Continue on TOI App
Open App
OPEN APP

Divorced Muslim woman entitled to maintenance for life if not remarried, says Allahabad HC

In its judgment dated December 20, the HC also directed that for ... Read More
PRAYAGRAJ: The Allahabad high court has held that a divorced Muslim woman is entitled to get maintenance from her former husband for the whole life unless she gets married for a second time.

Tired of too many ads?go ad free now
Allowing an appeal filed by one Zahid Khatoon, a division bench comprising Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani and Justice Mohammad Azhar Husain Idrisi set aside the judgment passed by principal judge, family court, Ghazipur, dated September 15, 2022 whereby he had directed that the appellant (Zahid) is entitled for maintenance only for the period of 'iddat' i.e. three months and 13 days from the date of divorce.

While setting aside the judgment of court below, the high court observed, “From the facts and legal position, we have no hesitation to hold that the principal judge, family court, Ghazipur has committed a manifest error of law to hold that the appellant is entitled for maintenance only for the period of iddat. The court below has misread and misunderstood the judgment of supreme court in the case of Danial Latifi and another Vs Union of India (2001), which provides that a Muslim husband is liable to make reasonable and fair provision for the future of the divorced wife, which obviously includes her maintenance as well. Such a reasonable and fair provision (maintenance), which extends beyond the iddat period must be made by the husband within the iddat period.”

Giving this judgment, the high court remitted the matter back to the competent court i.e. concerned magistrate of Ghazipur to decide the case for determining the amount of maintenance and return of properties to the appellant by the husband in accordance with law, positively within three months without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

In its judgment dated December 20, the HC also directed that for a period of three months or till the aforesaid case is decided, whichever is earlier, the respondent husband should pay to the appellant herein a sum of Rs 5000/ per month before the 10th day of each month towards interim maintenance.

The appellant – Zahida Khatoon was married to the respondent – Narul Haque on May 21, 1989 as per Muslim rites and ritual. Though at the time of marriage, the husband was not employed but later he joined the service of the postal department as postal assistant. He gave divorce to the appellant on June 28, 2000 and thereafter he married another Muslim woman in 2002.
Tired of too many ads?go ad free now

However, he neither paid Mehr nor any maintenance amount, nor returned the articles belonging to the applicant/appellant, therefore, the applicant/appellant filed a case for maintenance and others on September 10, 2002 under 3 of the muslim women (protection of rights on divorce) Act 1986 before the concerned court at district court at Ghazipur.

A Mehr is the obligation, in the form of money or possessions paid by the groom, to the bride at the time of Muslim marriage.
Top Comment
p
pbuh
740 days ago
UNWARRANTED UNSOLICITED UNDIGNIFIED UNWELCOME BAD INTENTIONED INTERFERENCE BY JUDICIARY. Do these parasite blood suckers who are extremely corrupt , assume that their 350cc brain is wiser than the WISDOM that codified Holy Quaran? Holy Quaran clearly laid out that a man must pay MOHR to a woman when he marries her. This money belongs to the lady only. Not her husband, children or even her parents have a claim on that. In the event of getting a triple Talaq or her husband dies, she has to observe IDDAT period of 4 months and 10 days to ensure that she is not pregnant. If she is not pregnant, she has right to remarry on the very next day. If she is pregnant , then her parents or in-laws must provide for the lady until she delivers the baby suckles a minimum 2 years . If her parents or inlaws or a would be husband accepts to take care of the child, then, she can remarry. VERY VERY CLEAR. No individual 350 cc brain in authority can interfere with this. NO MATTER another QUARANIC INJUNCTION is totally ignored. That wealth under the surface belongs to ulema = Body of faithful and the King of Saudi has a QUARN imposed duty to equitably and fairly distribute that wealth among ulema. In this case the muslim leaders’ (such as ASSaDUDEinOWAISI . SHaiks, KHANs and so on) impotence is to blame in not demanding our share of wealth. Further , first tenet if islam is that there is no God but one God. Another TENET is that King of Saudi alone is leader of BODY of faithful. That means secularism and democracy are opposed to islam. So leaders in secular democracies can’t even open their mouth else they get labelled as NAQLI CONVERTS not belonging to ulema and lose their right even to create strife in Indiia
Continue Reading
Follow Us On Social Media
end of article
More Trending Stories
Visual Stories
More Visual Stories
Expand
UP NEXT
Do Not Sell Or Share My Personal Information