HHRC panel asks Haryana to frame rules for transporting bodies from hospitals
Gurgaon: Haryana Human Rights Commission (HHRC) has recommended that the state health department frame a policy to ensure free and dignified transportation of bodies of patients from economically weaker families who die during treatment in civil hospitals, calling the absence of such support a serious failure of governance and compassion. The commission took suo motu cognisance of a TOI report, ‘Woman dies in hospital, family out on cash takes body home on cart', published on Jan 30, which documented how a family in Faridabad's Sarurpur was forced to transport the body of a woman who died during treatment in a govt hospital using a motorised pushcart.
Describing the episode as a grave affront to human dignity, the commission said it exposed deep systemic gaps in the public health and administrative framework. In an order issued on Friday, a panel headed by chairperson Justice Lalit Batra, with members Kuldip Jain and Deep Bhatia, underscored the ethical and constitutional dimensions of the case. "The family was compelled to transport the body from Badshah Khan Civil Hospital to their place of residence, situated merely about 7-10km away, without any logistical, institutional or financial assistance from the hospital or any state agency. The fact that such indignity occurred even within a short distance underscores not only the absence of any effective mechanism to ensure continuity of care and dignified handling of deceased persons, particularly indigent patients, but also reflects a disturbing apathy of both society and state instrumentalities towards a human being beyond death. This incident starkly demonstrates that the obligation of the state to uphold human dignity does not cease with death and that the failure to provide even basic post-death support amounts to a grave abdication of constitutional and moral responsibility," the commission said. The HHRC noted that similar incidents have been reported across the country, where poor families are forced to carry sick relatives or dead bodies on carts, motorcycles or rickshaws due to a lack of institutional support. Such recurring episodes, it said, pointed to a broader pattern of neglect rather than isolated lapses. The TOI report had highlighted how the family from Sarurpur village was forced to take the body of Anuradha, a 35-year-old woman who died during tuberculosis treatment at a Faridabad's Badshah Khan Civil Hospital on Jan 28, in a motorised pushcart as they could not afford Rs 700 for private transport and allegedly received no ambulance support from the hospital. The family had told TOI that they had exhausted their savings after seeking treatment for her at several govt facilities, including AIIMS and Safdarjung Hospital. Quoting directly from the newspaper report, the commission noted, "...the motorised open pushcart was driven by aged father-in-law of the deceased, and the husband and mother-in-law accompanying in mourning, the woman's seven-year-old son holding firmly onto the sheet covering his mother's body to prevent it from being blown away by the wind, striving to preserve whatever dignity he could for her final journey." Such circumstances, the commission observed, were "wholly incompatible with the standards of humane governance expected in a welfare state". While acknowledging that Haryana already provides free ambulance services for pregnant women, the commission was critical of the explanations offered by health officials in this case. Some authorities claimed there was no provision to transport bodies in health department ambulances, while others suggested the family had not requested such a service. The commission said these responses revealed a clear "policy gap" and a troubling lack of sensitivity. "The right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution includes dignity even after death. Forcing families to transport dead bodies in such conditions reflects failure of the State's constitutional and moral responsibilities," it said. The commission has issued notices to the additional chief secretary (health and family welfare), the director general of health services and the civil surgeon of Faridabad, directing them to submit detailed action taken reports at least one week before the next hearing, scheduled for April 2.
Describing the episode as a grave affront to human dignity, the commission said it exposed deep systemic gaps in the public health and administrative framework. In an order issued on Friday, a panel headed by chairperson Justice Lalit Batra, with members Kuldip Jain and Deep Bhatia, underscored the ethical and constitutional dimensions of the case. "The family was compelled to transport the body from Badshah Khan Civil Hospital to their place of residence, situated merely about 7-10km away, without any logistical, institutional or financial assistance from the hospital or any state agency. The fact that such indignity occurred even within a short distance underscores not only the absence of any effective mechanism to ensure continuity of care and dignified handling of deceased persons, particularly indigent patients, but also reflects a disturbing apathy of both society and state instrumentalities towards a human being beyond death. This incident starkly demonstrates that the obligation of the state to uphold human dignity does not cease with death and that the failure to provide even basic post-death support amounts to a grave abdication of constitutional and moral responsibility," the commission said. The HHRC noted that similar incidents have been reported across the country, where poor families are forced to carry sick relatives or dead bodies on carts, motorcycles or rickshaws due to a lack of institutional support. Such recurring episodes, it said, pointed to a broader pattern of neglect rather than isolated lapses. The TOI report had highlighted how the family from Sarurpur village was forced to take the body of Anuradha, a 35-year-old woman who died during tuberculosis treatment at a Faridabad's Badshah Khan Civil Hospital on Jan 28, in a motorised pushcart as they could not afford Rs 700 for private transport and allegedly received no ambulance support from the hospital. The family had told TOI that they had exhausted their savings after seeking treatment for her at several govt facilities, including AIIMS and Safdarjung Hospital. Quoting directly from the newspaper report, the commission noted, "...the motorised open pushcart was driven by aged father-in-law of the deceased, and the husband and mother-in-law accompanying in mourning, the woman's seven-year-old son holding firmly onto the sheet covering his mother's body to prevent it from being blown away by the wind, striving to preserve whatever dignity he could for her final journey." Such circumstances, the commission observed, were "wholly incompatible with the standards of humane governance expected in a welfare state". While acknowledging that Haryana already provides free ambulance services for pregnant women, the commission was critical of the explanations offered by health officials in this case. Some authorities claimed there was no provision to transport bodies in health department ambulances, while others suggested the family had not requested such a service. The commission said these responses revealed a clear "policy gap" and a troubling lack of sensitivity. "The right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution includes dignity even after death. Forcing families to transport dead bodies in such conditions reflects failure of the State's constitutional and moral responsibilities," it said. The commission has issued notices to the additional chief secretary (health and family welfare), the director general of health services and the civil surgeon of Faridabad, directing them to submit detailed action taken reports at least one week before the next hearing, scheduled for April 2.
Popular from City
- Row over seat in Mumbai local: Assistant manager loses eye in attack, GRP arrest man for throwing stone at train
- Delhi cop held after girlfriend shoots self dead with his service pistol in Noida Extension
- 3rd wife of BJP councillor stabbed to death by stepson in Madhya Pradesh
- Govt reshuffles 20 IAS officers
- 'Assault on free speech': Comedian Kunal Kamra, senior advocate Haresh Jagtiani moves Bombay HC against Sahyog portal
end of article
Trending Stories
- T20 WC: Pakistan lose Farhan and Usman in one over vs Netherlands
- BMC: BJP names Ritu Tawde as Mumbai mayoral candidate; Shiv Sena picks Sanjay Ghadi for deputy mayor
- 8 hours of silence: How Delhi biker fell into 20x14x13-foot killer pit; 'was within 200 metres of home'
- Milwaukee Bucks vs Indiana Pacers (02-06-2026) game preview: When and where to watch, expected lineup, injury report, prediction, and more
- When was the last New England Patriots Super Bowl win? A look back at their most recent title
- “I felt terrible”: Olympian Chloe Kim opens up about the darkest days of her life amid romance with Myles Garrett
- How a single vote cost Drake Maye the NFL MVP to Matthew Stafford
Featured in city
- Rohit Shetty firing case: Mumbai Police arrest 'arms supplier' from Pune; shooter still on run
- H5N1 avian flu scare in Chennai: Several crow deaths reported; public health advisory issued
- Uttarakhand’s Pantnagar airport set for major upgrade: 3,000m runway, new terminal to boost Kumaon connectivity
- Malayalam actor Maniyanpilla Raju accused in hit-and-run outside Trivandrum Club; 2 bikers injured
- As concrete envelops Bannerghatta forests, Indian Institute of Science recommends 5km eco sensitive zone
- Why Delhi needs to take the bull by its horns
Photostories
- Top 10 iconic Japanese fast foods you need to try at least once
- 7 must-try winter street foods in Chandigarh
- Upcoming OTT releases for this week: 'Kohrra Season 2', 'The Lincoln Lawyer Season 4,' and more
- Top luxury trekking motorbikes in 2026: Premium rides for rugged adventures
- India’s major snow-fed rivers: Waterways that have shaped India’s landscape
- 7 irresistible mutton dishes from Jammu and Kashmir that are a must-try in winter
- What happens if the builder does not follow the RERA order?
- 5 national parks in India that are a part of iconic elephant reserves
- 9 things you should avoid buying on Saturday, according to tradition
- 5 things we should never take back from a beach trip
Videos
08:08 Turkey Sides With Pakistan On Kashmir At UN After Sharif’s Rhetoric On India's 'Integral' Territory04:08 'Home-Grown Ills': Islamabad Mosque Blast Triggers Blame Game As India Rejects Pakistan's Blame11:45 Ex-US Official Raymond Vickery Says India Outsmarted Donald Trump Chaos By Sticking To Trade Process07:13 Ex-US Official Raymond Vickery Backs India Red Line On Russian Oil As US Trade Deal Drops Mention04:03 India-US Trade Deal Explained: What The White House Says On Tariffs, Markets And Tech Shifts08:57 PM Modi Calls India-US Trade Pact Framework Great News For Jobs, Make In India And Exports04:44 'We Were Preparing For War': Former DGMO Reveals Inside Story Of India-China Doklam Stand-Off08:46 Grand Welcome To Dance Record: Indian Diaspora Gears Up For PM Modi's Malaysia Visit12:07 Weeks After Noida Techie's Death, Delhi Biker Dies After Falling Into Pit Dug By Jal Board
Up Next
Start a Conversation
Post comment