'Would be disaster if ... ': Donald Trump doubles down on tariffs after US court calls them illegal; what next?
US President Donald Trump on Friday said that he would "fight back" after a US federal court in a significant ruling found his global tariffs "illegal."
The US court of appeals for the federal circuit in Washington ruled that many of Trump's tariffs were illegal; however, it allowed them to remain in place for now, giving the US president time to take the matter to the Supreme Court.
A furious Trump termed the court ruling "incorrect," saying that "ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT!"
Also Read: US court declares most tariffs illegal; Trump says 'total disaster for country'
"Today, a Highly Partisan Appeals Court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
Blown by the decision, Trump flagged that if tariffs ever went away, it would be a "total disaster" for US, adding that the country "will no longer tolerate enormous Trade Deficits and unfair Tariffs and Non-Tariff Trade Barriers imposed by other Countries, friend or foe."
"The USA will no longer tolerate enormous Trade Deficits and unfair Tariffs and Non-Tariff Trade Barriers imposed by other Countries, friend or foe, that undermine our Manufacturers, Farmers, and everyone else," he added.
"If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America," Trump wrote further.
The US president underlined that the tariffs imposed by him on several countries, which resulted in a trade war, are "best tool" for US workers and "support Companies that produce great MADE IN AMERICA products."
ALSO READ: Former US NSA Jake Sullivan says Trump’s ‘massive trade offensive’ is pushing India toward China
Trump said that for many years tariffs were used against US but now he will approach Supreme Court to make America "Rich, Strong, and Powerful Again."
The 7-4 ruling by the US court observed: "The statute bestows significant authority on the President to undertake a number of actions in response to a declared national emergency, but none of these actions explicitly include the power to impose tariffs, duties, or the like, or the power to tax," as quoted by Reuters.
The decision also noted that the US president had exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
Federal court's ruling has thrown a roadblock to Trump's path after he audaciously claimed unlimited power to bypass Congress and imposed tariffs on several countries, friends and foes.
The decision was centred on tariffs Trump imposed on almost every country on earth on April 2, calling it 'Liberation Day,' as well as levies on China, Mexico, and Canada.
The court stated that he overstepped when he declared national emergencies to justify imposing tariffs on several countries.
If tariffs are struck down, the US administration argued that it will have to refund some of the import taxes that were collected. It will be a major financial blow for US treasury. According to news report from AP, by July the revenue from tariffs totalled to $159 billion, more than expected. The justice department earlier had said that revoking the tariffs could mean "financial ruin" for America.
"While existing trade deals may not automatically unravel, the administration could lose a pillar of its negotiating strategy, which may embolden foreign governments to resist future demands, delay implementation of prior commitments, or even seek to renegotiate terms," Ashley Akers, a former justice department trial lawyer, said before the appeals court decision, as quoted by AP.
Meanwhile, Trump declared on his social media platform that he will take the fight to the Supreme Court. "If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America," he wrote.
While the president still has other legal tools to levy import taxes, they are far more limited. The Trade Act of 1974, for example, allows tariffs of only up to 15% and for a maximum of 150 days against countries with which the U.S. runs large trade deficits.
Another option is Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 — the basis for past tariffs on steel, aluminum and autos. But that route requires a formal Commerce Department investigation and cannot be triggered at the president’s discretion.
A furious Trump termed the court ruling "incorrect," saying that "ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT!"
Also Read: US court declares most tariffs illegal; Trump says 'total disaster for country'
"Today, a Highly Partisan Appeals Court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
'Total disaster for US'
Blown by the decision, Trump flagged that if tariffs ever went away, it would be a "total disaster" for US, adding that the country "will no longer tolerate enormous Trade Deficits and unfair Tariffs and Non-Tariff Trade Barriers imposed by other Countries, friend or foe."
"If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America," Trump wrote further.
The US president underlined that the tariffs imposed by him on several countries, which resulted in a trade war, are "best tool" for US workers and "support Companies that produce great MADE IN AMERICA products."
ALSO READ: Former US NSA Jake Sullivan says Trump’s ‘massive trade offensive’ is pushing India toward China
Trump said that for many years tariffs were used against US but now he will approach Supreme Court to make America "Rich, Strong, and Powerful Again."
Trump went too far
The 7-4 ruling by the US court observed: "The statute bestows significant authority on the President to undertake a number of actions in response to a declared national emergency, but none of these actions explicitly include the power to impose tariffs, duties, or the like, or the power to tax," as quoted by Reuters.
The decision also noted that the US president had exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
Federal court's ruling has thrown a roadblock to Trump's path after he audaciously claimed unlimited power to bypass Congress and imposed tariffs on several countries, friends and foes.
The decision was centred on tariffs Trump imposed on almost every country on earth on April 2, calling it 'Liberation Day,' as well as levies on China, Mexico, and Canada.
