This story is from July 20, 2021
TMC rakes up Nisith nationality issue, disrupts PM listing of ministers in Parl
Kolkata: Trinamool Congress on Monday took the citizenship controversy over newly appointed MoS home and Cooch Behar MP Nisith Pramanik to
“Ministers are supposed to be citizens of India. Congress’ Rajya Sabha MP Ripun Bora had already written to the prime
In Lok Sabha, protests were led by party leader Sudip Bandyopadhyay and chief whip Kalyan Banerjee.
Asked whether Trinamool was mulling any legal move against the Union minister of state, Derek said: “We will not allow this minister to reply to questions or table papers (in Parliament).” He, however, did not specify the legal measures but said: “What we do inside and outside Parliament will be decided daily. Keep a watch, ball-by-ball, in the days to come.”
Ray, Derek’s colleague in the Upper House, cited Rule 249 to argue that the PM has to lay in the House a list of ministers after cabinet reshuffle. He cited Wikipedia to claim that the MoS home was reportedly a Bangladeshi.
Pramanik has not issued any statement after the citizenship row surfaced. Bengal BJP general secretary Sayantan Basu, however, has fanned the controversy by telling media that the Union minister had come as a refugee from Bangladesh. Pramanik, however, was born in 1986.
Trinamool said it wanted the Centre to discuss issues in the House, not outside, and alleged that the government was “running away from the House”. “The (Union) government is not in a mood to discuss. We have given multiple notices for discussions inside the House. We had flagged issues on fuel and LPG price hike, repeal of farm laws, Covid and vaccine issues, reinstate the MPLAD funds, attack on federalism and economy. But no discussion was allowed today,” Derek said. “A part of parliamentary proceedings, a business advisory committee meeting was scheduled at 4pm on Monday. Even that was deferred,” he added.
Parliament
, refusing to let Prime Minister Narendra Modi introduce his new council of ministers. The party said it would keep pressing the issue both inside and outside Parliament.minister
on it. Our party chief whip in the Rajya Sabha, Sukhendu Sekhar Ray, has also raised the issue. That is why both in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, we did not let the prime minister introduce a person who is not even a citizen of India,” Trinamool spokesperson and Rajya Sabha leader Derek O’Brien said.In Lok Sabha, protests were led by party leader Sudip Bandyopadhyay and chief whip Kalyan Banerjee.
Asked whether Trinamool was mulling any legal move against the Union minister of state, Derek said: “We will not allow this minister to reply to questions or table papers (in Parliament).” He, however, did not specify the legal measures but said: “What we do inside and outside Parliament will be decided daily. Keep a watch, ball-by-ball, in the days to come.”
Ray, Derek’s colleague in the Upper House, cited Rule 249 to argue that the PM has to lay in the House a list of ministers after cabinet reshuffle. He cited Wikipedia to claim that the MoS home was reportedly a Bangladeshi.
Pramanik has not issued any statement after the citizenship row surfaced. Bengal BJP general secretary Sayantan Basu, however, has fanned the controversy by telling media that the Union minister had come as a refugee from Bangladesh. Pramanik, however, was born in 1986.
Trinamool said it wanted the Centre to discuss issues in the House, not outside, and alleged that the government was “running away from the House”. “The (Union) government is not in a mood to discuss. We have given multiple notices for discussions inside the House. We had flagged issues on fuel and LPG price hike, repeal of farm laws, Covid and vaccine issues, reinstate the MPLAD funds, attack on federalism and economy. But no discussion was allowed today,” Derek said. “A part of parliamentary proceedings, a business advisory committee meeting was scheduled at 4pm on Monday. Even that was deferred,” he added.
Top Comment
A Dutt
1213 days ago
The onus of proving nationality rests on the person concerned. He should place his credentials in the public domain. He wanted a separate state. If he is an Indian citizen, he has the right to raise the demand. If he is not, then he should be booked under the UAPA.Read allPost comment
Popular from City
- SDM slap row: Rajasthan Police arrest independent candidate Naresh Meena
- UPPSC Prelims Exam 2024 to be held in single day
- Dehradun bizman flagged highspeed MUV before fatal crash that killed 6
- 'Batenge toh katenge' not acceptable in Maharashtra, you do it in north: Ajit Pawar
- Watch: 42 passengers escape unharmed as Purvanchal Express bus catches fire in Lucknow
end of article
Trending Stories
- NASA alert! 'God of Chaos' asteroid approaching Earth on November 13 sparks worldwide concern
- 'Couldn't have asked for better company': Zomato CEO's heartfelt message as rival Swiggy makes market debut
- Sunita Williams’ Starliner delays impacted hospitalised NASA astronauts' return, now they reveal post-splashdown symptoms
- Who is Tulsi Gabbard? Meet the Hindu American appointed by Trump as US Director of National Intelligence
- India create history, set a new T20 world record during thrilling win against South Africa
- CBSE Board Exam 2025: Syllabus for class 10, 12 reduced by 15%, open book exam for select subjects and other important changes announced
- Watch: ICC's new Champions Trophy promo confirms Pakistan as host
Visual Stories
- 7 tips to discipline a child without scolding or hitting
- 9 low-maintenance creepers that will add charm to your balcony
- How to make South Indian-style Mushroom Ghee Roast
- 10 unique varieties of Gulab Jamun that are must-try
- 10 animals found only in Africa
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT