Women’s entry: Supreme Court to consider Sabarimala review pleas today; Oppn asks govt to clarify position
Kochi/T'puram: With the Supreme Court scheduled to consider the review and writ petitions related to its 2018 verdict permitting the entry of women of all ages into the Lord Ayyappa temple on Monday, the issue has sparked a political debate in the state after a brief hiatus.Opposition leader V D Satheesan urged chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan to clarify whether the govt was willing to replace the affidavit it submitted before the apex court with a new one. Satheesan told reporters in Kochi on Sunday that the govt should clarify its stance.
The first Pinarayi govt took a strong stance in favour of women's entry into Sabarimala but it went back on it following intense protests, Satheesan said. "They held a Global Ayyappa Sangamam and announced their withdrawal from all related matters. Now, as the apex court is considering the case, the govt has submitted an affidavit supporting women's entry. They can't play hidden games; the stance must be clear," Satheesan said.AICC general secretary K C Venugopal also said the state govt should revise its affidavit in the Sabarimala matter and that there was no need for any reconsideration within the party. He claimed that the entire state of Kerala was demanding such a step and questioned how the govt could backtrack.The ruling CPM, meanwhile, said it could not disclose what the govt would submit in court.CPM state secretary M V Govindan said there was no cause for concern and added that the dignity of democracy and the interests of devotees should be upheld."The party will state its position when required. Tomorrow, it's the govt that has to speak and it will do so," he told reporters in Palakkad.When asked whether the CPM would change its stand on the Sabarimala women's entry issue, Govindan said nothing was unchangeable but refrained from giving a clear reply.In Thrissur, CPM politburo member A Vijayaraghavan said a consensus needs to be evolved on the issue, taking into account both the interests of devotees and legal considerations. He said the matter was complex.Another senior CPM leader and state law minister P Rajeeve accused Satheesan and a section of the media of showing undue haste. He said the govt's stand could not be decided in a hurry and would be clarified after the review bench is constituted.He added that it is for the new bench to decide whether the government's explanation is required and said that it is not the govt's stand that is currently under review."Why this unprecedented haste? Let the Supreme Court decide which bench will consider the matter — whether the Constitution bench will hear the pleas or a new bench will be formed," he told reporters in Kochi.Nair Service Society (NSS), which had adopted a strong stand against the entry of young women into Sabarimala, also clarified its position."The govt should take whatever measures are needed to maintain the traditional customs and rituals at Sabarimala. If a revised affidavit needs to be submitted in this regard, it should be done," said NSS general secretary G Sukumaran Nair.The LDF govt had faced severe criticism from a section of Ayyappa devotees and the Sangh Parivar for facilitating the entry of two women of menstruating age into the Sabarimala temple. (With inputs from agencies)
The first Pinarayi govt took a strong stance in favour of women's entry into Sabarimala but it went back on it following intense protests, Satheesan said. "They held a Global Ayyappa Sangamam and announced their withdrawal from all related matters. Now, as the apex court is considering the case, the govt has submitted an affidavit supporting women's entry. They can't play hidden games; the stance must be clear," Satheesan said.AICC general secretary K C Venugopal also said the state govt should revise its affidavit in the Sabarimala matter and that there was no need for any reconsideration within the party. He claimed that the entire state of Kerala was demanding such a step and questioned how the govt could backtrack.The ruling CPM, meanwhile, said it could not disclose what the govt would submit in court.CPM state secretary M V Govindan said there was no cause for concern and added that the dignity of democracy and the interests of devotees should be upheld."The party will state its position when required. Tomorrow, it's the govt that has to speak and it will do so," he told reporters in Palakkad.When asked whether the CPM would change its stand on the Sabarimala women's entry issue, Govindan said nothing was unchangeable but refrained from giving a clear reply.In Thrissur, CPM politburo member A Vijayaraghavan said a consensus needs to be evolved on the issue, taking into account both the interests of devotees and legal considerations. He said the matter was complex.Another senior CPM leader and state law minister P Rajeeve accused Satheesan and a section of the media of showing undue haste. He said the govt's stand could not be decided in a hurry and would be clarified after the review bench is constituted.He added that it is for the new bench to decide whether the government's explanation is required and said that it is not the govt's stand that is currently under review."Why this unprecedented haste? Let the Supreme Court decide which bench will consider the matter — whether the Constitution bench will hear the pleas or a new bench will be formed," he told reporters in Kochi.Nair Service Society (NSS), which had adopted a strong stand against the entry of young women into Sabarimala, also clarified its position."The govt should take whatever measures are needed to maintain the traditional customs and rituals at Sabarimala. If a revised affidavit needs to be submitted in this regard, it should be done," said NSS general secretary G Sukumaran Nair.The LDF govt had faced severe criticism from a section of Ayyappa devotees and the Sangh Parivar for facilitating the entry of two women of menstruating age into the Sabarimala temple. (With inputs from agencies)
Top Comment
S
Shekar Natesh
1 hour ago
Just cannot understand why the judiciary is interfering in such matters which are not related to them.Can they do the same with Muslims wherein the females cannot do namaz along with males in the mosque?Read allPost comment
Popular from City
- ‘She chose to marry someone else’: WhatsApp text, 15-year relationship and more; chilling details in Noida’s Valentine’s Day car murder
- Addicted to online gambling, Bengaluru staffer at Indian Bank steals gold worth Rs 4 crore from customer lockers
- Mumbai couple back from Thailand cheated of 1,000 Thai Baht; driver demanded cash mid-ride, 2 held
- ‘Touched me repeatedly’: Bihar man held for molesting co-passenger on Hanoi flight
- Rs 9-lakh DUSU bills unpaid, ex-DU president Ronak Khatri’s LLB degree withheld; case in HC
end of article
Trending Stories
- T20 World Cup: India crush Pakistan by 61 runs, secure Super 8 spot
- JEE Main 2026 Result Date & Time Live Updates: Session 1 result expected to be released tomorrow, check latest updates here
- India vs Pakistan, T20 World Cup 2026 Live Streaming: When, where and how to watch IND vs PAK live on TV and online
- ‘She chose to marry someone else’: WhatsApp text, 15-year relationship and more; chilling details in Noida’s Valentine’s Day car murder
- No handshake at toss: India's stance against Pakistan continues in T20 World Cup despite calls for 'spirit'
- 'Psychological edge already ours': Former Pakistan captain makes bold claim ahead of India clash
- IND vs PAK, Colombo weather update: What happens if rain washes out India vs Pakistan T20 World Cup match?
Featured in city
- Speeding Thar crashes into police patrol vehicle near CM Nitish Kumar's residence
- Bengal man’s body parts found in 3 plastic bags; BLO confesses to killing, affair angle with victim’s wife probed
- Lucknow: Woman dies during childbirth; Class 12 student, BA graduate held for illegal C-section
- ‘She chose to marry someone else’: WhatsApp text, 15-year relationship and more; chilling details in Noida’s Valentine’s Day car murder
- ‘Criminal’ guests at wedding cost Bishnoi constable his job; inquiry finds 8 active offenders at ceremony
- ‘Touched me repeatedly’: Bihar man held for molesting co-passenger on Hanoi flight
Photostories
- 8 Indian dishes that were once considered “poor man’s food” but are now premium
- Apple TV’s five must-watch sitcoms: 'Bad Sisters,' 'Shrinking' and more
- What is a convertible car? Features, types and 5 key facts every buyer should know
- Shahid Kapoor, Shah Rukh Khan, Varun Dhawan: Actors who turned grey on screen and left audiences stunned
- From Ram Kapoor to Sakshi Tanwar, Ronit Roy and more – TV celebrities who own lavish properties
- Mumbai’s Bandra east skywalk opens: 680m elevated link to BKC, western express highway
- Shahid Kapoor-Kareena Kapoor to Ranbir Kapoor-Deepika Padukone: Bollywood exes who reunited on screen after break up
- Rajpal Yadav, Salman Khan, Ranveer Singh: A look at Bollywood's ongoing legal storms
- 5 important rivers that pass through Indian national parks
- 7 protein-rich air fryer snacks under 200 calories
Videos
02:24 Former BSP leader Naseemuddin Siddiqui joins Samajwadi Party in presence of Akhilesh Yadav03:03 Akhilesh Yadav Attacks BJP on Trade Deal, Says India’s Market ‘Gifted to US’, Mentions Epstein File05:21 “Active But Shut Out” Nafisa Raihana Over Low Women Nominations03:38 “Unfortunate ”: Oppn Targets India-Pak Match After Pahalgam, Delhi Blasts03:12 Karnataka: Two Killed In Chemical Tank Explosion At Kirti Chemicals In Mandya05:32 ‘I Challenge Rahul Gandhi’: Amit Shah Slams Cong For ‘Misleading Farmers’ On India-US Trade Deal04:36 'India Wedded To Strategic Autonomy': EAM Jaishankar After Marco Rubio’s Russian Oil Claim03:11 Indian Student Saketh Sreenivasaiah Found Dead In U.S. Days After Going Missing In California03:20 ‘Feels Like A Gas Chamber’: Yogi Adityanath’s Swipe At Delhi Over Pollution, Hails Gorakhpur's AQI
Up Next