This story is from June 29, 2020
Court dismisses CISF armourer’s reinstatement plea
Madurai: Madras high court has dismissed the plea moved by a man who was awarded punishment of compulsory retirement from CISF for negligence in handling a repair in a rifle which caused loss of sight of another CISF personnel after a live round hit his right eye during training at Villupuram in 2008.
Justice V Bhavani Subbaroyan observed that petitioner C Jayabalan had committed grave misconduct and the authorities have rightly awarded the punishment of compulsory retirement. Jayabalan was posted at
As the negligence of the petitioner caused permanent damage / loss of vision to the eye of Sahadevan, the authorities issued a charge memo. Later, after an inquiry, they punished him by reducing his pay by three stages for two years. Though he appealed against it, it was unsuccessful.
Meanwhile, the CISF, southern sector inspector general in Chennai suo motu reviewed the case and found that the penalty awarded and confirmed by the appellate authority was inadequate.
the Neyveli Lignite Corporation
inCuddalore district
and was on duty as head constable/armourer along with others during training at Khanjanur police firing range in Villupuram on July 20, 2008. When CISFjawan N Sahadevan
was in a lying position for firing, a live round got stuck in the chamber of his rifle. Sahadevan called the armourer to do the needful. While trying to repair it, the petitioner placed the screwdriver at the base of the cocking handle and hit the screwdriver using a hammer twice slowly and then gave aforceful hit
. Consequently, the cocking handle was released and the live round which was stuck in the chamber came out with force hitting the right eye of Sahadevan damaging its retina.As the negligence of the petitioner caused permanent damage / loss of vision to the eye of Sahadevan, the authorities issued a charge memo. Later, after an inquiry, they punished him by reducing his pay by three stages for two years. Though he appealed against it, it was unsuccessful.
Meanwhile, the CISF, southern sector inspector general in Chennai suo motu reviewed the case and found that the penalty awarded and confirmed by the appellate authority was inadequate.
Popular from City
- Coach attendant, TTE thrash passenger onboard Amritsar-Katihar Express after 'booze party'; video goes viral
- Overcrowding, unregulated token distribution: What triggered deadly Tirupati stampede
- Massive fire breaks out at residential building in Mumbai
- 'My hubby watches from Saudi as his friends rape me here': UP woman
- Dressed as bride and groom on 26th anniversary, Nagpur couple parties till midnight, dies by suicide
end of article
Trending Stories
- Elon Musk's one-word take on alarming population decline in India and China
- How Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's one sentence wiped out $8 billion in market cap of quantum computing companies
- CTET Result 2024 for December session declared, check direct link
- Massive fire breaks out at residential building in Mumbai
- Integrate KR Pura loop with Hebbal flyover in 100 days, CS tells BDA
- CBSE issues important notice for schools on mandatory document uploading and teacher details
- Vaikuntha Ekadashi 2025: Date, Parana Time, Puja Rituals and Significance
Visual Stories
- 14 popular vegetarian dishes around the world
- 11 biggest fruits in the world
- How to grow Pomegranate in the terrace or balcony garden
- 10 popular vegetarian dishes for a nutritious breakfast
- Krithi Shetty embodies timeless grace
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment