SC grants bail to Ahilyanagar murder accused after 10 years as undertrial
CHHATRAPATI SAMBHAJINAGAR: The Supreme Court has granted bail to Ahilyanagar resident Yogesh Pardhe, arrested in a 2015 murder and riot case, observing that the accused had spent more than 10 years in jail as an undertrial. SC also set aside an earlier order of the Bombay high court’s Aurangabad bench rejecting his bail plea.
A bench of Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Vipul M Pancholi passed the order on May 18, while allowing an appeal filed by the accused man against the Sept 18, 2025 order of the Bombay HC’s Aurangabad bench denying him regular bail.
The accused was arrested on Oct 2, 2015 in connection with a case registered for offences punishable under sections 302, 304, 201, 143, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code along with sections 3(1)(3)(10) and 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case relates to an incident that took place on May 16, 2015, following which, the FIR was lodged the same day.
The SC noted that the accused had undergone incarceration for more than 10 years pending trial; except for a brief period during the Covid-19 pandemic when he was temporarily released pursuant to recommendations of the High Power Committee constituted for decongestion of prisons.
The apex court also considered parity with co-accused, who had earlier been granted bail by the apex court on March 20 this year on the same ground of prolonged incarceration.
During the hearing, Siddharth Dharmadhikari, the counsel representing the Maharashtra government informed the SC that the state was not opposing the bail plea considering the “peculiar facts” of the matter and the period already undergone by the accused in custody.
The apex court subsequently set aside the high court order and directed that the accused be released on bail on terms and conditions to be imposed by the trial court. According to submissions made before the court, the defence argued that the accused’s name and role were not mentioned in the original complaint. The defence also relied on the deposition of complainant and prosecution witness, who allegedly failed to identify the accused during trial proceedings while identifying some other accused.
The case was committed to the sessions court on July 25, 2016, and the trial has remained pending since then. Of the 79 prosecution witnesses listed in the chargesheet, 50 have been examined so far, while more than 25 are yet to depose.
Senior Counsels Sanjay Kharde and Satyajeet Kharde, along with advocates Sunny Jadhav and Arun Longani appeared for appellant Pardhe.
The accused was arrested on Oct 2, 2015 in connection with a case registered for offences punishable under sections 302, 304, 201, 143, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code along with sections 3(1)(3)(10) and 3(2)(5) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The case relates to an incident that took place on May 16, 2015, following which, the FIR was lodged the same day.
The SC noted that the accused had undergone incarceration for more than 10 years pending trial; except for a brief period during the Covid-19 pandemic when he was temporarily released pursuant to recommendations of the High Power Committee constituted for decongestion of prisons.
The apex court also considered parity with co-accused, who had earlier been granted bail by the apex court on March 20 this year on the same ground of prolonged incarceration.
During the hearing, Siddharth Dharmadhikari, the counsel representing the Maharashtra government informed the SC that the state was not opposing the bail plea considering the “peculiar facts” of the matter and the period already undergone by the accused in custody.
The apex court subsequently set aside the high court order and directed that the accused be released on bail on terms and conditions to be imposed by the trial court. According to submissions made before the court, the defence argued that the accused’s name and role were not mentioned in the original complaint. The defence also relied on the deposition of complainant and prosecution witness, who allegedly failed to identify the accused during trial proceedings while identifying some other accused.
Senior Counsels Sanjay Kharde and Satyajeet Kharde, along with advocates Sunny Jadhav and Arun Longani appeared for appellant Pardhe.
Comments
Be the first to share a thought and become theFirst Voiceof this News Article
end of article
In Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar
- SC grants bail to Ahilyanagar murder accused after 10 years as undertrial
- BJP MLC Lad meets Jarange with appeal to drop hunger strike from May 30
- CBI arrests Pune headmistress in NEET-UG 2026 paper leak case, questions third Latur doctor
- Maha govt suspends former Beed collector Pathak after arrest in land compensation scam
- Student enrollment drops at over 100 affiliated colleges of Bamu
- Diesel shortage hits parts of state, long queues at pumps in Sambhajinagar
- Act as a unit rather than forming own groups: Samant to party functionaries
Featured In City
- Ikigai in Bengaluru
- Bihar man arrested for casteist slurs, death threats on social media against minister Jitan Ram Manjhi
- ‘Lights off, doors locked’: Twisha Sharma family lawyer claims Samarth Singh 'hid' inside courtroom before arrest
- Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Kolkata among India’s most expensive cities for fuel after price hike; check list
- Rs 64 crore Keni bridge in Bihar shows exposed iron rods, damaged pillars; fears of collapse rise
- Scribe bank launches at Jadavpur University to support visually impaired students during exams
- BMC begins soil testing for planned Malabar Hill tank
Photostories
- Motivational quote of the day by Immanuel Kant: “Rules for happiness..."
- How to grow guava plant in a pot in your balcony
- Why your calf muscles cramp suddenly at night, and what your body may be trying to tell you
- From snakes to crabs: Animals that shed their skin and the reason behind it
- Hollywood actors fired from movies and series
- 10-minute exercises you can do without leaving your bedroom
- 5 upscale residential hotspots driving Goa’s luxury real estate boom
- That burning feeling after meals may be more dangerous than you think: Doctor explains why acidity should never feel normal
- 5 cat breeds with strong snake-hunting instincts that can help protect your home and garden
- Cannes 2026 officially belongs to Aishwarya Rai Bachchan after this breathtaking second appearance in blush pink couture
Videos
- Delhi HC Tears Into WFI Over Vinesh Phogat Trial Ban, Calls Selection Policy “Retrograde”
- Congress Targets PM Modi Over Fresh Fuel Price Hike, Says Govt “Fleecing Citizens”
- Congress' Ajay Rai Faces Massive Backlash Over Alleged Remarks Against PM Modi
03:29 India Battles Extreme Heatwave As Record Power Demand Pushes Electricity Grid Under Severe Stress05:54 Marco Rubio Arrives In India Amid High-Stakes Talks On Energy, Trade, Quad Strategy03:03 Department Of Space Clears Major Space Manufacturing Clusters In Gujarat And Tamil Nadu03:08 Centre To Create Strong Anti-Infiltration Security Layer Across Tripura, Assam And Bengal: Amit Shah04:38 SC To Revisit UAPA Bail Standards As Umar Khalid Case Sparks Bigger Constitutional Debate03:19 India Conducts Successful Agni-1 Missile Test; Strategic Forces Command Validates All Parameters
Hot Picks
Top Trends
Up Next
Follow Us On Social Media