This story is from June 16, 2018
Vanzara seeks parity with senior for discharge
AHMEDABAD: Retired DIG and an accused in the 2004
Pandey was discharged in this case in February, for want of evidence against him as well as for lack of government sanction from the government to criminally prosecute him in the case, in which four persons — Ishrat, Javed Shaikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjad Ali Rana and Jishan Zohar — were killed in an encounter with city police on June 15, 2004. Seven cops were charged by the CBI for murder, criminal conspiracy, kidnapping and illegal detention in this case.
Vanzara’s advocate V D Gajjar submitted before special CBI judge K J Pandya that the Intelligence Bureau’s inputs were received by the then police commissioner K R Kaushik. The information and instructions were passed on to then joint police commissioner Pandey. He was the third officer in the chain of command and was following orders and accordingly instructed his subordinates do nakabandi in the city. He acted as part of his official duty.
The lawyer also submitted that while Ishrat and her companions were armed with AK-56 rifles and opened fire, the cops had little option but to resort to counter firing. He claimed Pillai was accused of counterfeiting currency and used to hold two passports. Ishrat was in knowledge of this.
The court has posted further proceeding on June 30, when it is likely to decide on the discharge of another accused, N K Amin, in this case.
Ishrat Jahan case
, D GVanzara
on Friday sought benefit of parity with his senior P P Pandey in seeking a discharge from the case.Pandey was discharged in this case in February, for want of evidence against him as well as for lack of government sanction from the government to criminally prosecute him in the case, in which four persons — Ishrat, Javed Shaikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjad Ali Rana and Jishan Zohar — were killed in an encounter with city police on June 15, 2004. Seven cops were charged by the CBI for murder, criminal conspiracy, kidnapping and illegal detention in this case.
The lawyer also submitted that while Ishrat and her companions were armed with AK-56 rifles and opened fire, the cops had little option but to resort to counter firing. He claimed Pillai was accused of counterfeiting currency and used to hold two passports. Ishrat was in knowledge of this.
The court has posted further proceeding on June 30, when it is likely to decide on the discharge of another accused, N K Amin, in this case.
Popular from City
- Delhi air pollution: City chokes as AQI level reaches 'severe' category
- Haryana rolls out new retirement housing policy for senior citizens
- Al-Qaeda search takes NIA team to Beniapukur
- Chennai doctor stabbed by disgruntled patient's son at hospital
- Dehradun bizman flagged highspeed MUV before fatal crash that killed 6
end of article
Trending Stories
- CSBC Bihar Police Constable Result 2024 Out: Direct Link to Check Here
- Delhi air pollution: City chokes as AQI level reaches 'severe' category
- 'Couldn't have asked for better company': Zomato CEO's heartfelt message as rival Swiggy makes market debut
- Sunita Williams’ Starliner delays impacted hospitalised NASA astronauts' return, now they reveal post-splashdown symptoms
- 'Deleting a lot of people...': Bride shares pain after 'empty' wedding reception video goes viral
- 'No request' from BCCI but Australian media report claims India wanted...
- NASA alert! 'God of Chaos' asteroid approaching Earth on November 13 sparks worldwide concern
Visual Stories
- 7 tips to discipline a child without scolding or hitting
- 9 low-maintenance creepers that will add charm to your balcony
- How to make South Indian-style Mushroom Ghee Roast
- 10 unique varieties of Gulab Jamun that are must-try
- 10 animals found only in Africa
TOP TRENDS
UP NEXT
Start a Conversation
Post comment