The court stated that he overstepped when he declared national emergencies to justify imposing tariffs on several countries.
What next?
If tariffs are struck down, the US administration argued that it will have to refund some of the import taxes that were collected. It will be a major financial blow for US treasury. According to news report from AP, by July the revenue from tariffs totalled to $159 billion, more than expected. The justice department earlier had said that revoking the tariffs could mean "financial ruin" for America.
"While existing trade deals may not automatically unravel, the administration could lose a pillar of its negotiating strategy, which may embolden foreign governments to resist future demands, delay implementation of prior commitments, or even seek to renegotiate terms," Ashley Akers, a former justice department trial lawyer, said before the appeals court decision, as quoted by AP.
Meanwhile, Trump declared on his social media platform that he will take the fight to the Supreme Court. "If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America," he wrote.
While the president still has other legal tools to levy import taxes, they are far more limited. The Trade Act of 1974, for example, allows tariffs of only up to 15% and for a maximum of 150 days against countries with which the U.S. runs large trade deficits.
Another option is Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 — the basis for past tariffs on steel, aluminum and autos. But that route requires a formal Commerce Department investigation and cannot be triggered at the president’s discretion.
Popular from Business
- GDP growth at 7.8%: What Trump doesn’t get about India’s 'dead' economy
- 'No major downside': CEA V Anantha Nageswaran asserts US tariffs' impact to be short-lived; pegs India’s FY26 GDP growth at 6.3-6.8%
- Amidst Trump’s tariffs, India buys more US oil - competitive prices at play; trade deficit to narrow
- India’s GDP grows at robust 7.8% in Q1 FY26; 5-quarter high number beats estimates by wide margin - key highlights
- ‘India’s rise unstoppable’: Mukesh Ambani for India-first development model at RIL AGM; here’s what he said
end of article
Trending Stories
- Scientists tagged a whale with a camera; the footage left them speechless
- When Larry Ellison said: Bill Gates forgive me, there are a lot of people in the world smarter than you; but …
- Baba Vanga predictions that came true in 2025: Complete list of prophecies from earthquake to global economic instability
- Former tennis star Anna Kournikova pregnant at 44 expecting fourth child with Enrique Iglesias after health scare
- Elon Musk's lawyers to US judge: Reject OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's request to show chats between Musk and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg
- H-1B visa bias? Assistant attorney general Dhillon probing cases; 'list continues to grow'
- “He kept hitting”: Wayne Gretzky admits his last NHL game was “awful” as his dad kept pushing him to play one more year
Featured in Business
- Zydus Wellness acquires UK-based Comfort Click for GBP 239 mn; enters VMS market; strengthens global push
- Canada GDP contracts 1.6% in Q2, US tariffs weigh on exports, first decline in seven quarters
- Critical minerals pact: India, Japan ink cooperation deal; pact to diversify critical supply chains
- Gunny bag charges: Centre hikes usage rate by 40% to Rs 10.22 per bag; to aid procurement
- US stocks today: Wall Street slips from record highs as inflation steadies; traders eye September Fed rate cut
- 'No major downside': CEA V Anantha Nageswaran asserts US tariffs' impact to be short-lived; pegs India’s FY26 GDP at 6.3-6.8%
Visual Stories
- Aishwarya Lekshmi's jaw-dropping pics
- Munmun Dutta’s gorgeous ethnic looks for Ganpati
- In pics: Stunning looks of Divya Pillai
- In pics: Adorable looks of Nazriya Nazim
- Vishal and Sai Dhanshika's love journey: From friendship to engagement
- Heritage, origin and timeless charm: A look at Indian earrings through the ages
- 'Lokah' actress Kalyani Priyadarshan's dazzling snaps
- 10 Indian baby names inspired by mountains and peaks
- 8 powerful reads for success-driven mindset
- 7 Extraordinary creatures that have blue blood -a hidden wonder of animal kingdom
Photostories
- 5 traditional footwear picks that will let your Anarkali do the talking
- Praising a child: 5 important things to know before giving that pat on the back
- Bollywood films that echo the lives of political leaders
- America’s 7 most overcrowded attractions; where crowds are always guaranteed!
- The Great Indian Kapil Show 3 From Vijay Shekhar Sharma's love for paanipuri to Aman Gupta on staying grounded; unseen moments
- Voter Adhikar Yatra: Rahul Gandhi's rally enters final phase in Bihar – in photos
- Fatty liver disease: Alcohol vs non-alcoholic fatty liver; What’s more dangerous?
- From his relationship details to talking about sleep apnea; Bigg Boss 19 contestant Amaal Mallik’s major revelations
- 5 Birds with the Most Beautiful Wings in the World
- Parineeti Chopra to Patralekhaa: Celebrities who are pregnant
Top Trends
Up Next
Start a Conversation
Post comment