged their protest against distribution of cash for votes.
Observing that the continuance of proceedings is not warranted, the judge allowed the petition and quashed the trial court proceedings.
Popular from City
- Delhi assembly polls: Muslim voters keep AAP and Congress hopes alive
- Counsellor held for sexual exploitation and blackmail of 50 students at Nagpur clinic over 15 years
- ‘Encroaching’ on stepwell: Sambhal family evicted from home in an hour
- Man killed in road accident near Bhikaji Cama Place in Delhi
- Steve Jobs’ wife Laurene Powell Jobs prays at Kashi Vishwanath temple, heads for Maha Kumbh
end of article
Trending Stories
- Sundar Pichai to employees: As we start the year, I have been reviewing ...
- Facebook founder angry, says Apple is making them pay for 'failing iPhone sales'
- Brazil judge who suspended Elon Musk’s X in the country has ‘warning’ for Google, Apple, Microsoft and other tech giants
- Elon Musk is worried about Jeff Bezos ex-wife MacKenzie Scott’s Rs 1,36,000 crore donation; here’s why
- Shakambhari Purnima 2025: Date, Time, Puja Rituals and Significance
- EAM Jaishankar to represent India at Donald Trump's swearing-in ceremony in US
- Elon Musk's one-word take on alarming population decline in India and China
Visual Stories
- 14 popular vegetarian dishes around the world
- 11 biggest fruits in the world
- How to grow Pomegranate in the terrace or balcony garden
- 10 popular vegetarian dishes for a nutritious breakfast
- Krithi Shetty embodies timeless grace
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment