ENA ‘mother raw material’ for potable liquor and denatured spirit, say states

New Delhi: Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, along with his father Justice Y V Chandrachud, who was CJI for the longest-ever tenure of seven-and-a-half years, are the first father-son duo to head the Indian judiciary. Chandrachud Jr has so far twice overruled his father’s judgments.CJI Chandrachud, while ruling that right to privacy was part of right to life in his August 2017 judgment in K S Puttaswamy case, had overruled the infamous Emergency-era ADM Jabalpur verdict, in which his father was a party to the majority opinion that upheld govt’s power to suspend fundamental rights.In Sept 2018, he overruled his father’s decisions in May 1985 Sowmithri Vishnu case, which upheld the validity of Section 497 of IPC that punished only married men for having sexual relationships outside marriage. The SC’s five-judge bench in Joseph Shine case had decriminalised the penal provision and said adultery could only be cited as a ground for divorce.In the liquor case, Justice B V Nagarathna has been consistently asking questions pertaining to distinguishable features of intoxicating liquor, alcoholic liquor for human consumption and industrial alcohol.Bench of CJI Chandrachud and Justices Hrishikesh Roy, A S Oka, Nagarathna, J B Pardiwala, Manoj Misra, Ujjal Bhuyan, Satish C Sharma and Augustine G Masih has discovered new aspects of interplay of regulating entries in Seventh Schedule: alcoholic liquor for human consumption (Entry 51/84, List II) and intoxicating liquor (Entry 8, List II) and overarching control of Centre over all industries (Entry 51 of List I).Interestingly, there is no mention of industrial alcohol in any entry in the three lists — central, state or concurrent. During the two-day-long inconclusive arguments, lawyers used the words ‘alcohol’ and ‘liquor’ so often that a judge smilingly remarked, “So much alcohol and liquor in the arguments that it has a physical effect.”States argued that ENA or undenatured ethyl alcohol, over which states have exclusive regulatory powers, was the ‘mother raw material’ for potable liquor & denatured spirit. They said ethyl alcohol became industrial alcohol after denaturation and, hence, states alone would logically have exclusive regulatory control over industrial alcohol.Appearing for Uttar Pradesh, senior advocate Arvind Datar said the seven-judge bench comprising then CJI Venkataramiah and Justices Sabyasachi Mukherjee, Ranganath Misra, G L Oza, B C Ray, K N Singh and S Natrajan erred in the Synthetics judgment in 1989 by equating industrial alcohol with ethyl alcohol and rectified spirit.
Stay updated with the latest news on Times of India. Don't miss daily games like Crossword, Sudoku, and Mini Crossword.