This story is from May 01, 2020
HC rejects law student’s allegations against SIT
PRAYAGRAJ: The
Hence, the court directed the trial court below, which is seized of the matter, after taking cognizance on the police report, to pass any order which it may deem fit and proper in accordance with law.
Hearing an application filed by the law student, who has accused former Union minister and BJP leader Swami Chinmayanand of sexual harassment, a division bench comprising Justice Manoj Misra and Justice
In her application moved before this division bench of
She alleged that the SIT was biased, and that Chinmayanand had been offered “special treatment” through the course of investigation, as if he were a “state guest”. The court accepted the SIT’s contention that it could not be labelled as biased, as it had “strongly opposed” Chinmayanand’s bail application, which resulted in a lower court refusing to grant him bail at one stage.
Allahabad high court
on Thursday rejected allegations of bias andharassment
against theSpecial Investigation
Team (SIT) formed by the UP government to probe theSwami Chinmayanand
sexual abuse case. The allegations were raised in a complaint filed in the HC by the Shahjahanpur law student, who has charged Swami Chinmayanand with sexual harassment.Hence, the court directed the trial court below, which is seized of the matter, after taking cognizance on the police report, to pass any order which it may deem fit and proper in accordance with law.
Deepak Verma
observed, “We are satisfied that SIT has duly investigated all aspects and after thorough investigation has submitted police report. Hence no further action is required.”In her application moved before this division bench of
Allahabad HC
, which is monitoring the trial on SC’s directive, the law student had demanded setting up of a fresh investigation team, and sought action against the officials of the existing SIT for allegedly harassing and assaulting her family members.She alleged that the SIT was biased, and that Chinmayanand had been offered “special treatment” through the course of investigation, as if he were a “state guest”. The court accepted the SIT’s contention that it could not be labelled as biased, as it had “strongly opposed” Chinmayanand’s bail application, which resulted in a lower court refusing to grant him bail at one stage.
Popular from City
- Classroom ‘wedding’ with student puts West Bengal college professor in a spot
- Congress’s Sitapur MP held for rape on pretext of marriage
- Mumbai to Goa in just 6 hours; highway to be completed by June 2025
- Fugitive banker behind Rs 77 crore fraud returns to India, held at Ahmedabad airport after 20 years
- FD fraud: Equitas Bank lodges FIR against ex-branch manager
end of article
Trending Stories
- Economic Survey 2025 Live Updates: PM Modi to address media ahead of Budget session; all eyes on FM Nirmala Sitharaman's Union Budget 2025 speech
- Swara Bhaskar's X account permanently suspended over Republic Day post
- “He came over too much”: Damon Wayans Jr. jokes $3B rich Michael Jordan used to raid his house for snacks
- Govt hikes retirement age of regular faculty in T varsities to 65
- Alex Bregman faces a choice between the Houston Astros’ $156 million and a similar offer from a new team
- Classroom ‘wedding’ with student puts West Bengal college professor in a spot
- Kamala Harris spotted dining with Hollywood friends before Doug Emhoff's new job
Visual Stories
- 10 most beautiful sea animals
- 10 simple and practical ways to achieve internal happiness
- 10 ways to add fiber-rich cabbage in daily diet
- 10 South Indian dishes that are easy to make for breakfast
- From Lion to Butterfly: 10 animals and what do they symbolise
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment